Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نسخ الاسئلة الوزارية مع الاجوبة النموذجية

Channel

نسخ الاسئلة الوزارية مع الاجوبة النموذجية

@IraqEduExams

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76,516subscribers

-6,936 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002591126656
TypeChannel
Username@IraqEduExams
Description• قناة مختصة بنشر نسخ الاسئلة الوزارية مع الاجوبة النموذجية الصادرة من مركز فحص الكونترول 📝 • موقع المساعد التعليمي iraqedu.net
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/IraqEduExams

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

41,300 average views per post against 76,516 subscribers — an engagement rate of 54.0%. Across the 2,103 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,631–99,876 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.57% and 10.9%, with a median of 4.99%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (22 August 2026 21 September 2026)
Posts measured14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled578,860
Mature posts only67.0% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers76,516 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb31623:ara · 2,103 channels · p10 0.406% · p25 1.57% · p50 4.99% · p75 10.9% · p90 20.2%
Position in cohort99.477th percentile · 10.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.081% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 21 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

76,51683,45279,9847 August 2026 — 83,452 subscribers7 August 2026 — 83,452 subscribers8 August 2026 — 83,397 subscribers9 August 2026 — 83,306 subscribers10 August 2026 — 83,215 subscribers11 August 2026 — 83,122 subscribers12 August 2026 — 83,028 subscribers13 August 2026 — 82,960 subscribers14 August 2026 — 82,766 subscribers16 August 2026 — 82,682 subscribers17 August 2026 — 82,605 subscribers18 August 2026 — 82,551 subscribers19 August 2026 — 82,480 subscribers20 August 2026 — 82,363 subscribers21 August 2026 — 82,267 subscribers23 August 2026 — 82,177 subscribers25 August 2026 — 82,011 subscribers26 August 2026 — 81,704 subscribers26 August 2026 — 81,662 subscribers27 August 2026 — 81,621 subscribers28 August 2026 — 81,564 subscribers29 August 2026 — 81,474 subscribers30 August 2026 — 81,293 subscribers31 August 2026 — 81,098 subscribers1 September 2026 — 80,904 subscribers3 September 2026 — 80,660 subscribers4 September 2026 — 80,474 subscribers7 September 2026 — 80,101 subscribers10 September 2026 — 79,035 subscribers12 September 2026 — 77,299 subscribers14 September 2026 — 76,937 subscribers15 September 2026 — 76,811 subscribers17 September 2026 — 76,516 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -6,936. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,476–84,492 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:4076,516-295
15 Sept 2026, 18:2176,811-126
14 Sept 2026, 04:1676,937-362
12 Sept 2026, 09:3977,299-1,736
10 Sept 2026, 09:0179,035-1,066
7 Sept 2026, 01:5880,101-373
4 Sept 2026, 12:1880,474-186
3 Sept 2026, 01:4880,660-244
1 Sept 2026, 22:0480,904-194
31 Aug 2026, 21:2881,098-195
30 Aug 2026, 21:4581,293-181
29 Aug 2026, 20:2581,474-90
28 Aug 2026, 18:1781,564-57
27 Aug 2026, 20:5481,621-41
26 Aug 2026, 22:2481,662-42
26 Aug 2026, 01:5381,704-307
25 Aug 2026, 00:2582,011-166
23 Aug 2026, 13:1282,177-90
21 Aug 2026, 21:2782,267-96
20 Aug 2026, 19:0282,363first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.0%
avg views ÷ 76,516 subscribers
Avg views / post
41,300
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.058%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held36 (19 June 202620 September 2026)
Views total578,860
Reactions total335
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Sept 2026, 12:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
177
Links
1,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,011 reactions across 36 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,89594.2%
👍1165.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,011 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC≈6,230 views18 reactionsread 21 September 2026

السلام عليكم الي عنده الأجوبة النموذجية للدور الثاني 2026 (لغير الفيزياء و الكيمياء و الاحياء) يرسلها على حساب التواصل @IraqEduSupport

18

18 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈7,360 views19 reactionsread 19 September 2026

السلام عليكم الي عنده الأجوبة النموذجية للدور الثاني 2026 (لغير الفيزياء و الكيمياء و الاحياء) يرسلها على حساب التواصل @IraqEduSupport

19

18 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC≈76,400 views19 reactionsread 21 September 2026
File

#حصريا الأجوبة النموذجية مركزة الفحص وزارة التربية ♥️ لأسئلة الاحياء الدور الثاني السادس العلمي 2026 📝 شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍 الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ 👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت 🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل

19

14 Sept 2026, 05:38 UTC≈9,440 views25 reactionsread 17 September 2026

السلام عليكم الي عنده الأجوبة النموذجية للدور الثاني 2026 (لغير الفيزياء و الكيمياء) يرسلها على حساب التواصل @IraqEduSupport

25

14 Sept 2026, 05:30 UTC≈194,000 views32 reactionsread 21 September 2026
File

#حصريا الأجوبة النموذجية مركزة الفحص وزارة التربية ♥️ لأسئلة الكيمياء الدور الثاني السادس العلمي 2026 📝 شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍 الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ 👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت 🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل

32

13 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC≈177,000 views34 reactionsread 21 September 2026
File

#حصريا الأجوبة النموذجية مركزة الفحص وزارة التربية ♥️ لأسئلة الفيزياء الدور الثاني السادس العلمي 2026 📝 شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍 الرابط: t.me/SadsHelp ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ 👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت 🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل

31👍3

13 Sept 2026, 11:26 UTC≈4,040 views22 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @SadsHelpPhoto

#رسمياً | امتحان الفيزياء للصف السادس العلمي – الدور الثاني 2026 يُمنح الطالب 8 درجات من أصل 10 في السؤال السادس الفرع (A)، إذا أجاب عن الرسم أو الشرح. يعني الطالب اللي راسم فقط ينطوه 8 درجات واللي كاتب الشرح فقط هم ينطوه 8 درجات أمّا اللي راسم وكاتب الشرح، ينطوه 10 درجات كاملة شبكة المساعد التعليمية 👍 الرابط 🔗: t.me/SadsHelp ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ 👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 البوت 🏛 المكتبة🖤👥 الكروب🖤📧 التواصل

20👍2

10 Sept 2026, 18:30 UTC≈10,700 views31 reactionsread 13 September 2026

السلام عليكم الي عنده الاجوبة النموذجية للدور الثاني 2026 يرسلها على حساب التواصل @IraqEduSupport

31

9 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈5,880 views24 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

#نسخ_الوزاريات 💡 نسخ الأسئلة الوزارية مع الأجوبة النموذجية 📚 وزارة التربية العراقية مركز الفحص الكونترول ♥️ المادة: الفيزياء 💡 الصف: السادس العلمي ℹ️ ⬅️ جميع النسخ الوزارية للأعوام : ➖عام 2013 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2014 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2015 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2016 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2017 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2018 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2019 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2020 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2021 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2022 : اضغط هنا ➖عام 2023 : اضغط هنا ➖ع

24

8 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC≈4,810 views11 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @iraqeduportalVideo

تدرس على اليوتيوب وتتفاجأ بالامتحان؟ المحاضرة تفهمك.. بس الاختبار هو الي يثبت معلومتك! اختبر مستواك واكتشف أخطاءك أول بأول ويا بوابة المساعد ...🔮 بوابة المساعد | AL MOSAED PORTAL https://t.me/iraqeduportal 💜

11

4 Sept 2026, 16:17 UTC≈16,400 views24 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @IraqEduLibraryFile

ملزمة المساعد في الاحياء 🧬 للصف الثالث المتوسط 2025-2026 مميزات الملزمة: ℹ️ 1⃣: تحتوي على الأسئلة الوزارية من 2016 ولغاية 2026 ولجميع الأدوار. 2⃣: مدعّمة بحلول الأجوبة النموذجية و الكتاب المنهجي. 3⃣: مقسمة حسب فصول ومواضيع الكتاب المنهجي. ✍️: اعداد | شبكة المساعد التعليمية ✅ 🔗 رابط نسخ الاحياء مع الأجوبة النموذجية (2011-2026) : ( اضغط هنا ) شبكة المساعد التعليمية 💻 ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ 👉 القناة🖤🌎 الموقع🖤 🤖 الب

23👍1

2 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC≈17,200 views17 reactionsread 9 September 2026

اصدقائنا شاركوا بالاستمارة واكتبوا كل شي محتارين بيه عن الجامعات، الأقسام، التخصصات ومستقبلكم الجامعي وإحنا راح نبني الخطوات الجاية على احتياجاتكم 💙 https://forms.gle/3fUCp5oWLoYedmY38

16👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @IraqEduExams. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نسخ الاسئلة الوزارية مع الاجوبة النموذجية” (@IraqEduExams), 76,516 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IraqEduExams.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.