Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 综合曝光推广频道

Channel

综合曝光推广频道

@JPZ_88

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,251subscribers

-716 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002392159604
TypeChannel
Username@JPZ_88
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/JPZ_88

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

1.0 average views per post against 14,251 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.007%. Across the 2,570 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,020–31,610 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.64% and 9.46%, with a median of 4.00%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (11 August 2026 10 September 2026)
Posts measured62 of 62 published in the window (62 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled62
Mature posts only0.007% over 62 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers14,251 measured 8 September 2026
Cohortb10000:zho · 2,570 channels · p10 0.499% · p25 1.64% · p50 4.00% · p75 9.46% · p90 20.0%
Position in cohort0.039th percentile · 1/500 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.203% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageChinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 10 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

14,25114,96714,60911 August 2026 — 14,967 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,967 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,957 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,896 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,863 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,806 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,783 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,737 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,669 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,640 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,637 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,607 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,581 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,574 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,569 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,562 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,545 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,514 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,468 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,428 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,363 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,329 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,307 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,251 subscribers11 August 20268 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 28 days, net -716. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,144–15,074 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 08:1814,251-56
4 Sept 2026, 23:5814,307-22
3 Sept 2026, 08:5214,329-34
2 Sept 2026, 02:5614,363-65
1 Sept 2026, 01:5814,428-40
30 Aug 2026, 22:3414,468-46
29 Aug 2026, 18:5614,514-31
28 Aug 2026, 19:1214,545-17
27 Aug 2026, 15:4514,562-7
26 Aug 2026, 14:4814,569-5
25 Aug 2026, 14:5814,574-7
24 Aug 2026, 13:5414,581-26
22 Aug 2026, 23:4714,607-30
21 Aug 2026, 10:3514,637-3
20 Aug 2026, 12:3514,640-29
19 Aug 2026, 15:3614,669-68
18 Aug 2026, 14:1614,737-46
17 Aug 2026, 13:3814,783-23
16 Aug 2026, 08:1614,806-57
14 Aug 2026, 16:4714,863first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.007%
avg views ÷ 14,251 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
59
of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held69 (7 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total59
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 17s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#越南资讯:侦破XC726P偷渡专案 9人落网(含7名中国公民) 越南边防部队8月28日对外通报,于近日成功侦破代号为XC726P的组织非法出入境专案,全案共计抓获9名嫌疑人,其中7人为中国公民、2人为越南籍人员。 通报介绍,该案由越南边防侦察局牵头,联合庆和省、海防市、同奈省边防部队及地方公安联合办案。8月22日15时30分,办案人员在庆和省大岭乡一处加油站发现一辆形迹可疑的社会车辆,随即上前要求开展检查。该车司机拒不配合,驾车搭载两名外籍人员加速逃窜。专案组随即联动高速交警开展追捕,在云峰‑芽庄高速公路295公里处成功将车辆截停。 经现场核查确认,驾车男子为越南籍的陈清孝,车上另有两名中国公民。 审讯中,陈清孝供述,8月21日,他接到一名身份不明、据称身处柬埔寨的女子来电。对方以450万越南盾(约合172美元)佣金雇佣他,将两名中国公民从胡志明市转运至嘉莱省一处路口交予他人,尚未完成交付便被专案组查获。 办案部门根

30 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

明知可能从事违法活动仍赴柬埔寨参与电诈,厦门同安6名男子因诈骗罪获刑 近日,厦门市同安区人民检察院审查起诉了一起跨境电信网络诈骗案件。6名男子明知境外“高薪工作”可能涉及违法犯罪,仍以旅游为名出境前往柬埔寨,参与电信网络诈骗活动,最终均因犯诈骗罪被判处有期徒刑并处罚金。 2023年初,曾某某等5人在汪某某的诱惑和鼓动下,决定前往境外务工。6人明知前往柬埔寨后大概率会从事违法犯罪活动,仍以出境旅游为由办理护照,并分批从厦门乘机前往柬埔寨。 抵达境外诈骗窝点后,6人的护照被统一收缴。经过短期诈骗话术培训后,他们被安排从事电信诈骗业务,工作时间从数月到一年多不等,个人非法获利数千元至数万元 冒充“投资大师”“美女助理”实施诈骗 该团伙主要针对韩国、日本民众,实施跨境投资理财类诈骗。团伙通过境外软件上的翻译人员进行沟通,再将翻译后的诈骗话术发送给被害人。 诈骗团伙分工明确,先通过注册社交账号、发布图片和短视频等方式,包装“投资

30 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

最近几个月大家千万不要回国,回去就出不来! #网友投稿:这两天我看到一个新闻应该是真的,好几个地方都有说!就是8/12号的时候,有一个航班是从上海飞日本的,200多个去日本的中国人,就他妈的上去两个!其他人都被卡了! 还有8/13号从成都飞美国的航班,卡了一半中国人。全部被要求接受检查电子设备,是所有电子设备,你不给锁屏密码就不给你登机牌,不让出境。 美国和日本又不是敏感国家,都卡成这逼样。那你们想想如果你回国了,再想出来去东南亚会怎么样?再加上你之前多年在东南亚的记录,那百分百会不让出,不止不让出,我觉得还会被剪护照,拉入入境黑名单 9月15还没到,但是国内各大机场已经开始执行出境管控政策了,大家不要撞枪口,先观望吧,近期没特殊事情别冒险回国。

30 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#泰国资讯:甘烹碧府绑架案告破 中国女子获救回国 8月28日,泰国甘烹碧府警方通报,此前遭团伙绑架的中国女子已安全获救并启程回国。 8月23日,该女子在曼谷遭多名男子控制上车,被绑后试图开往达府湄索边境。途经甘烹碧府检查站时,女子曾呼救未果,嫌犯冲卡逃逸。女子伺机跳车向民众求助,警方随即将其送医并安排中文翻译协助。 警方先后逮捕多名嫌犯,均否认指控。目前案件仍在扩大调查,以追查幕后网络。当地警察局长还自掏腰包为受害者购买机票,助其顺利回国。

29 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#国内资讯:北京警方今年打掉170个涉诈窝点和团伙,截获6200余万元现金及19.51公斤黄金 8月27日发布的北京警方最新反诈数据显示,今年以来,北京电信网络诈骗发案数和群众财产损失金额同比均下降超过50%。 北京市公安局刑侦部门8月26日介绍,今年以来,警方持续打击涉诈电话卡、银行卡以及人员、资金转移链条,累计打掉170个涉诈窝点和团伙。 针对诈骗资金由线上转账向线下现金、黄金等实物转移的新变化,北京警方开展专项打击,目前已抓获460余名涉诈资金线下转运嫌疑人,打掉73个涉诈资金转运车队,截获现金6200余万元、黄金19.51公斤。 警方同时加强涉诈风险预警和劝阻,将预警信息按照紧急、高、中、低四个等级进行处置,通过96110反诈专线、短信、智能语音和上门劝阻等方式及时干预。今年以来,已避免群众潜在损失超过40亿元。 今年3月,丰台警方在一起虚假投资诈骗预警中及时介入,阻止一名群众继续转账,避免潜在损失700万元。8

29 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

20岁男子死在了飞机起落架舱内 昨天早晨6时55分,马来西亚吉隆坡国际机场第二航站楼,一架从日本东京飞抵的航班内,工程人员因闻到异味打开起落架舱门,意外发现一具男尸。 初步调查显示,死者年约20多岁,身穿白衣牛仔裤,身上未携带任何身份证件,推测已死亡超72小时。目前死者身份及国籍尚无法确认,警方法医团队已封锁现场展开深入调查,以厘清具体死因。 死亡时间超过72小时, 所以他其实在这架飞机上 很可能已经飞了好几个来回

27 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#老挝资讯:老挝全国登革热病例升至4371例,卫生部门持续加强防控 老挝卫生部门最新数据显示,全国累计已报告4371例登革热病例,相关病例分布在多个省市。随着雨季持续,部分地区蚊媒密度上升,登革热传播风险仍处于较高水平。 卫生部门表示,目前正继续加强病例监测、社区灭蚊及积水清理工作,并要求各地重点排查居民区、学校、市场及建筑工地等容易滋生伊蚊的区域。 当地医疗机构同时提醒,民众如出现持续高烧、剧烈头痛、肌肉关节疼痛、皮疹或异常出血等症状,应尽快前往医院检查,避免自行长期服药耽误治疗。 目前,老挝方面仍在持续更新各省病例数据和重点疫情区域,后续防控工作将根据雨季传播情况进一步调整。

27 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:两名从戈公省警察临时拘留中心逃脱的中国籍嫌疑人被抓获押回 戈公省警方联合西哈努克省、特本克蒙省等地警方展开追捕行动,成功将两名此前从戈公省警察总部临时拘留中心逃脱的中国籍嫌疑人抓获。目前,两人已被押送至戈公省警察总部接受进一步处理。 8月27日下午,戈公省警察总部代理负责人孙谦中将证实,两名被抓获嫌疑人的身份分别为:苏峰,男,1978年出生,中国籍;以及一名姓“比”的中国籍男子。 据警方介绍,2026年8月21日凌晨,一名1991年出生、名叫“瑞”的中国籍男子曾破坏戈公省警察总部临时拘留中心窗户后逃离。 事件发生后,戈公省警方立即协调相关省份警方展开联合追捕。经过持续调查和搜寻,警方于2026年8月26日成功锁定两名逃脱嫌疑人的行踪。 当天6时33分,执法人员在西哈努克省西哈努克市4号村Visin娱乐中心大楼内发现一名嫌疑人。该嫌疑人在躲避警方追捕过程中,从大楼三楼跳下受伤。 随后,该男子被紧急送往西哈

27 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

上海警方侦破特大地下钱庄案:利用虚拟货币跨境换汇,涉案近200亿元 8月27日,中国上海市公安局召开新闻发布会,对外介绍全市严打涉虚拟货币新型经济犯罪的阶段性战果。 今年以来,上海公安经侦部门连续侦破多起利用虚拟货币实施非法经营、洗钱的犯罪案件,累计抓获犯罪嫌疑人70余名,所有案件合并统计涉案金额超200亿元。 发布会上,警方专门公布其中一起特大跨境非法经营地下钱庄典型个案:该案件抓获犯罪嫌疑人19名,仅这一起地下钱庄案件,涉案金额就接近200亿元。 针对这起案件,上海公安经侦部门早在2026年1月就通过网络巡查,发现网上有人推广换汇业务,随即对该线索启动立案侦查工作。 经查,自2024年8月起,刘某、徐某、高某、王某等团伙成员,未获得国家主管部门批准,以虚拟货币作为结算载体,线上线下招揽客户。团伙采用境内外资金“对敲”模式,非法完成人民币与外币的兑换,并按交易比例收取服务费牟利。 该团伙内部架构清晰、分工明确:刘某

26 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

#网友投稿:老挝万象“三江”这几天街上到处都是便衣警察,昨天下午一名狗推走在街上被便衣认出来,当街被按走了,多事之秋,各位都小心点!

25 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

#国内新闻:西双版纳成功打掉组织偷渡出境电信诈骗团伙 71名违法犯罪嫌疑人全部到案 8月25日,云南西双版纳边境管理支队成功侦破一起特大组织偷渡出境案件,依法将涉及电信网络诈骗活动的71名违法犯罪嫌疑人全部抓获归案。 案件线索始于2025年4月。警方通过研判发现,一以葛某、代某等人为核心,与境外“蛇头”勾结的组织偷渡团伙逐渐浮出水面。该团伙通过高价招募网约车司机,以正常线上车费四至五倍的费用运送人员,并让部分司机发展下线,从层层转包的车费中抽取佣金。 为逃避监管,组织者利用网约车平台远程下单,将偷渡人员包装成普通乘客。司机接人后脱离平台监管,采用分段载客方式,将人员分批从各地运往云南边境,再组织非法出境。 专案组依据异常订单等线索,锁定涉案人员,并在浙江绍兴、四川宜宾等地展开抓捕行动。主要嫌疑人代某在同伙相继落网后曾逃入山林藏匿,最终在警方和家属规劝下主动投案。 经过9个月的延伸侦查及12次跨省抓捕行动,横跨浙江、贵州

25 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#泰国资讯:警方破获诈骗团伙:以为是“华人诈骗集团”,没想到泰国人学成归来成为盘总 8月25日——长期以来,泰国社会对网络诈骗的关注,往往集中在所谓的“华人诈骗集团”。然而,泰国警方近日侦破的一起案件,却揭开了另一面:部分泰国人曾参与境外诈骗活动,在掌握成熟的诈骗手法后,不仅继续从事诈骗,还逐渐成为团伙中的重要成员。 这起案件最初并不是从网络诈骗开始,而是警方调查一起DU品案件时,意外发现了背后的诈骗资金网络。 警方调查过程中发现,一对男女频繁携带大量现金,在曼谷多个地点之间往返,并不断通过ATM机进行现金交易。同时,两人几乎一直查看手机聊天信息,行动方式疑似受到幕后人员远程指挥。 警方进一步追查后发现,两人涉嫌充当诈骗团伙的“资金车手”,负责按照上游人员的指令提取诈骗所得,再通过不同账户进行转移。 更令人意外的是,其中一名嫌疑人此前曾前往柬埔寨西哈努克省工作,并在那里参与网络诈骗。 嫌疑人向警方供述,自己过去曾参与

Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @JPZ_88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“综合曝光推广频道” (@JPZ_88), 14,251 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JPZ_88.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.