Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for گـرار .

Channel

گـرار .

@JJJFXXX

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003075558622
TypeChannel
Username@JJJFXXX
Created9 September 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/JJJFXXX

Growth

50565323 August 2026 — 56 subscribers23 August 2026 — 56 subscribers24 August 2026 — 54 subscribers30 August 2026 — 55 subscribers8 September 2026 — 50 subscribers23 August 20268 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 22:1450-5
30 Aug 2026, 17:0855+1
24 Aug 2026, 06:2254-2
23 Aug 2026, 05:3056no change
23 Aug 2026, 05:1556first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 9 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 5 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5116410874038322622811.9%
custom 529646664050489252568.96%
custom 540456029005651682568.96%
custom 540482582640958963268.96%
custom 508512260422264599257.46%
custom 528499973924954595457.46%
custom 528749581103322176057.46%
custom 540436959350857286857.46%
custom 501714365286291997945.97%
custom 508724003598447612745.97%
custom 528529500536624269534.48%
custom 528736543730095393534.48%
custom 508735439807866619622.99%
custom 528510850500134978022.99%
custom 528749832358909371422.99%
custom 618589825805373292311.49%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52849997392495459541

11 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC138 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026

ضائج.

custom 51164108740383226223custom 52851085050013497801

7 May 2026, 04:43 UTC215 views32 reactionsread 23 August 2026

،

custom 50851226042226459925custom 51164108740383226225custom 50872400359844761274custom 54045602900565168254custom 54048258264095896324custom 52852950053662426953custom 52874958110332217602custom 52964666405048925252

6 May 2026, 07:26 UTC213 views29 reactionsread 23 August 2026

ً

custom 50171436528629199794custom 52964666405048925254custom 54043695935085728684custom 52849997392495459543custom 52874958110332217603custom 50873543980786661962custom 52873654373009539352custom 52874983235890937142

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @JJJFXXX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“گـرار .” (@JJJFXXX), 50 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JJJFXXX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.