Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [คลังสำรอง] หลวงพี่จัสติน

Channel

[คลังสำรอง] หลวงพี่จัสติน

@JWDYMVIII

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

67,486subscribers

+66,385 since we began measuring on 2 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003770372612
TypeChannel
Username@JWDYMVIII
Descriptionจุดรวมพล - @AssemblyPointWDUM ติดต่อแอดมิน | @JWDYM2
Created2 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded2 October 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/JWDYMVIII

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

65,600 average views per post against 67,486 subscribers — an engagement rate of 97.2%. Across the 23,754 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,988 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.63% and 15.0%, with a median of 6.76%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (27 September 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Posts measured51 of 54 published in the window (0 exact, 51 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,345,460
Mature posts only101.0% over 49 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers67,486 measured 27 October 2026
Cohortb31623 · 23,754 channels · p10 0.807% · p25 2.63% · p50 6.76% · p75 15.0% · p90 27.2%
Position in cohort99.705th percentile · 14.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.006% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageThai · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,10167,48634,293.52 October 2026 — 1,101 subscribers2 October 2026 — 1,101 subscribers6 October 2026 — 17,977 subscribers10 October 2026 — 37,543 subscribers13 October 2026 — 47,131 subscribers15 October 2026 — 50,393 subscribers16 October 2026 — 53,461 subscribers17 October 2026 — 55,476 subscribers18 October 2026 — 57,231 subscribers18 October 2026 — 59,748 subscribers19 October 2026 — 61,866 subscribers20 October 2026 — 63,739 subscribers22 October 2026 — 65,030 subscribers23 October 2026 — 65,939 subscribers24 October 2026 — 66,477 subscribers25 October 2026 — 66,953 subscribers26 October 2026 — 67,106 subscribers27 October 2026 — 67,486 subscribers2 October 202627 October 2026
18 measurements spanning 25 days, net +66,385. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 01:4867,486+380
26 Oct 2026, 05:1667,106+153
25 Oct 2026, 06:3666,953+476
24 Oct 2026, 06:2966,477+538
23 Oct 2026, 09:3465,939+909
22 Oct 2026, 07:1865,030+1,291
20 Oct 2026, 21:4963,739+1,873
19 Oct 2026, 21:1661,866+2,118
18 Oct 2026, 23:4159,748+2,517
18 Oct 2026, 02:4657,231+1,755
17 Oct 2026, 06:1655,476+2,015
16 Oct 2026, 05:1853,461+3,068
15 Oct 2026, 02:2850,393+3,262
13 Oct 2026, 23:5047,131+9,588
10 Oct 2026, 21:5637,543+19,566
6 Oct 2026, 19:1817,977+16,876
2 Oct 2026, 12:221,101no change
2 Oct 2026, 11:471,101first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 2 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
98.2%
avg views ÷ 67,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
66,300
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held54 (2 October 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total3,380,860
Reactions total5,750
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Oct 2026, 01:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
43
Videos
9
Links
53

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 05s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,750 reactions across 52 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,750100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,750 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
252
across the posts below
Posts paid on
38
of 52 we hold a reading for · 73%
Most on one post
128
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @JWDYMVIII. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 October 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Oct 2026, 17:39 UTC≈46,700 views87 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Video

⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤87

23 Oct 2026, 04:56 UTC≈51,400 views70 reactions2 Starsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤70

22 Oct 2026, 20:57 UTC≈53,000 views70 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤70

22 Oct 2026, 15:17 UTC≈54,300 views48 reactions2 Starsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🔤..สำรอง..2🔤 ⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤48

22 Oct 2026, 08:23 UTC≈53,900 views60 reactions5 Starsread 28 October 2026
Video

🔤..สำรอง..2🔤 ⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤60

22 Oct 2026, 03:52 UTC≈52,600 views44 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤44

20 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC≈57,300 views85 reactions4 Starsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤85

20 Oct 2026, 19:18 UTC≈58,100 views62 reactions1 Starread 28 October 2026
Video

⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤62

20 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC≈56,600 views66 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🔤..สำรอง..2🔤 ⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤66

19 Oct 2026, 20:30 UTC≈62,400 views78 reactions2 Starsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤78

19 Oct 2026, 19:00 UTC≈59,900 views71 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🔤..สำรอง..2🔤 ⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤71

19 Oct 2026, 16:55 UTC≈59,100 views50 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🔤..สำรอง..2🔤 ⬇️....รับพร....⬇️

❤50

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @JWDYMVIII. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[คลังสำรอง] หลวงพี่จัสติน” (@JWDYMVIII), 67,486 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JWDYMVIII.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.