Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 71 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Oct 2026, 06:07
466
-107
11 Oct 2026, 02:57
573
-16
30 Sept 2026, 08:39
589
-1,673
15 Sept 2026, 19:00
2,262
-177
11 Sept 2026, 22:19
2,439
-760
7 Sept 2026, 19:38
3,199
-178
2 Sept 2026, 10:12
3,377
-14
30 Aug 2026, 08:37
3,391
-11
27 Aug 2026, 07:03
3,402
-344
24 Aug 2026, 16:54
3,746
+3,238
16 Aug 2026, 03:14
508
-7
8 Aug 2026, 04:04
515
no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:20
515
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
122 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
32
26.2%
💯
15
12.3%
custom 5382359642758220076
14
11.5%
⚡
13
10.7%
custom 5789490441833419701
11
9.02%
custom 5832319387557696692
9
7.38%
❤🔥
9
7.38%
custom 5429348418927494408
5
4.10%
👍
5
4.10%
custom 5381936060198581507
4
3.28%
💔
4
3.28%
custom 5834503107844775107
1
0.82%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
108
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
108
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KAwwKe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
اللهم في يوم الجمعة اجبر خاطر كل مكسور، وفرج هم كل مهموم، وأدخل السعادة في قلب كل حزين، واشفِ برحمتك كل من يتألم، واقضِ بكرمك كل حوائجنا، واستجب كل دعواتنا، واغفر ذنوبنا، وارزق نفوسنا الراحة والطمأنينة، واحفظنا بعينك التي لا تنام، وارحمنا برحمتك يا أرحم الراحمين ✨
اللهم ارزق كل من يقرأ هذه الكلمات سعادةً تملأ قلبه، وطمأنينةً تشرح صدره، وفرجًا يبدد همَّه، وتوفيقًا يلازمه في كل أمر، واجعل أيامه عامرةً بذكرك، وخاتمته ع…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KAwwKe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أمي نبض قلبي💕 @aask_1 · 49,936 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
ملجئي ، اقتباسات حب ، تصاميم ، صور ، فيديوهات، مقاطع @SSSSSC · 94,242 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
دعاء للميت - ادعيه المتوفين - دعاء للمتوفي- لفقيدي @mm12a1 · 26,549 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قروية تُوحيفةة❤️” (@KAwwKe), 466 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KAwwKe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
