جدی چی به سر این وینیسیوس اومد؟ #Jimi @Jag_sport

Channel
⚽️Jag Sport
@Jag_Sport
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,642subscribers
-708 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001465613105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Jag_Sport |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Jag_Sport |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:01 | 11,642 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:51 | 11,644 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:58 | 11,649 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:59 | 11,652 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:38 | 11,656 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:09 | 11,662 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 11,669 | -9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 11,678 | -11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:09 | 11,689 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 11,695 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 11,705 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 11,708 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 11,717 | -10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 11,727 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 11,729 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 11,739 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 11,742 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 11,744 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 11,748 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:44 | 11,756 | first reading |
Engagement
706 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.33%
- avg views ÷ 11,642 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 737
- 127 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.53%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 127
- of 706 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 102 of 127 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 706 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 93,549 |
| Reactions total | 1,753 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 08m
- Average length
- 50s
Measured directly from 82 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,314 reactions across 520 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 3,003 | 32.2% | |
| ❤ | 2,538 | 27.2% | |
| 🔥 | 1,143 | 12.3% | |
| 💔 | 778 | 8.35% | |
| 👍 | 640 | 6.87% | |
| ❤🔥 | 312 | 3.35% | |
| 😐 | 207 | 2.22% | |
| 👎 | 184 | 1.98% | |
| 🖕 | 176 | 1.89% | |
| 🤬 | 72 | 0.773% | |
| 🍌 | 66 | 0.709% | |
| 🤡 | 62 | 0.666% | |
| 🫡 | 27 | 0.29% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 0.247% | |
| 🤝 | 19 | 0.204% | |
| 🌭 | 18 | 0.193% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 0.14% | |
| 🗿 | 11 | 0.118% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.075% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.043% | |
| 4 further kinds | 11 | 0.118% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 529 of the 706 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,314 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 706 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 127 posts held from the last 30 days (3.94%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
پست گریزمان در اینستاگرام 😐😂😂😂 #Jimi @Jag_sport
😐10🤣6
نیکو پاز در این فصل آمار 18 گل و پاس گل داشته که بین هافبک های پنج لیگ معتبر بهترین آمارو داره 🔥 #Jimi @Jag_sport
❤2🔥1
پشمام این چه کصشریه باز 🚨رسمی؛ بازی برگشت اتلتیکو مادرید - بارسلونا تو لالیگا بخاطر سوپرکاپ جلو افتاد، این بازی قرار بود ۷ فوریه ۲۰۲۷ برگزار بشه اما جلو افتاد و باید ۲ دسامبر ۲۰۲۶ یا همون آذر ماه با هم بازی کنند. یعنی بارسا قبل تموم شدن نیم فصلِ اول، بازی رفت و برگشت رو با اتلتیکو انجام میده😐😐😐 یعنی مجبوره تو ۹ روز، ۴ بازی انجام بده 😐 #Jimi @Jag_sport
🤬17🤣5
مایکل اولیسه چند وقت پیش گفته بود دوس دارم رسانه یامال رو داشته باشم؛ حالا عملکردش تو بازیای بزرگ: ❌ مقابل بارسا - 0 گل و پاسگل ❌ مقابل پاریس - 0 گل و پاسگل ❌ مقابل اینتر - 0 گل و پاسگل ❌ مقابل اینتر - 0 گل و پاسگل ❌ مقابل اسپانیا - 0 گل و پاسگل ❌ مقابل پاریس - 0 گل و پاسگل ❌ مقابل چلسی - 0 گل و پاسگل ❌ مقابل پاریس - 0 گل و پاسگل ❌ مقابل آرسنال - 0 گل و پاسگل ⚽️ مقابل رئال - 1 گل و پاسگل ⚽️ مقابل رئال - 1 گ…
🤣11
و حالا ما تازه معنی این سکانس معروف وایکینگها رو متوجه میشیم... #Jimi @Jag_sport
❤10🤣4
🔻لواندوفسکی: بعد از بارسلونا، نمیتونستم خودم رو تو هیچ تیم دیگهای در اروپا تصور کنم. #Jimi @Jag_sport
💔31🤣4
با تیم من، تا روزی 100 یورو درآمد کسب کن ✅ https://t.me/+adtFpIbzyC42N2Rk https://t.me/+adtFpIbzyC42N2Rk https://t.me/+adtFpIbzyC42N2Rk
🇸🇪 ایساک لیندبرگ هستم 🎩 ⚽️ سالهاست مسابقات ورزشی رو دنبال و تحلیل میکنم و حالا فرمهای خودم رو برای فارسیزبانها منتشر میکنم. 🇮🇷🤝🇸🇪 🔥 اینجا خبری از انتخابهای شانسی نیست؛ تحلیل، بررسی آمار و مدیریت سرمایه، پایه کار ماست. 💶 با ISAK BET قدمبهقدم همراه باش و خودت عملکرد فرمها رو ببین. ⚠️ هیچ فرمی تضمینی نیست؛ همیشه با مدیریت سرمایه وارد شوید. 📎 عضویت در کانال VIP: .https://t.me/+adtFpIbzyC42N2Rk https://t.me/…
مسی ۱۸٪ از جام های تاریخ ارژانتین رو برده رونالدو ۱۰۰٪ جام های تاریخ پرتغال. مسی بخشی از تاریخ فوتبال آرژانتینه اما کریستیانو تمام تاریخ فوتبال پرتغال. #Jimi @Jag_sport
🤣34❤29🤝5
📊 100 ورزشکار برتر تاریخ از نگاه نشریه SFA ⚪️ مایکل جردن اول ⚪️ لیونل مسی سوم ⚪️ کریستیانو رونالدو چهاردهم #Narcis @jag_sport
❤20👎16
🚨 فوووووووری: امروز وینیسیوس تو تمرینات رئال مادرید نرفته و غایب بوده! #Jimi @Jag_sport
👏9🤣7❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 706 posts we hold for @Jag_Sport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 12 posts on @Jag_Sport as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 24 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 18 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@wepari2 · 5,00138 postsآموزش لاین بت
@global_line10 · 1,27814 postsWinro.io
@winro_io · 8,6798 posts𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗕𝗘𝗧 لاین بت
@linebet_tel · 16,4297 postsGoalBall
@GoalBallTv · 10,4356 posts- 𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐃𝐚𝐫𝐤 🖤
@FootballDark · 32,0214 postsFuck Bet
@FutballFuckbet · 50,6114 postsHUNTER BET
@HUNTTER_BET · 6,9704 postsوین وین بت | Winwinbet
@Winwin_farsi · 129,5574 postsGoal News
@GoalnewsTv · 13,0782 postsمل بت
@melbet_chaneel · 36,0182 posts⚽️ 𝐍𝐚𝐛 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐫 | ناب ساکر
@Nabsoccer · 37,6062 postsRitzoBet Iran 🇮🇷
@Ritzobet_ir · 39,5992 postsBet Vision
@Vision_Bet · 15,0762 posts⚽️ Close Football
@CloseFootball · 3,0111 postDark News ⚽️
@darknews · 85,3261 postDobordcom
@dobordcom · 2,7651 postاسپورتینو | SPORTINO
@SPORTinoTV · 55,8011 postYEKBET _ یکبت
@yekbet · 33,1331 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dirtyfootball · 20,362
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
@FotballBad_Tv · 134,058
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 September 2026
@FunFooti · 19,773
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 24 September 2026
@Pentagon_Farsi · 128,069
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 September 2026
@jafar_mafar · 25,376
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
@Jimi_Remix · 65,728
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 20 August 2026
@lashiya_football · 20,957
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 September 2026
@FootballDark · 32,021
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
@DarkFotBalli · 53,091
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@ikcoeco · 69,257
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
@badfootbaIl · 22,072
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚽️Jag Sport” (@Jag_Sport), 11,642 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jag_Sport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.