空了哥哥们

Channel
欧美的朋友圈
@JIANGNINGXUANXUAN888
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
98subscribers
+39 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004454771541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JIANGNINGXUANXUAN888 |
| Created | 2 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JIANGNINGXUANXUAN888 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 98 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 89 | +28 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 61 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 59 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 120.8%
- avg views ÷ 98 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 118
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (2 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 829 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
有位置哥哥们
开课了宝宝们
【妹妹花名】:欧美 @YYLL88899966 【报告署名】:匿 【验证时间】:2026.8.29 【验证地点】:江宁区河定桥附近 【服务类别】:98 【修车水费】:700p 工兵优惠价 【妹妹类型】:嫩妹 【颜值身材】: {年龄}:23左右 {颜值}:和照片8成像 {皮肤}:肤色偏白 {罩杯}:C {身高}:163 {体重}:110左右 {赘肉}: 小腹和大腿有赘肉 {颜值综合打分}:7.9 {身材综合打分}:7.6 【服务质量】: {服务内容}:和课表一致 {服务水平}:中上 {服务态度}:还行 {服务综合打分}:7 【纹身疤痕】: 无纹身和明显疤痕 【是否吸烟】:科室无烟味 【课室卫生】:室内简陋,空调不足 【周边环境】:公寓停车方便,课室直达 【综合打分】:7.8 【综合评述】: {优势}:大胸大屁股 {不足}:科室在公寓 【过程概述】: 科室很好找是公寓,室内比较简陋空调冷气不足,妹子颜值和照片基本一致,照片…
【妹妹花名】:欧美 @YYLL88899966 【报告署名】:匿名 【验证时间】:日期8.30 【验证地点】:江宁区 【服务类别】:98(大项) 【修车水费】:400p(工兵-300) 【妹妹类型】:少妇 【颜值身材】: {年龄}:25左右 {颜值}:颜值8分 {皮肤}:偏黄皮肤 {罩杯}:B {身高}:160 {体重}:110左右 {赘肉}:一点赘肉不太影响 {颜值综合打分}:8分 {身材综合打分}:8分 【服务质量】:8分 {服务内容}:口做舔胸舌吻 {服务水平}:人照七成 {服务态度}:中上 {服务综合打分}:8分 【纹身疤痕】:暂无纹身 【是否吸烟】:暂未发现 【课室卫生】:无一次性床单 【周边环境】:河定桥地铁站附近 【综合打分】:8分 【综合评述】:8分 {优势}:口活舒服 {不足}: 【过程概述】:本来相约晚上的,后来档期满了,约了第二天中午。中午到了后,公寓无门禁,遥控上楼后,见到小姐姐穿了黑色蕾丝睡衣…
【妹妹花名】:欧美 @YYLL88899966 【报告署名】:匿名 【验证时间】:日期8.29 【验证地点】:江宁区河定桥附近 【服务类别】:98(大项) 【修车水费】:700p(工兵-300) 【妹妹类型】:bbw 【颜值身材】: {年龄}:24左右 {颜值}:颜值8分 {皮肤}:黄皮偏白 {罩杯}:C {身高}:163左右 {体重}:110左右 {赘肉}:稍微有点 {颜值综合打分}:7.5分 {身材综合打分}:7.5分 【服务质量】: {服务内容}:三件套+舌吻 {服务水平}:人照七成 {服务态度}:良好 {服务综合打分}:7.5分 【纹身疤痕】:无 【是否吸烟】:未知 【课室卫生】:有一次性浴巾,无床单和漱口水 【周边环境】:小区旁边公寓 【综合打分】:7.5分 【综合评述】: {优势}:配合,胸大,桩起来舒服 {不足}:没有那么惊艳,水费稍高 【过程概述】:进门先看脸,老师颜值ok但没那么惊艳,御姐型,身材比…
Photo, posted without a caption
欧美的朋友圈 pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «欧美的朋友圈»
https://t.me/nanjingpd/6088
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @JIANGNINGXUANXUAN888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“欧美的朋友圈” (@JIANGNINGXUANXUAN888), 98 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JIANGNINGXUANXUAN888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.