Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for แฏ“|โ€ข๐€๐๐€๐’. ู„ู€ู€

Channel

แฏ“|โ€ข๐€๐๐€๐’. ู„ู€ู€

@J_16S

Not marked by Telegram, checked 14 September 2026

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

373subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002228190459
TypeChannel
Username@J_16S
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/J_16S

Growth

37337537413 Sept 2026, 00:47 โ€” 375 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 01:22 โ€” 375 subscribers14 Sept 2026, 06:41 โ€” 373 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 00:4714 Sept 2026, 06:41
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 373โ€“375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 06:41373-2
13 Sept 2026, 01:22375no change
13 Sept 2026, 00:47375first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
2.47%
avg views รท 373 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.2
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
42.4%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held20 (19 August 2026 โ€“ 10 September 2026)
Views total184
Reactions total78
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค7798.7%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ11.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 20:56 UTC4 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @FDFIF

ุงุนุฏุงุฆูŠ ุงุชู…ู†ุง ู„ฺฉู… ุงู„ุนุฒ ุงู…ุง ุงู„ุฐู„ ุงู†ุชู… ููŠู‡๐“†ฐ๐“ƒ ๐’‚โ€Œ๐’Žโ€Œ๐’†โ€Œ๐’“โ€Œูก..๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ–ค

โค3

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

10 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC4 views4 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Posted without readable text

โค4

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

8 Sept 2026, 19:28 UTC4 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @FDFIF

ุงู…ุชู„ูƒ ุงุฎุทุฑ ู…ู‡ุงุฑู‡ ุนู„ู‰ ุงู„ุฅุทู„ุงู‚ ุงุนูŠุฏ ุงู„ุฃุดูŠุงุก ุงู„ู‰ ุงู„ุตูุฑ ูˆ ูƒุฃู†ู‡ุง ู„ู… ุชูƒู†๐“†ฐ๐“ƒ ๐’‚โ€Œ๐’Žโ€Œ๐’†โ€Œ๐’“โ€Œูก..๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ–ค

โค3

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

8 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC4 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Posted without readable text

โค3

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

7 Sept 2026, 00:42 UTC6 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @FDFIF

ุณู„ุงู…ูŠ ุงูˆู„ุงู‹ ูˆู„ูŠุญุชุฑู‚ ู…ุง ูˆุฑุงุก ุฐู„ูƒ๐“†ฐ๐“ƒ ๐’‚โ€Œ๐’Žโ€Œ๐’†โ€Œ๐’“โ€Œูก..๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ–ค

โค3

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

7 Sept 2026, 00:40 UTC7 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Posted without readable text

โค3

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

3 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC10 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @FDFIF

ูˆููŠ ูŠูˆู… ุงู„ุฎู…ูŠุณ ุงู„ู„ู‡ู… ุงู†ูŠ ุงุนูˆุฐุจูƒ ู…ู† ุบู„ุจุฉ ุงู„ุจุฎูˆุฑ..๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ูˆู‚ู‡ุฑ ุงู„ุนุฒุงุจ ูˆุงุฎุชูุงุก ุงู„ุงุตุญุงุจ ูˆุถุนู ุงู„ู†ุช๐“†ฐ๐“ƒ ๐’‚โ€Œ๐’Žโ€Œ๐’†โ€Œ๐’“โ€Œูก..๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ–ค

โค3

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

3 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC9 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Posted without readable text

โค2

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

1 Sept 2026, 20:43 UTC10 views4 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @FDFIF

ุงู†ุง ุงู„ูˆุงู‚ุน ุงู„ุฐูŠ ูŠุฒุนุฌ ุฎูŠุงู„ูƒ ุงู„ุนุงุฌุฒ๐“†ฐ๐“ƒ ๐’‚โ€Œ๐’Žโ€Œ๐’†โ€Œ๐’“โ€Œูก..๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ–ค

โค4

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

1 Sept 2026, 20:34 UTC11 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Posted without readable text

โค2

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

30 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @FFCFO

โœจูŠูˆุฑุฒุงุช ูุฎู…ู‡ ู„ู„ุจูŠุน ูˆุงุฑุฎุต ุงู„ุงุณุนุงุฑโœ…๐Ÿ”ฅ โœจ @E22Y2 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @C22Y2 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @E22Y3 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @E22J2 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @K5S55 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @Y6S66 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @B44Y4 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @N5A55 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @Y2G22 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @I2G22 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @D2G22 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @M2G22 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @V2J22 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจ @V2N22 ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ†“ โœจู„ู„ุดุฑุงุก ุชุนุงู„ ูˆู…ุงุนู„ูŠูƒ ุจุงู„ุณุนุฑ ุงุจุดุฑ ุจุงู‚ู„ ุงู„ุงุณุนุงุฑโญ๐Ÿ’€ โœจูŠูˆุฒุฑูŠ ู„ู„ุชูˆุงุตู„ โฌ๐Ÿ’ฐ โœจ @FDFFY ๐Ÿงธ

โค2

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

30 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC10 views6 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Posted without readable text

โค6

Signed โ™ชู†ุจุฐุฉ ุจุงูŠูˆ โˆš ูŽ,

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @J_16S. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ุฌูŽุจุฑ .
@rro_orri ยท 26,171
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here โ€” alongside 61 others โ€” read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œแฏ“|โ€ข๐€๐๐€๐’. ู„ู€ู€โ€ (@J_16S), 373 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/J_16S.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.