Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for " کانال فکاهی 😉😂"

Channel

" کانال فکاهی 😉😂"

@Jo_Kes

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,410subscribers

-238 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001293648388
TypeChannel
Username@Jo_Kes
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Jo_Kes

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,4107,6487,5297 August 2026 — 7,648 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,639 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,623 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,592 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,574 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,561 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,541 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,518 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,500 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,477 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,447 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,432 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,410 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,374–7,684 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 20:567,410-22
12 Sept 2026, 02:207,432-15
7 Sept 2026, 19:017,447-30
3 Sept 2026, 02:177,477-23
30 Aug 2026, 16:437,500-18
27 Aug 2026, 16:257,518-23
24 Aug 2026, 18:447,541-20
20 Aug 2026, 17:177,561-13
17 Aug 2026, 17:387,574-18
14 Aug 2026, 13:347,592-31
11 Aug 2026, 04:367,623-16
7 Aug 2026, 23:057,639-9
7 Aug 2026, 10:177,648first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.24%
avg views ÷ 7,410 subscribers
Avg views / post
166
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held92 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total6,133
Reactions total135
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

353 reactions across 92 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6719.0%
🥰3710.5%
😍308.50%
😘277.65%
❤‍🔥246.80%
🤩205.67%
🌚195.38%
🕊174.82%
🍓133.68%
💋123.40%
💯123.40%
🔥113.12%
👍102.83%
👏92.55%
😁92.55%
🤣92.55%
🎉61.70%
🙏61.70%
💔51.42%
🤗41.13%
3 further kinds61.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC95 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fahraq_yar

یار شدم، یار شدم، با غمِ تو یار شدم تا که رسیدم برِ تو، از همه بیزار شدم -مولوی و من هم نیز با غمِ تو یار شدم ... 𝒜𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃 • • فراق‌یار ؛)☘ • @Fahraq_Yar • 🤖• ربــات فــونت و زیبا نویس " 🤖•ربات ،رباتساز با سرعت عالی "

🌚2🕊2😁1

27 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC154 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fahraq_yar

نامه‌ای پنجم ... " پیش از تو نمی‌دانستم قلب ِ آدم می‌تواند یک نفر را این همه عمیق در خودش جا بدهد. نمی‌دانستم که میشود کسی آنقدر در جانت بنشیند که نبودنش هم شکل ِ خاصی از حضور باشد . حالا اگر تمام ِ جهان را از من بگیرند، هنوز وقتی که بتو فکر میکنم چیزی در من باقی است که هیچ دستی به آن نمی‌رسد .. دوست داشتنت تنها چیزی‌است که جهان نتوانسته است از من پس بگیرد . " 𝒜𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃 • • فراق‌یار ؛)☘ • @Fahraq_Yar • 🤖• ربــات فــونت

😍31❤‍🔥1🥰1

26 Aug 2026, 02:59 UTC236 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fahraq_yar

در قیامت ، عابدی را دوزخش انداختند هر چه فریادش، جوابش را نمی پرداختند داد میزد خوانده ام هفتاد سال، هرشب نماز پس چه شد اینک ثواب ِآن همه رازونیاز یک ندا آمد چرا تهمت زدی همسایه ات تا شود اینگونه حالت، این جهنم خانه ات گفت من در طول عمرم گر زدم یک تهمتی. ظلم باشد زان بسوزم، ای خدا کن رحمتی آن ندا گفتا همانکس که زدی تهمت براو طفلکی هفتاد سال، جمع کرده بودش آبرو 𝒜𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃 • • فراق‌یار ؛)☘ • @Fahraq_Yar • 🤖• ربــات ف

😍2😘2💋1

25 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC164 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @FunCrop

ختم قرآن داریم کسی اشتراک میکنه پیوی @PV_POKHTON

1🌚1👍1😘1

25 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC170 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @FunCrop

شوهر : داخل بولانی کچالو چرا کچالو دیده نمیشه خانم : چپ کن داخل پلو ازبکی کی ازبک دیده

🌭1😁1😘1🙏1

25 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC200 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @FunCrop

‏مادر مه به مه گفت قوی باش، یک مقطعی از زندگی هست که مجبوری سختی بکشی. گفتم کدوم مقطع ؟ گفت از تولد تا مرگت👻 ● 👉 @FunCrop / جوک سنتر 😂 🤖• ربــات فــونت و زیبا نویس "@Bio_font1_bot

🤩1😘1

25 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC169 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @FunCrop

اگر نت خراب شود، 😐* *ما که مردم عادی بودیم، به زندگی‌مان برمی‌گردیم!* *اما وای به حال خان‌ها، ملکه‌ها، شهزاده‌ها و پرنسس‌های مجازی...* *حکومت‌شان چقدر مفتضحانه به پایان می‌رسد! 😜🫣😂* *خان‌های مجازی، بی‌قبیله خواهد شد* ، *پرنده‌های مجازی، بی‌آسمان😂😂* 𝒜𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃 • ● 👉 @FunCrop / جوک سنتر 😂 🤖•ربات ،رباتساز با سرعت عالی "

1❤‍🔥1🍓1👍1🔥1😍1

25 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC158 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @FunCrop

. و چقدر دختر ها و بچه های وطنی ما که د مجازی عروسی کدن طلاق انلاینی بخورن🥲😂 #اݪۺیــخ 🥴💔📿

😘3👏1💋1🕊1😭1

25 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC156 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @zehnedange

میلاد با سعادت حضرت نبی کریم(ص) مبارک❣🤲

6🌚3💯1

25 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC179 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @FunCrop

#بحث_شب 💫 بدترین ابرو ریزی یا سوتی که داشتید کجا و چی بود؟ 𝒜𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃 • ● 👉 @FunCrop / جوک سنتر 😂 🤖•ربات ،رباتساز با سرعت عالی "

🥰4❤‍🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC190 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fahraq_yar

‌‏میشود یکبارشعرم رابخوانی...یاکه نه؟ لااقل اندازه ی شعرم بمانی…یاکه نه!؟ هیچ میدانی غزال بیشه ی شعرم تویی لُعبتِ لب غنچه ی ابرو کمانی…یاکه نه!؟ آی موخرماییِ دل نازک ِلب صورتی بازهم داری همان شیرین زبانی…یا که نه!؟ با توهستم! تک درختِ سرو بی همتا؛هنوز فنچ از دور سر خود می پرانی یا که نه!؟ راه می رفتی تمام شهر محوت می شدند وقت رفتن باز لیمو می تکانی …یا که نه!؟ من همان قالیچه ی پاخورده ام یادت که هست - _رد شدی از

🍓3🤣1

25 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC210 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @FunCropPhoto

دوران نامزدی VS بعد ازدواج 😂💔 𝒜𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃 • ● 👉 @FunCrop / جوک سنتر 😂 🤖•ربات ،رباتساز با سرعت عالی "

😁2💋1🤣1🤩1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @Jo_Kes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTCFinal Results9 voters

ناشناس بریم؟ مطالب ارسالی، انتقاد، پیشنهاد و چت!

  1. یس 📥67%
  2. نه 🎀😐33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بهترین کانال فکاهی
@BehtarinKanalFakahi · 31,846
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 5 September 2026
کانال‌ شعر مولانا حافظ سعدی ابتهاج
@sd_bl · 27,737
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“" کانال فکاهی 😉😂"” (@Jo_Kes), 7,410 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jo_Kes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.