The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
π The Islanders Challenge πΈ
@Islanders_Challenge
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
40subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001325747352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Islanders_Challenge |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Islanders_Challenge |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 40 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 41 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 41 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 19 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2022 to 2 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Elon Musk RT @Tesla: In Dog Mode, air conditioning will stay on while the car is locked, keeping your pets safe & comfortable "The dog mode in my Tesla is such a life saver for road trips π https://t.co/ST3ibkHbzY" - γ’ tweet
π1
Elon Musk A+ for cinematography https://t.co/anGjQKbq5W tweet
π1
vitalik.eth YYYY-MM-DD is the only correct date format. * It's an ISO standard: https://t.co/n3wKGrNuMH * It's unambiguous (is 03/05/22 March 5 or May 3? No such problem here!) * General-purpose sorting sorts dates correctly * East Asian countries like Japan π―π΅π―π΅π―π΅ use it ("2022εΉ΄5ζ3ζ₯") "https://t.co/7IXv98wxPR" - Terrible Maps tweet
π1
vitalik.eth RT @balajis: Good review, go read. May write more, but my quick response (and I think Vitalik would agree) is that the network state concept is flexible enough to accommodate these proposed edits. It's very much a toolbox rather than a manifesto. "What do I think about network states? This one somehow ended up VERY long, but.... oh well, enjoy! https://t.co/2V3cCuW1T7" - vitalik.eth tweet
π1
Elon Musk https://t.co/eZMSX2x82e tweet
π1
vitalik.eth What do I think about network states? This one somehow ended up VERY long, but.... oh well, enjoy! https://t.co/2V3cCuW1T7 tweet
π1
Elon Musk Starship launch site tonight https://t.co/Len70RGCNf tweet
π1
Elon Musk Excited about @NASAWebb potential! tweet
π1
Elon Musk Oh the irony lol tweet
π1
vitalik.eth It's amazing how some PoW proponents just keep repeating the unmitigated bare-faced lie that PoS includes voting on protocol parameters (it doesn't, just like PoW doesn't) and this so often just goes unchallenged. Nodes reject invalid blocks, in PoS and in PoW. It's not hard. "Dear Proof of Stakers, The fact that you can vote on something to change its properties is proof that it's a security. Love, Biβ¦
π1
Elon Musk The dark truth about Audible https://t.co/ppOs7vNSrA tweet
π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Islanders_Challenge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Islanders_Challenge named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 β 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ The Islanders Challenge πΈβ (@Islanders_Challenge), 40 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Islanders_Challenge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.