独家数字大额招远控团队出金快能保留7m2w点位置顶名下有建设卡也可以 ✈️@qingti006

Channel
君临天下通知频道
@JLTXTZPD
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,520subscribers
-4,082 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002743137645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JLTXTZPD |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JLTXTZPD |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:21 | 6,520 | -99 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:58 | 6,619 | -42 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 6,661 | -244 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 6,905 | -310 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:30 | 7,215 | +13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 7,202 | +4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:14 | 7,198 | -46 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:44 | 7,244 | -88 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 7,332 | -48 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 03:38 | 7,380 | -130 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 07:59 | 7,510 | -895 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 8,405 | -297 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 8,702 | -530 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 9,232 | -652 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 9,884 | -143 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:53 | 10,027 | -130 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:08 | 10,157 | -59 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 10,216 | -100 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 10,316 | -70 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 10,386 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.731%
- avg views ÷ 6,520 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 47.7
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (11 August 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 143 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 06:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 282
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
iOS下载付云王者1298连刷丝滑大额w+必过 10/30王者水图部分如上 丝滑万+可查 支持支付宝花呗 微信 银行卡 信用卡 抖音月付 抖音绑卡支付 ✈️ :@mmzf888
Signed 漫漫(财务下发)
一手✅云王者iOS下载付ID扣1298 898连刷必过大额w+ 图不常发 每日核销20w+ 有苹果🐟直接来 包丝滑 ✈️ @mmzf888 公群链接:https://t.me/+mkXqqC6EJGA3MGI1
Signed 漫漫(财务下发)
苹果鱼打云王者ID扣1298丝滑连刷一直刷 一直刷 一直刷 不带控的 可以扣支付宝花呗 微信 信用卡 抖音绑卡支付 都是今天最新水图 包丝滑 包汇率冰点 价格可谈 有🐟来 无限吃量
❤1
Signed 漫漫(财务下发)
首次合作安排↘️28.8 🔼🔽↗️⏬↗️↙️↘️↘️↘️↙️ 全天24小时在线直奔主题 移动会议/webex一直正常 🥰🥰🥰🥰 一手后续在开 出水🥰🥰 🥰🥰📔😀 https://t.me/+sabBJ-uM-0oxNDE0
后续代打认准达利4040 https://t.me/+sabBJ-uM-0oxNDE0
后续代打认准达利4040 https://t.me/+sabBJ-uM-0oxNDE0
后续代打认准达利4040 https://t.me/+sabBJ-uM-0oxNDE0
后续代打认准达利4040 https://t.me/+sabBJ-uM-0oxNDE0
后续代打认准达利4040 https://t.me/+sabBJ-uM-0oxNDE0
后续代打认准达利4040 https://t.me/+sabBJ-uM-0oxNDE0
后续代打认准达利4040 https://t.me/+sabBJ-uM-0oxNDE0
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @JLTXTZPD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“君临天下通知频道” (@JLTXTZPD), 6,520 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JLTXTZPD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.