📢售后渠道调整通知 各位用户请注意! 即日起,所有售后问题统一转至 QQ 售后群处理,TG 售后不再受理任何售后问题。 🐧QQ 售后群:1132641361 ⚠️请各位及时调整售后联系渠道,遇到任何账号问题,请直接前往 QQ 售后群联系处理。 ❌ 请勿再联系 TG 售后,TG 私聊将不再处理售后问题! 感谢大家的理解与配合!
👍20
Signed 洛少-鸡太美客服

Channel
@JTMDKNB
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
38,580subscribers
-1,457 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002496201058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JTMDKNB |
| Description | 官网浏览器搜: 鸡太美.com 鸡太美数据号交流群: @zcjtmjlq 😍 91福利视频: @fulishipin91bot |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JTMDKNB |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 38,580 | -38 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 38,618 | -20 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 38,638 | -22 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 38,660 | -27 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 38,687 | -30 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 38,717 | -59 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 38,776 | -25 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 38,801 | -47 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 38,848 | -34 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 38,882 | -12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 38,894 | -26 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 38,920 | -19 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 38,939 | -27 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:29 | 38,966 | -17 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 38,983 | -44 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:39 | 39,027 | -88 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:41 | 39,115 | -68 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 10:41 | 39,183 | -151 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 39,334 | -112 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 39,446 | first reading |
369 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 369 (10 August 2026 – 29 October 2026) |
| Views total | 45,348 |
| Reactions total | 2,907 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Oct 2026, 00:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,590 reactions across 368 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5,327 | 95.3% | |
| ❤ | 201 | 3.60% | |
| 🤔 | 24 | 0.429% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 0.304% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 0.125% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.089% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.018% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.018% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.018% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.018% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.018% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.018% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.018% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.018% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.018% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 369 of the 369 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,590 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 369 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @JTMDKNB. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 369 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 August 2026 to 29 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📢售后渠道调整通知 各位用户请注意! 即日起,所有售后问题统一转至 QQ 售后群处理,TG 售后不再受理任何售后问题。 🐧QQ 售后群:1132641361 ⚠️请各位及时调整售后联系渠道,遇到任何账号问题,请直接前往 QQ 售后群联系处理。 ❌ 请勿再联系 TG 售后,TG 私聊将不再处理售后问题! 感谢大家的理解与配合!
👍20
Signed 洛少-鸡太美客服
📢PRO无限授权号 · 上架通知 🔥PRO无限授权号正式上架! ✅库存已补充,现已开放下单! 🚀有需要的兄弟可以直接冲,库存有限,先到先得! 🛒下单地址: https://tcfk.shrtxs.cn/shop/jtm ✈️售后客服: @jtmsjh
👍25
Signed 洛少-鸡太美客服
🔥爷青回!ACE 授权号重磅回归! 📢阔别多年,曾经的 ACE 授权号 终于再度上架! 🔥老玩家应该都知道,懂的都懂! 🚀多年未见,如今正式回归,有需要的兄弟可以冲了! 🛒下单地址: https://tcfk.shrtxs.cn/shop/jtm ⚠️售后须知: 仅包首次登录问题,付款前至验号结束务必全程录屏!
👍17
Signed 洛少-鸡太美客服
🔥爷青回!ACE 授权号重磅回归! 📢阔别多年,曾经的 ACE 授权号 终于再度上架! 🔥老玩家应该都知道,懂的都懂! 🚀多年未见,如今正式回归,有需要的兄弟可以冲了! 🛒下单地址: https://tcfk.shrtxs.cn/shop/jtm ⚠️售后须知: 仅包首次登录问题,付款前至验号结束务必全程录屏!
👍21
Signed 洛少-鸡太美客服
🚀NT美化免Root V1.2 正式更新! 📢本次更新内容: 1️⃣修复部分用户使用时出现的延迟问题 2️⃣修复雷达功能不生效的问题 3️⃣优化绘制性能,运行更加流畅 4️⃣优化美化效果,游戏内二落依然有效果 5️⃣修复旧版本多个已知问题,进一步提升整体稳定性 🔥旧版本问题较多,建议大家尽快更新至最新 V1.2 版本! ☁️NT美化免Root V1.2 下载地址: https://www.lanzouv.com/b0o0g0zxe 📢NT美化官方频道:@NTMHB ❤️最新版本及更新通知,请关注官方频道!
👍15
Signed 洛少
🔥数据号已补充库存,现已上架! ✅售后保障:包首次登录,首次登录遇到任何问题均可联系售后处理! 🎥重要提醒:付款前开始录屏,直到上号、验号结束,必须全程完整录制!无完整录屏不予售后! ⚠️数据号容易触发 IP 及设备环境检测,设备环境不干净的,不建议购买! 🛒购买地址: https://tcfk.shrtxs.cn/shop/jtm 请确认了解以上规则后再下单!
👍43🤔1
Signed 洛少
📢库存补货通知 授权号、QQ直登号 ✅已补充库存! 有需要的兄弟可以直接下单,库存已恢复,先到先得🔥 🤘下单地址 https://tcfk.shrtxs.cn/shop/jtm ✔️TG售后客服: @jtmsjh
👍46❤1😘1
Signed 洛少
📣通知: 微扫码账号目前注册需要人脸核验,暂时没法售卖;QQ直登账号这两天会安排上架,大家耐心等一等,上架第一时间通知各位
👍47
Signed 洛少
⚠️鸡太美卡网|防骗提醒 近期冒充鸡太美卡网的网站和账号较多,请大家提高警惕,谨防被骗! 🌐 认准官网: 鸡太美.com 请仔细核对域名,切勿轻信仿冒网站和陌生私信! ✔️频道发的卡网也是真的不要乱进入其他网站
👍62
Signed 洛少
📢库存补货通知 授权号、数据号、QQ直登号、V扫码 ✅已补充库存! 有需要的兄弟可以直接下单,库存已恢复,先到先得🔥 🤘下单地址 https://tcfk.shrtxs.cn/shop/jtm ✔️TG售后客服: @jtmsjh
👍50
Signed 洛少
📢库存补货通知 授权号、数据号、QQ直登号、V扫码 ✅已补充库存! 有需要的兄弟可以直接下单,库存已恢复,先到先得🔥 🤘下单地址 https://tcfk.shrtxs.cn/shop/jtm ✔️TG售后客服: @jtmsjh
👍62
Signed 洛少
Photo, posted without a caption
👍67
Signed 洛少
Showing the 12 most recent of 369 posts we hold for @JTMDKNB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@JTMDKNB edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“鸡太美项目频道” (@JTMDKNB), 38,580 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JTMDKNB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.