Channel
@JanJiyarlr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9,165subscribers
-244 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001310981941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JanJiyarlr |
| Description | در این "عمری" که میدانی فقط چندى تو "مهمانی" به جان و دل تو "عاشق باش" رفیقان را "مراقب باش" مراقب باش که در "آنی" دل مورى "نرنجانی" که در آخر تو "میمانی" و مــُــشتی خاک که از "آنی" نظرات وپیشنهادات @JanJiyarlr |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JanJiyarlr |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:17 | 9,165 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:59 | 9,174 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:49 | 9,178 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:10 | 9,186 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 9,189 | -12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 9,201 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 9,202 | -11 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:50 | 9,213 | -7 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 9,220 | -29 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 9,249 | -17 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 9,266 | -28 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 9,294 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 9,304 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 9,308 | -24 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 9,332 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 9,342 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 9,352 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 9,364 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 9,368 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 9,372 | first reading |
122 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 122 (1 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 9,454 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 04:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 34 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 53.1% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 14.1% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 9.38% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 122 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
؛🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮 کسی رو دوست داری و میخوای ببینی حسش بهت چیه؟ https://t.me/+rXC3ZFk7SA0yNzA0 https://t.me/+rXC3ZFk7SA0yNzA0 https://t.me/+rXC3ZFk7SA0yNzA0 میخوای بدونی دوستت داره؟ بهت فکر میکنه؟آیا ازدواج دارید با این شخص؟آیا مانع هست سر راهتون؟؟ 💌فال کراش این سوالها و برسی میکنه،رزو فال با ایدی زیر 👇👇👇 @sameterap
هر قدر بیشتر مجبور باشید برای چیزی انتظار بکشید، وقتی در انتها به آن می رسید، بیشتر قدرش را خواهید دانست... هر قدر بیشتر مجبور باشید برای چیزی بجنگید، وقتی بدستش می آورید، برایتان قیمتیتر خواهد بود... و هر قدر بیشتر مجبور باشید در زندگیتان مقابل رنج بردباری کنید، مقصدتان شیرین تر خواهد بود... همه چیزهای خوب، ارزش صبر و مبارزه را دارند...
❤1
کلاغها خیلی دوست دارند عقابها را اذیت کنند! کلاغ با اینکه از عقاب کوچکتر است، اما چون چابکتر است، میتواند سریع بچرخد و مانور دهد. گاهی اوقات هنگام پرواز، بالای سرعقاب قرار میگیرد و به سمت آن شیرجه میرود، ولی عقاب میداند که میتواند اوج بگیرد. عقاب به جای اینکه از آزارهای کلاغ مزاحم ناراحت شود، بیشتر و بیشتر اوج میگیرد و سرانجام کلاغ عقب میافتد... وقتی کسی از روی حسادت و غرض ورزی اذیت تان میکند، رو به با…
🌟🌟جفت روحی چیست ؟ جفت روحی تو چه کسی است ؟ https://t.me/+1PYRyMGtmlcxYTRk https://t.me/+1PYRyMGtmlcxYTRk سرکتاب قرآنی 💎 گشایش همه امور و کارها 👆👆👆100%دقیق و بینظیررر
شبها سوار بر بال رویاها قرار ما باز هم بهشت آغوشت .. #سودا_ش
و در حوالیِ هوایِ تو نفس کشیدن معنایِ کاملِ زندگی ست. #فرزانه_طالبی_پور
شبها غرق تمناست دل_من ڪاش ڪہ مےشد بردارے اندڪے از غمهاےمن••• #سامیہ_حسینے
آنگاه که صدای تو را میشنوم میپندارم که میتوانم دیگر بار از تو شعلهور شوم... #غاده_السمان
فرقی نمی کند تو در کجای جهان باشی و من در کجا به دوست داشتنت مشغول باشم من به همين چند واژه ای که لا به لای شعر هایم به تو نسبت میدهم قانعم! به همین چند خطی که در آغوشم جای گرفته اى... 🤍 #رضا_کریم_پور
گاهی دلتنگی آنقدر عمیق میشود که حتی واژهها هم از گفتنش جا میمانند من تو را نه فقط در لحظههای نبودنت، که در تمام ثانیههای زندگیام احساس میکنم، میان سکوتهایم، پشت لبخندهایم و لابهلای تمام فکرهایی که بیاختیار به تو ختم میشوند. کاش میدانستی چقدر دلم هوای بودنت را کرده،نه برای گفتن چیزی، فقط برای اینکه کنارم باشی و دنیا برای چند لحظه، همان جای قشنگ همیشگیاش شود... کنار تو. ❤️ #امیر_عباس_خالق_وردی
👏2
تفــسیر عشق این است من بے تـــــو بے پناهم #هما_ڪشتگر
بڪـرترین حیـاطخلـوت دنیـا را تــو دارے در آغـوش مـردانہات #ستایش_قاسمے
Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @JanJiyarlr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 16 posts on @JanJiyarlr as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@JanJiyarlr named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤سکوت عشق❤” (@JanJiyarlr), 9,165 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JanJiyarlr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.