This has the burners to run. Such a classic OG meme and ties with UNC trend

Channel
Jiriya’s Crypto Hub
@JiriyaCalls
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
544subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001527521713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JiriyaCalls |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JiriyaCalls |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 544 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 549 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 550 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 553 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 557 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 564 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 564 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://dexscreener.com/solana/vidaU7tLU2Kan2w2jGhz5dqgqBmtKkmVRJ7Pcu2bEqF https://x.com/ogprimaere/status/2044938992362434939
Jiriya’s Crypto Hub pinned «https://dexscreener.com/solana/g6y5t2tl7aabzpybp5s5mzxadv1rhp6lx661mbysitaz»
https://dexscreener.com/solana/g6y5t2tl7aabzpybp5s5mzxadv1rhp6lx661mbysitaz
https://x.com/i/communities/2039432671105864182 blind ape here at 60k or wait for dips
Doge mother posted a "meme" of a dog and called it $Cerberus. launched on anon $doge launchpad like $kimchi @anoncoinit BbKYgz7xdatSX2NKuu6pCoWQWZNqNCPepHydQuk3doge
https://x.com/romeonchain/status/2031678651863859466?s=46
Photo, posted without a caption
https://dexscreener.com/solana/NbVgvj5fwR4N5HrrTgjcdFefkDdg2jRSTojsjdQuju2 300k they getting the guy who sold the pizza for 10k btc onboard could be really good ply
https://www.tiktok.com/@patapooumm 1 post 8m views new doge
D7ULxL9YCACguQ5qyAojJwjZdvnAj2dnd4v5ehocdoge 4k MC information coming
hit 200k overnight and 2 days left till the new year
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JiriyaCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@JiriyaCalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 28 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jiriya’s Crypto Hub” (@JiriyaCalls), 544 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JiriyaCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.