سخنگوی سپاه: امروزه هوافضا تسلیحات ساخت خود را صادر میکند؛ مانند موشک ۳۵۸، آرمان(بالستیک با نام دیگر ابابیل) و سامانه پدافندی سوم خرداد @Jangjuuyan

Channel
جنگجویان صلح
@Jangjuuyan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,785subscribers
+8,777 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004396908400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Jangjuuyan |
| Description | بزرگترین طرفداران صلح،جنگجویان هستند |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Jangjuuyan |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:09 | 8,785 | +145 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:18 | 8,640 | +445 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:48 | 8,195 | -497 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:22 | 8,692 | +335 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:37 | 8,357 | -411 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:39 | 8,768 | +46 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:46 | 8,722 | -102 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 8,824 | +1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 06:28 | 8,823 | +816 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 8,007 | +96 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 7,911 | +7,720 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 191 | +177 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:54 | 14 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
159 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.439%
- avg views ÷ 8,785 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 38.6
- 143 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.78%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 143
- of 159 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 143 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 159 (31 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 5,520 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,100
- Videos
- ≈239
- Links
- ≈167
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8m 54s
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 34 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 59.6% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 21.3% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 159 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 159 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 159 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Jangjuuyan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 159 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 18 of 143 posts held from the last 30 days (12.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://t.me/Parvazdaroj/32610 صحبت های اساتید درباره اس۴۰۰ و سرنوشتتش در ایران حرف اضافهای برای گفتن نیست مگر اینکه تمام سامانه های پدافندی در هر برد و ابعادی در جغرافیای ایران نیازمند نیروی هوایی قوی در آسمان است.
دونالد ترامپ در مصاحبه با برنامه ۶۰ دقیقه»اعلام کرد احتمالا پس از انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا، تعدادی دیگر از وزرای کابینه خود را برکنار خواهد کرد. ترامپ با این حال، نام هیچیک از مقامهای ارشدی را که احتمال برکناری آنها وجود دارد، اعلام نکرد. @Jangjuuyan
👍1
سه جریان متفاوت در واشنگتن برای تعیین مسیر بعدی جنگ با ایران در رقابت هستند. بر اساس گزارش والاستریت ژورنال، در دولت دونالد ترامپ سه رویکرد اصلی درباره چگونگی ادامه جنگ با ایران شکل گرفته است: جریان نخست؛ دیپلماسی و توافق: جیدی ونس، معاون رئیسجمهور، استیو ویتکاف، نماینده ویژه ترامپ، و شماری از رهبران کشورهای عربی حوزه خلیج فارس از مسیر مذاکره حمایت میکنند. به گفته مقامهای منطقهای، نشانههایی وجود دارد که هر …
https://t.me/Parvazdaroj/32606 اصولا دوران پدافند بدون تحرک مانند S-300/400 تمام شده است اگر هم بخواهند ادامه دهند باید زیر چتر ده ها سامانه برد کوتاه و متوسط و نیروی هوایی قوی قرار بگیرند، نه اینکه به تنهایی اقدام کنند. در نیاز ایران بوک و S-350 در پدافند میانبرد بهترین( و شاید تنها) گزینه ها باشند. @Jangjuuyan|Colonel
زلنسکی: از افرادی که بهتازگی وارد کنگره خواهند شد و همچنین از حزب دموکرات شنیدهام که در کنار ما ایستادهاند. آنها تلاش نمیکنند میان ما و روسیه موضعی بیطرفانه بگیرند. از اینکه بگویند روسیه متجاوز است، هراسی ندارند. آنها نمیخواهند سرزمین ما را به پوتین واگذار کنند. به همین دلیل، فکر میکنم که میتوانیم روی حمایت بیشتر آنها حساب کنیم. @Jangjuuyan
🤯1
حرکت گروه آبیـخاکی آمریکا از ژاپن به سمت خاورمیانه گروه آماده آبیـخاکی ناوگان آمریکا موسوم به Makin Island ARG، پایگاه دریایی یوکوسوکا در ژاپن را ترک کرد تا به مسیر خود بهسوی منطقه عملیاتی سنتکام در خاورمیانه ادامه دهد. این گروه شامل سه شناور است: ناو تهاجمی آبیـخاکی USS Makin Island از کلاس وسپ ناو ترابری آبیـخاکی USS Anchorage از کلاس سن آنتونیو ناو ترابری آبیـخاکی USS John P. Murtha این گروه علاوه…
تمامی عکس ها متعلق به حضور ارتشیان ایرانی در عمان نیستند. بطور کلی عکس های کمی از حضور ایران در عمان وجود دارد و بیشتر عکس ها متعلق به نیرو های بریتانیایی،عمانی و شورشیان است. @Jangjuuyan|Colonel
جنگ ظفار و ایران؛دور از خانه بخش هشتم سلطان قابوس در دسامبر ۱۹۷۵ پایان عملیات عمده نظامی در ظفار را اعلام کرد و جنگ در مرحله اصلی خود به پایان رسید. با این حال، فعالیتهای محدود چریکی تا سالهای بعد نیز ادامه داشت. حضور نظامی ایران در عمان بلافاصله خاتمه پیدا نکرد و بخشی از نیروهای ایرانی تا زمان وقوع انقلاب اسلامی در سال ۱۳۵۷ و سقوط حکومت پهلوی در عمان باقی ماندند. پس از وقوع انقلاب در فوریه ۱۹۷۹، نیروهای باقیماند…
جنگ ظفار و ایران؛دور از خانه بخش هفتم در اواخر سال ۱۹۷۵، نیروهای ایرانی و عمانی در چارچوب عملیات هدف (Operation Hadaf) حمله گستردهای را علیه مواضع باقیمانده شورشیان در غرب ظفار آغاز کردند. این عملیات با مشارکت دو تیپ، شامل نیروهای عمانی و گروه رزمی ایرانی، انجام شد و از پشتیبانی هوایی و آتش دریایی ناوچههای ایرانی برخوردار بود. در جریان عملیات، نیروهای ائتلاف موفق شدند پایگاه مهم شورشیان در غارهای شریشیتی را تصرف …
جنگ ظفار و ایران؛دور از خانه بخش ششم یکی از مهمترین مناطق عملیاتی ارتش ایران در جنگ ظفار، منطقه ساحلی رخیوت در غرب استان ظفار بود. نیروهای ایرانی در جریان عملیات نادر در دسامبر ۱۹۷۴ برای تصرف این منطقه وارد عمل شدند؛ هرچند پیشروی اولیه با مقاومت شورشیان و مشکلات تاکتیکی همراه شد. سرانجام در ژانویه ۱۹۷۵، نیروهای ایرانی موفق به تصرف رخیوت شدند. اهمیت این منطقه در موقعیت جغرافیایی آن و نقش آن در محدود کردن تحرکات و …
جنگ ظفار و ایران؛دور از خانه بخش پنجم با گسترش حضور نیروهای ایرانی، مأموریت آنها نیز از پشتیبانی و تأمین امنیت مسیرها به عملیات تهاجمی تغییر پیدا کرد. در دسامبر ۱۹۷۴، نیروهای ایرانی عملیات گستردهتری را در غرب ظفار آغاز کردند. یکی از مهمترین اهداف این عملیات، تصرف مناطق ساحلی و محدود کردن ارتباط شورشیان با یمن جنوبی بود. در جریان عملیات نادر (Operation Nader)، نیروهای ایرانی برای پیشروی به سمت منطقه رخیوت وارد در…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 159 posts we hold for @Jangjuuyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@jangaavaran1390 · 137,09219 postsTask Force Artemis⚓️
@Artemis_Force · 11,6325 postsکاتافراکت
@cataphract1 · 59,7674 postsIranian Naval Force
@Navy_Iranian · 20,8072 postsRASTAKHIZ
@RASTAKHIZ_PERSIAN · 16,8322 postsRed Lion Corps
@RedLionCorps · 25,2102 postsPatriot meme
@MGC1400 · 15,7371 postتوئیت نظامی
@Military_Tweet · 18,2041 postMinas Tirith
@Minas_Tirith2024 · 43,1311 post🇮🇷وقایع الاتفاقیه نظامی🇮🇷
@defence_news · 49,3851 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Artemis_Force · 11,6325 postsکاتافراکت
@cataphract1 · 59,7675 postsجنگاوران
@jangaavaran1390 · 137,0925 posts🇮🇷وقایع الاتفاقیه نظامی🇮🇷
@defence_news · 49,3852 postsIranian Naval Force
@Navy_Iranian · 20,8072 postsParvaz dar oj
@Parvazdaroj · 32,1282 postsRASTAKHIZ
@RASTAKHIZ_PERSIAN · 16,8322 postsRed Lion Corps
@RedLionCorps · 25,2102 postsPatriot meme
@MGC1400 · 15,7371 postتوئیت نظامی
@Military_Tweet · 18,2041 postMinas Tirith
@Minas_Tirith2024 · 43,1311 postPatriot Meme
@Patriot_meme · 2541 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جنگجویان صلح” (@Jangjuuyan), 8,785 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jangjuuyan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.