Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПЕРЕХОДИМ в Новый канал - @JohnCenterStudio

Channel

ПЕРЕХОДИМ в Новый канал - @JohnCenterStudio

@JCenterSCourse

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,820subscribers

-130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001431188292
TypeChannel
Username@JCenterSCourse
DescriptionРКН: 5180194615 НОВЫЙ КАНАЛ - @JohnCenterStudio << << << НОВЫЙ КАНАЛ - @JohnCenterStudio << << << НОВЫЙ КАНАЛ - @JohnCenterStudio << << << НОВЫЙ КАНАЛ - @JohnCenterStudio << << << НОВЫЙ КАНАЛ - @JohnCenterStudio << << << НОВЫЙ КАНАЛ - @JohnCenterStudio <
Created11 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JCenterSCourse

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

12,82012,95012,8856 August 2026 — 12,950 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,950 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,944 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,940 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,936 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,929 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,927 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,922 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,919 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,917 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,899 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,898 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,893 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,889 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,880 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,868 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,862 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,841 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,828 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,824 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,823 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,820 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net -130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,801–12,970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 09:2712,820-3
27 Aug 2026, 11:0412,823-1
26 Aug 2026, 10:5612,824-4
25 Aug 2026, 11:1512,828-13
24 Aug 2026, 12:3912,841-21
22 Aug 2026, 16:5912,862-6
21 Aug 2026, 09:0612,868-12
20 Aug 2026, 10:5212,880-9
19 Aug 2026, 11:2912,889-4
18 Aug 2026, 14:5612,893-5
17 Aug 2026, 16:1512,898-1
16 Aug 2026, 07:4712,899-18
14 Aug 2026, 16:2312,917-2
13 Aug 2026, 07:4512,919-3
12 Aug 2026, 11:0512,922-5
11 Aug 2026, 07:4612,927-2
10 Aug 2026, 11:0312,929-7
9 Aug 2026, 12:3812,936-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:3712,940-4
7 Aug 2026, 13:0712,944first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.31%
avg views ÷ 12,820 subscribers
Avg views / post
424
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.789%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held52 (13 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total16,542
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,980
Videos
1,140
Links
2,970

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26m 01s
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 23 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3837.6%
👍2423.8%
2322.8%
❤‍🔥32.97%
🤝32.97%
👎21.98%
😁21.98%
😎21.98%
😭21.98%
💩10.99%
😢10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC236 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @dimurgisPhoto

Это я щас над новым большим видосом работаю прямо из кладовки

Signed Джон Три дэшник

27 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC299 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @JohnCenterStudioVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Джон Три дэшник

27 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC282 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @JohnCenterStudioVideo

Полицейские погони в GTA 6

😁2

Signed Джон Три дэшник

25 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC375 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

От студента @hollow_in: Продолжаю осваивать ComfyUI в связке с другими нейросетями. В этот раз протестировал Veo Omni. Хотелось проверить, насколько хорошо он вычищает артефакты на видео. На основе 3D-сцены я сгенерировал ролик в LTX 2.3. Прогнал его через Veo Omni - убрал артефакты генерации. Заапскейлил в Topaz с увеличением частоты кадров. Вторая часть ролика сделана в Seedance 2. В After Effects доработал ос

🔥3🤝3👍21

Signed Джон Три дэшник

25 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC347 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @JohnCenterStudioPhoto

Нужно понимать, кто заказывает эти нейро-видео в объемах. Это как с вакансиями: смотря с чем сравниваешь, в целом этот рынок можно сравнивать с рынком вакансий, а можно с рынком компаний. Вакансий, как не было, так и нет. Люди, смотрящие туда, очевидно разочаровываются, этот рынок уже куплен, и одни и те же компании крутятся по кругу много лет. Всего в СНГ 300+ более-менее значимых студий, дальше уже нужно "семиче

👍3

Signed Джон Три дэшник

24 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC329 viewsread 29 August 2026

Как бы вы жоско не обсирали нейронки, не погружаться в них - не значит, что вас это не коснется. Переработали вообще все обучение, а под конец записал для вас - действия дальше. Как упаковать все наше сделанное добро, создадим сайт свой вместе с нужными параметрами и сформируем базу с заказчиками от вашей гео и направления. Этому потоку мы отдали предпочтение в навыки, которые требуются на рынке сейчас, поэтому уч

Signed Джон Три дэшник

24 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC340 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @JohnCenterStudioVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Джон Три дэшник

24 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC360 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @JohnCenterStudioVideo

🦾 Робо-руки Кайфую от подобных конструкций. Особенно, когда видишь закулисье и эмоции разработчиков. Система GEN-1.5 обучается новым задачам за несколько секунд. Достаточно продемонстрировать ей свое действие. Алгоритмы базируются на реальных примерах и симуляциях, поэтому может собирать воедино данные и выполнять новые задачи с генерацией промежуточных действий. В Китае кстати проходят всемирные игры роботов-гум

Signed Джон Три дэшник

23 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC391 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @JohnCenterStudioVoice message

2x

Signed Джон Три дэшник

23 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC450 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @JohnCenterStudio

LiquiGen 1.1.0 🌊 Теперь, триангуляцию сетки можно уменьшать без потери формы. Snap to Colliders плотнее прижимает жидкость к коллайдерам - например, воду к стенкам стакана. А вы юзаете меш или частицы? Улучшили Smooth Mesh: можно сохранять острые гребни волн и брызги, а остальную жидкость делать более гладкой. IlluGen 1.2 🧶 Новый Image to Material вытаскивает из фото albedo, height и roughness, после чего матери

Signed Джон Три дэшник

23 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC481 viewsread 29 August 2026

Ути, бозе, кто сидит такой холосий? Очень большая неопределенность сейчас в голове, да. Понимаю. Хочется, чтобы прям вот всё было понятно, что делать, и просто двигаться в этом направлении. Хочется делать, и в этом был смысл. Шоб передышка хоть какая-то была. Шоб лето мимо не пролетало, сука, оно уже кончается, бляц. Просто сидеть гамать и нихуя не делац. НО... Время пройдет, скоро новый год. Денег опять ниху

Signed Джон Три дэшник

22 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC441 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @JohnCenterStudio

Posted without readable text

Signed Джон Три дэшник

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @JCenterSCourse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTCAnonymous Poll884 voters

Фриланс или офис?

  1. 🏠 Фриланс66%
  2. 🏢 Офис44%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,229,758 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПЕРЕХОДИМ в Новый канал - @JohnCenterStudio” (@JCenterSCourse), 12,820 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JCenterSCourse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.