В последний путь🥹
🫡3
Signed IvanLeps

Channel
@Ivanlepsik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002634788156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ivanlepsik |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ivanlepsik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 70 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 69 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 69 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 25.8% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 16.1% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 12.9% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В последний путь🥹
🫡3
Signed IvanLeps
Доска почёта
👻4
Signed IvanLeps
Вчера такой мощный шторм был
⚡5
Signed IvanLeps
Posted without readable text
Пока что я увидел не мало интересных теорий. Но я думаю что можно дать вам подсказку и сказать что вы двигайтесь не в том направлении, думайте шире, думайте масштабнее. Присматривайтесь к последним лорным видео, так же ко многим кадрам в трейлере (даже те что появляются на долю секунды). Подумайте про названия, скрины, и некоторые Эдиты которые перекидывали в Каналы, внимательно на Рендор тоже смотрите.
❤1
Signed IvanLeps
🤩Розыгрыш подписки PRIME! Объявляем розыгрыш, победитель которого получит подписку PRIME на целый год! Суть проста: вам нужно написать свою теорию о предстоящем ивенте в комментариях под этим постом. Теория должна быть обоснованной и аргументированной. Чтобы подготовить самую сильную версию, советуем изучить: • наше лорное вики; • посты в нашем телеграм-канале; • видео на нашем YouTube-канале; • трейлер ивента.…
Ну да, это я делал
Signed IvanLeps
🤩Трейлер ивента «Эхо Разлома» Надеемся, вас не сильно огорчил наш прогревающий ивент. Дабы немного порадовать вас, мы готовы показать вам трейлер нашего полноценно ивента «Эхо Разлома», который вы увидите уже совсем скоро! 🤩Однако некоторые сцены и скины в трейлере были изменены, чтобы не спойлерить вам весь ивент и сохранить интригу до самого его начала. 🤩Также, чтобы вы могли освежить в памяти наш лор, мы подго…
Signed IvanLeps
day 1
Signed IvanLeps
Video, posted without a caption
💩1
Signed IvanLeps
Нашей команде удалось перехватить старый сигнал с шаттла, по моим расчетам он был отправлен примерно 5 месяцев назад, отправлено где-то 28.08.2025, скорее всего затерялся в ***** … Думаю что командованию не стоит пока что об этом знать. А то еще сделают из этого скандал, хотя запись меня продолжает настораживать… -Неизвестный сотрудник ОКО
Signed IvanLeps
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed IvanLeps
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Ivanlepsik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сарай ИванЛепса💀” (@Ivanlepsik), 70 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ivanlepsik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.