Do you want me to start doing livetrade with you guys?
- Yes63%
- urm, neh0%
- SURE!38%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@JiFXInternational
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
3,039subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002063633119 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @dollargangs @JiFXInternational |
| Description | OFFICIAL π²πΎ Trading β’ Live Sessions β’ Market Insights Building traders. Building a community. New Face. New Era. New Chapter. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JiFXInternational |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 3,039 | no change |
| 28 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 3,039 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 3,039 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 3,042 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 3,037 | +5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 3,032 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 3,030 | +15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 3,015 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 3,032 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 3,052 | +13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 3,039 | +12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 3,027 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 3,023 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 12 February 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (12 February 2025 β 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,594 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 28 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
242 reactions across 30 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 96 | 39.7% | |
| π₯ | 63 | 26.0% | |
| π | 19 | 7.85% | |
| π | 18 | 7.44% | |
| π | 15 | 6.20% | |
| π | 12 | 4.96% | |
| π | 5 | 2.07% | |
| π― | 5 | 2.07% | |
| π | 4 | 1.65% | |
| β‘ | 3 | 1.24% | |
| π³ | 2 | 0.826% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 242 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2025 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Do you want me to start doing livetrade with you guys?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Training season is over everyone. Itβs time to make money with me. @JiXOfficial23 β
β€3π―3π₯1
β HAPPY WEEKENDS JI FX ! If trading has been hard for you, DONβT GIVE UP. Forget what happened before. Forget the losses, the mistakes, and the bad days. Youβre still here , and you can still improve. Let JI FX be your NEW BEGINNING. π₯ Learn again. Build your confidence again. Start again. One good decision at a time. One setup at a time. One day at a time. YOUR TRADING STORY IS NOT OVER YET. We go again next β¦
β€3π₯2
β JI X DAILY PERFORMANCE BUY +50 PIPS β BUY +90 PIPS β SELL +120 PIPS β SELL +90 PIPS β BUY +200 PIPS β BUY +150 PIPS β SELL - HIT RISK BUY +150 PIPS β BUY +120 PIPS β SELL +80 PIPS β BUY +70 PIPS β π TOTAL: +1,120 PIPS π 11 ENTRIES β 10 WINS β 1 HIT RISK ANOTHER +1,000 PIPS DAY! π₯ #FOLLOWRAPATJI @JiXOfficial23 β
β€2β‘1π₯1
This is how i trade with my personal technique with 99% winrate! X Break! β To learn is free from me , watch and learn everyone.
β THIS IS JI X SPEAKING We already whack 11 entries today. Should be enough guys! Cukup lah tu. ENJOY YOUR PROFITS. Trust me , this is the only channel you need after this. #FOLLOWRAPATJI β
β€3π₯1
β OFFICIAL! Do not overtrade! Itβs friday , withdraw and enjoy our profits! β€οΈ #FOLLOWRAPATJI β
π₯1
How is everyone ? All good with the set ups? β€οΈ
π₯1
ππ€£π₯²βΊοΈππ BOOOOOOOM ! π₯ 70 PIPS IN THE BAG! β€οΈ Feel free to collect your profits! FOLLOW RAPAT JI ! β
π₯1
HEHEHEHEHE
π₯2
This is X Break Set Up! LETS GO π₯
π₯2
β GOLD BUY NOW @ 4306 - 4296 SL: 4295 TP: 50 / 100 PIPS REGISTER YOUR BROKER HERE β€οΈ
π₯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @JiFXInternational. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you want me to start doing livetrade with you guys?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2025 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βJI FX π²πΎβ (@JiFXInternational), 3,039 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JiFXInternational.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.