Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 88 days, net +191. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 30,822โ32,232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 20:08
31,245
-67
5 Nov 2026, 22:21
31,312
-47
5 Nov 2026, 00:10
31,359
-92
3 Nov 2026, 20:29
31,451
-20
2 Nov 2026, 22:10
31,471
+35
2 Nov 2026, 00:16
31,436
-34
31 Oct 2026, 23:35
31,470
-89
31 Oct 2026, 02:55
31,559
-21
30 Oct 2026, 04:26
31,580
+27
29 Oct 2026, 02:38
31,553
-12
28 Oct 2026, 01:07
31,565
-58
27 Oct 2026, 00:39
31,623
+41
26 Oct 2026, 00:37
31,582
-103
24 Oct 2026, 21:16
31,685
-47
23 Oct 2026, 22:18
31,732
+70
22 Oct 2026, 21:14
31,662
+135
21 Oct 2026, 17:39
31,527
-1
20 Oct 2026, 11:09
31,528
+11
19 Oct 2026, 10:19
31,517
-46
18 Oct 2026, 13:29
31,563
first reading
Engagement
1,580 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
9.31%
avg views รท 31,245 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,910
607 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.447%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
608
of 1,580 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 563 of 607 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
1,580 (8 August 2026 โ 6 November 2026)
Views total
1,765,301
Reactions total
7,674
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 49s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
15,275 reactions across 911 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
11,718
76.7%
๐
2,256
14.8%
๐
402
2.63%
๐
271
1.77%
๐ฅฐ
233
1.53%
โคโ๐ฅ
160
1.05%
๐ฏ
59
0.386%
โ
43
0.282%
๐ฆ
42
0.275%
๐
34
0.223%
๐ฅ
26
0.17%
๐
11
0.072%
๐
8
0.052%
๐
7
0.046%
๐
5
0.033%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 921 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 15,275 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 September 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 998 we hold a reading for ยท 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @KALYAN_BOS_LIVE123. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 September 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 13 of 608 posts held from the last 30 days (2.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
CONGRATULATIONS ๐๐ ALL VIP MEMBERS
KALYAN DAY OPEN PASS....22222
OPEN PENAL PASS.....390....390
FULL SANGM PASS....390-24-257
CONGRATULATIONS ๐๐
https://wa.me/919461751625?text=VIP_GAME_CHAHIYE
https://wa.me/919461751625?text=VIP_GAME_CHAHIYE
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,580 posts we hold for @KALYAN_BOS_LIVE123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@KALYAN_BOS_LIVE123 edited 3 posts after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 September 2026
Most recent edit
10 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 65 posts on @KALYAN_BOS_LIVE123 as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
27
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
เคเคฒเฅเคฏเคพเคฃ เคเฅเคทเฅเคฃเคพ เคเคพเคฐเฅเค โข @kalyanday ยท 31,387 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 44 here โ alongside 43 others โ read 7 September 2026
BAJRANG BALI MATKHA๐ @Kalyan_Satka_Matka_Fix_Panaa ยท 30,302 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 39 here โ alongside 38 others โ read 7 September 2026
๐ค{ ๐.๐ฃ - เคฌเฅเคธ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฌ )๐ค ๐๐ก๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐ง @SINALFIXLEAK ยท 19,783 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 41 here โ alongside 40 others โ read 1 October 2026
TRISHUL SATTA MATKAโข @SRIDEVI_MILAN_DAY ยท 24,811 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 40 here โ alongside 39 others โ read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐๐ฃ ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ ( ๐๐๐ ๐ )โ (@KALYAN_BOS_LIVE123), 31,245 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KALYAN_BOS_LIVE123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
