Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 53 days, net -1,722. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,334–60,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Sept 2026, 16:02
58,592
-277
17 Sept 2026, 21:18
58,869
-79
15 Sept 2026, 14:38
58,948
-53
14 Sept 2026, 01:39
59,001
-64
12 Sept 2026, 09:56
59,065
-84
10 Sept 2026, 07:21
59,149
-106
6 Sept 2026, 22:38
59,255
-99
4 Sept 2026, 07:20
59,354
-52
2 Sept 2026, 22:54
59,406
-55
1 Sept 2026, 18:12
59,461
-33
31 Aug 2026, 15:42
59,494
-29
30 Aug 2026, 16:56
59,523
-59
29 Aug 2026, 13:57
59,582
-34
28 Aug 2026, 13:01
59,616
-40
27 Aug 2026, 10:28
59,656
-26
26 Aug 2026, 10:03
59,682
-39
25 Aug 2026, 07:53
59,721
-23
24 Aug 2026, 09:53
59,744
-77
22 Aug 2026, 19:56
59,821
-54
21 Aug 2026, 08:57
59,875
first reading
Engagement
130 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.65%
avg views ÷ 58,592 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,900
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.424%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 130 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026
Posts held
130 (29 July 2026 – 4 October 2026)
Views total
210,467
Reactions total
893
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Oct 2026, 19:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,670
Videos
≈25
Links
≈546
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,150 reactions across 121 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,586
73.8%
🤣
158
7.35%
🤡
119
5.53%
😁
110
5.12%
💔
78
3.63%
👍
28
1.30%
🔥
12
0.558%
🤔
10
0.465%
👏
8
0.372%
😭
8
0.372%
🥰
7
0.326%
💩
6
0.279%
🤮
6
0.279%
👎
3
0.14%
😱
3
0.14%
🤓
3
0.14%
🙊
2
0.093%
🥱
2
0.093%
🤯
1
0.047%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 130 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
My boyfriend has been asking me to give him head, so I asked him if he would also go down on me. He said it’s not good to go down on a woman.
Then I told him that if going down on women isn’t good, then giving him head isn’t good either. Since then, we only have sex without any foreplay or romantic stuff. He doesn’t even know how to kiss to make me wet. He just puts lube on his dick and goes straight to penetration.…
I'm a 29-year-old man dating an 18-year-old lady. We've been together for about 2–3 months, and I'm seriously contemplating ending the relationship.
My biggest concern is communication. I'm usually the one initiating calls and messages. Sometimes I call several times before she answers, she rarely returns missed calls, and my messages often go unanswered.
Initially, she explained that she was busy with work and tra…
I want to start by acknowledging that this is 100% a me problem and there is absolutely nothing wrong with my wife.
We’ve been married for 2 years, together for 4. She gave birth to my 10-year-old step daughter before we met, and I’m not sure if what I’m seeing is just my wife’s natural physiology or if it’s secondary to giving birth.
Basically, her labia majora (outer lips) are very saggy/deflated appearing. They’…
Really just need some advice as I don’t know who to talk to about this. In the recent months I’ve been noticing flirtatious behavior between my wife and my friend. Nothing too out of the normal for them, we are all usually pretty “lovey” with each-other and hug and whatnot. Platonically of course but nonetheless. But this has been different. Them sneaking away to different rooms when we’d all hang out together, me wa…
Keep me anonymous
There’s this lady who wanted a relationship with me when I was growing up. Although she didn’t make it clear to me during the time that it was a relationship but because I saw her as welcoming and a good person, we decided to be together as friends but we had sex sometimes.
Fast forward I realized that , what we have been doing looks like a relationship which could lead to marriage , but the quest…
I (36F) have worked with my boss (39M) for several years now in a very small office. It’s basically just the two of us most of the time, aside from one contracted employee who comes in occasionally. We’re both single.
Over the years we’ve gotten extremely close. We talk about pretty much everything and share a lot of personal/intimate details about our lives with each other. We also have mutual friends outside of wo…
I’m a coach 22M and this woman 34F and I have been texting and since I’ve told everyone I’m moving , she’s been on my dick and we’ve been sexting but it’s eating at me because she’s married , she’s deadass telling me she can’t get me out of her head and she wants me inside of her so bad.
Look I’m 22 and it’s hot but my morals would be totally out of whack if I commit such an act. Sex feels good but her being married…
me and my boyfriend broke up and had no contact for about a month. during that time, he went out twice with another girl. since we were broken up, i understand that he was technically free to do that.
after a month, he came back to me promising he would put in more effort and make things work this time. he also told me himself about the girl and said he would cut her off now that we were back together.
everything was…
I don't know exactly what all of it means, and I'm probably filling in some blanks myself. When I talk to her about it, she says she never had another serious relationship apart from her ex. She says there were other guys she could meet, talk to, go to the movies with, and even kiss, but nothing more happened with them.
The difficult part is that I actually believe she loves me. She is very family-oriented and has b…
I don't like writing long posts, and this one is created after year of attemts to write one. So I'll try to keep this as short and clear as possible.
I'm 36M, have been married for 11 years, and we have two kids, 9 and 4.
My wife and I dated for about 3 years before getting married. We met when we were around 19, but didn't start dating until we were 21, after a series of random encounters in the city where we live. …
Do you think there's a difference in having a partner who hasn't gone to tertiary and one who has gone to tertiary?
❤4
Signed KOFI GbƐ 🎳🎃
Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @Jodelandstoryhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JODEL STORIES 🎃” (@Jodelandstoryhub), 58,592 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Jodelandstoryhub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.