Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for جاوید نامان ایران

Channel

جاوید نامان ایران

@JavidnamanIran

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,873subscribers

-278 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002116371134
TypeChannel
Username@JavidnamanIran
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/JavidnamanIran

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,8738,1518,0127 August 2026 — 8,151 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,140 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,123 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,084 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,064 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,041 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,035 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,991 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,944 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,926 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,904 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,886 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,873 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -278. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,831–8,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:167,873-13
13 Sept 2026, 05:157,886-18
9 Sept 2026, 15:217,904-22
4 Sept 2026, 12:397,926-18
1 Sept 2026, 09:377,944-47
29 Aug 2026, 03:547,991-44
25 Aug 2026, 17:238,035-6
22 Aug 2026, 14:028,041-23
18 Aug 2026, 21:058,064-20
15 Aug 2026, 14:378,084-39
11 Aug 2026, 22:118,123-17
8 Aug 2026, 11:578,140-11
7 Aug 2026, 12:018,151first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.35%
avg views ÷ 7,873 subscribers
Avg views / post
736
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held87 (28 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total16,190
Reactions total855
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44m 31s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,003 reactions across 85 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,12228.0%
💔73518.4%
❤‍🔥70317.6%
👍49312.3%
👏2365.90%
🕊1593.97%
🔥982.45%
🙏872.17%
🫡812.02%
👌802.00%
😢561.40%
🤩531.32%
💯521.30%
😭400.999%
🥰70.175%
😇10.025%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,003 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC210 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

دهانه شگفت‌انگیز آتشفشان دماوند! 🔹اینجا بالاترین نقطه ایران است؛ جایی که بعد از ساعت‌ها صعود، روبه‌روی دهانه عظیم آتشفشان دماوند می‌ایستید. بوی گوگرد، بخارهای خارج‌شده از زمین و منظره‌ای که بیشتر شبیه یک سیاره دیگر است تا یک کوه!

5❤‍🔥3🙏1

Signed Bamdad

28 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC390 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

بحث کردن با عرزشی‌ها این شکلیه

👌15👍32

Signed Bamdad

28 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC385 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💯105👍2

Signed Bamdad

28 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC373 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥6

Signed Bamdad

28 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC530 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

کامنت و دیس برتر

👏36👌82🔥2🥰1

Signed Bamdad

28 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC508 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

پادشاه سوئد کارل گوستاف: «اندوه فراوان» شاه کارل شانزدهم گوستاف پس از درگذشت شاه هارالد اظهاراتی را بیان کرد. «خانواده‌ام و من با اندوه فراوان خبر درگذشت دوست عزیزیمان، شاه هارالد را دریافت کردیم.» او می‌نویسد که سرگذشت شاه هارالد «استثنایی» است و او توانست پس از جنگ «به نروژ آزاد بازگردد و شاهد توسعه و پیشرفت شگفت‌انگیز کشور در قرن بیستم باشد و پس از آن، جانشین پدرش به عنوان پادشاه نروژ شود.» پادشاه ادامه می‌دهد:

👍81👏1

Signed Bamdad

28 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC478 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

ایشان هم پادشاه جدید نروژ هستندبا شعار همه چیز برای نروژ!

👍14

Signed Bamdad

28 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC526 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

هارالد پنجم پادشاه نروژ در ۸۹ سالگی درگذشت او ورزشکار حرفه‌ای محسوب می‌شد و در سه دوره المپیک ۱۹۶۴ توکیو، ۱۹۶۸ مکزیکوسیتی و ۱۹۷۲ مونیخ برای نروژ در رشته قایقرانی بادبانی مسابقه داد. هارالد پنجم در کودکی از دست نازی‌ها فرار کرد. وقتی آلمان نازی در سال ۱۹۴۰ نروژ را اشغال کرد، هارالد فقط سه سال داشت. مادرش او و خواهرانش را ابتدا به سوئد و سپس با کشتی به آمریکا برد؛ پدر و پدربزرگش نیز به بریتانیا رفتند. او اولین شاهزا

👍71

Signed Bamdad

28 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC510 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yx-jFqv9pYM

❤‍🔥93🙏2

Signed Bamdad

27 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC872 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

بیناموسهای مزدور جاعش.......همیشه معتقد بودم این احزاب دوزاری و اختلافات قومیتی روی دیگه سکه جمهوری اسلامی هستند.

👍52💯1

Signed Bamdad

27 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC906 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

میبینم که عرازشه خارش دارند. قبلا هم بهتون هشدار داده بودم کرم ریزیتان زیر پستهای این کانال با تمسخر و هجو مقدساتتان پاسخ داده خواهد شد. نوش جان کنید بیعقلهای دوزاری!

🤩30👍6🔥6👌4💯1

Signed Bamdad

27 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC949 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

سخنان شادروان استاد رضا فاضلی در مورد شیوه های رژیم برای فرستادن نفوذی‌هایش بخارج

💯278👍8👏2👌1

Signed Bamdad

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @JavidnamanIran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CPI VPN
@irancpi_vpn · 30,618
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 7 September 2026
Baraye Azadi | برای آزادی
@Baraye_azadi_Info · 45,294
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 September 2026
MahsaAlert
@mahsa_alert · 33,073
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 4 September 2026
NasNet | استارلینک برای ایران
@joinNASNET · 30,450
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 7 September 2026
Mahsa Net
@mahsa_net · 133,659
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
ShadowProxy66
@ShadowProxy66 · 87,934
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 17 August 2026
BatisVPN
@BatisVPNChannel · 32,952
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 4 September 2026
فیلترشکن نیم بها | Abc Cloud
@Abc_Cloud · 112,894
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 27 August 2026
Wireguard Configᵛᵖⁿ
@ConfigWireguard · 22,872
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 September 2026
ساخت آهنگ های هوش مصنوعی بلوچی افغانی فارسی پشتو
@Ferdesmozek · 23,313
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026
IRCF | اینترنت آزاد برای همه
@ircfspace · 96,110
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 August 2026
مولانا شمس
@mevlana_shams · 21,592
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“جاوید نامان ایران” (@JavidnamanIran), 7,873 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JavidnamanIran.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.