Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,913–5,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:01
5,920
-8
11 Sept 2026, 17:56
5,928
-8
7 Sept 2026, 10:56
5,936
-8
2 Sept 2026, 23:23
5,944
-3
30 Aug 2026, 19:09
5,947
+1
27 Aug 2026, 11:33
5,946
-4
24 Aug 2026, 09:56
5,950
-4
20 Aug 2026, 22:03
5,954
-3
18 Aug 2026, 03:15
5,957
-3
15 Aug 2026, 00:03
5,960
-2
11 Aug 2026, 07:42
5,962
-6
8 Aug 2026, 00:14
5,968
+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:00
5,967
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:55
5,967
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
41m 14s
Average length
2m 17s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
622 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
195
31.4%
🔥
150
24.1%
💯
138
22.2%
❤
36
5.79%
👏
35
5.63%
👌
20
3.22%
👎
18
2.89%
😁
16
2.57%
😢
14
2.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 622 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12360
12min 27mb video
Tohto človeka si zo srdca vážim pre jeho ľudskosť a schopnosť pomenovať veci tak ako sú..
Zdroj
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1JsP5Q51Lb
Suvis
https://t.me/JScovid1984/1177 👍
https://t.me/JScovid1984/7030
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12355 ‼️
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12359
5min 9mb video
Bilióny dolárov z vakcinácie a celé by to mal pokaziť IVEKMEKTIN na ktorý nikto nemá patent?!
Viete, koľko ich to stálo, aby celú túto kampaň zorganizovali? A vy by ste im to chceli pokaziť lacným liekom na svrab?
Miliardy dali na výrobu biologickej zbrane efemisticky nazvanej "vírus", desiatky miliárd na podplácanie novinárov a politikov..
Suvis
http://t.me/JScovid19…
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12358
1min 7mb video
RF má zo skúseností historické právo nedôverovať svojim západným "priateľom"
Suvis
https://t.me/JScovid1984/9709
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12357
2min 6mb video
Bola špeciálna operácia Ruskej Federácie na Ukrajine nečakaná, alebo vyprovokovaná?!
Rusofóbovia sa snažia presvedčať, že ide o "bezdôvodnú" agresiu RF voči UA
Je tomu skutočne tak?
Nazor nech si urobí každý sám..
Suvis
https://t.me/JScovid1984/4678
https://t.me/JScovid1984/7308
https://t.me/jscovid1984/7357
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12356
3min 12mb video
Fauci je zločinec - vsetci vakcínu chtiví ludia sa odvolávali na jeho vyjadrenia ako údajne "najvyššej autority"
Suvis
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12355
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12355
2min 14mb video
Zločinec Fauci aj po udeleni "preventivnej" milosti od bývaleho prezidenta Bidena pohrda súdom a odmieta vypovedať
Suvis
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12354
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12353
Fauci je zločinec..
Prve video - Fauci tvrdí ze ak by dostal príležitosť tak nema problem vysvetliť
Druhe video - odmieta príležitosť vysvetliť
Suvis
https://t.me/JScovid1984/3060
https://t.me/JScovid1984/3135
https://t.me/JScovid1984/3286
https://t.me/JScovid1984/10508
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12351
2min 5mb video
Ideológia a presvedčenie nikdy realitu neporazí.. Bez ruského plynu nastáva deindustrializácia a nekonkurencieschopnosť EU
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12350
Hlavné je nekupovať ruský plyn priamo potrubím a lacno.. fuj, fuj, podporuje sa tým "vojna"
Nakupovať ten istý plyn s dovoznou prirážkou a tankermi nehladiac na emisie je v poriadku, je to sice stale plyn z RF ale extra prirážka z neho robí plyn ktorým sa nepodporuje "vojna"
Pokrytci
Zdroj
https://sita.sk/venergetike/takmer-vsetky-dodavky-ruskeho-skvapalneneho-zemneho-plynu-z-te…
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12349
2min 8mb video
Amerika bohatne a vďaka amerikou skorumpovaným politikom to EU opäť zaplatí
Cui bono?!
Komu to prospieva?!
V čí prospech sa to deje?!
Suvis
https://t.me/JScovid1984/4517 👈👈
https://t.me/JScovid1984/4674
https://t.me/JScovid1984/8183
https://t.me/JScovid1984/9569
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12348
https://t.me/JScovid1984/12348
1min 9mb video
Amerika rozpútala 2 svetovu vojnu (vid kniha WHO FINANCED HITLER) aby z nej zbohatla a skutočne aj zbohatla.. To iste chce zopakovať opäť a zatiaľ sa im to darí..
Tu sú najčastejšie uvádzané prípady, ktoré sú aj v knihe Who Financed Hitler:
- Henry Ford — známy antisemitizmom; jeho spisy Hitler citoval. Ford Motor Company mala fabriku v Nemecku.
- IBM — dodávala dier…
❤6👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @JScovid1984. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@JScovid1984 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
DannyKollar / hlavný kanál @dannykollar · 53,176 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 September 2026
Ľuboš Blaha @LubosBlahaSmer · 35,472 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Casus Belli Live @casusbellilive · 40,112 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
CZ24.NEWS @cz24news · 29,438 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
InfoVojna @InfoVojnaOfficial · 49,118 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
ZEM&VEK @zemavek · 32,685 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
neČT24 @neCT24 · 32,485 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Covid1984 budujú svet podľa Georga Orwella - na životoch neočkovaných záleží” (@JScovid1984), 5,920 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JScovid1984.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.