JIGARLAR AKKAUNTLARIMIZ KΓP TUNGI PAKETLARGA XOZIRDAN 50% SKIDKA QILISHNI BOSHLADIK!!!
β‘3

Channel
@KHOJA_RENT
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
18,274subscribers
-10,229 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002277361171 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KHOJA_RENT |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KHOJA_RENT |
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 18,274 | -193 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 18,467 | -227 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 18,694 | -125 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 18,819 | -184 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 19,003 | -304 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 19,307 | -345 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 19,652 | -155 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:46 | 19,807 | -165 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:29 | 19,972 | -79 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:09 | 20,051 | -2,345 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 22,396 | -88 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 22,484 | -86 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 22,570 | -99 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:29 | 22,669 | -102 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 22,771 | -125 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 22,896 | -120 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 23,016 | -164 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 23,180 | -180 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 23,360 | -135 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 23,495 | first reading |
92 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 92 (22 January 2026 β 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 41,510 |
| Reactions total | 365 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
3,060 reactions across 81 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 2,190 | 71.6% | |
| π₯ | 369 | 12.1% | |
| π€© | 97 | 3.17% | |
| π | 76 | 2.48% | |
| π | 68 | 2.22% | |
| β‘ | 52 | 1.70% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 35 | 1.14% | |
| π | 35 | 1.14% | |
| π | 30 | 0.98% | |
| π | 29 | 0.948% | |
| π€ | 18 | 0.588% | |
| π₯° | 15 | 0.49% | |
| π | 12 | 0.392% | |
| π³ | 9 | 0.294% | |
| π«‘ | 9 | 0.294% | |
| π | 8 | 0.261% | |
| π | 6 | 0.196% | |
| π | 2 | 0.065% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 3,060 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @KHOJA_RENT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 January 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
JIGARLAR AKKAUNTLARIMIZ KΓP TUNGI PAKETLARGA XOZIRDAN 50% SKIDKA QILISHNI BOSHLADIK!!!
β‘3
JIGARLAR BΓSH AKKAUNTLARIMIZ KΓP TUNGI PAKETLARNI XOZIRDAN ΓZINI NARXIGA BERISHNI BOLADIK!!
π₯3β€1
JIGARLAR HOZR HAMMA AKKAUNTLARGA SKITKA KETVOTTI 3 SOATGA OLIB ERTAGACH OYNASHIZ MUMKUN YANI DOUTRA HISOBIDA
ASSALAMU ALEYKUM JIGARLAR TUZUMISZILAR HOZRDAN BO'SH AKKAUNTLARIMIZNI O'Z NARXIDA TUNGI PAKRTGA OLISHLARIZ MUMKUN
β€5
AKKAUNTLA BOβSH BEMALOL YOZURILA 3 SOATGA OSELAR 1 SOAT BONUSπ 6 SOATGA OSELAR 2 SOAT BONUSπ 12 SOATGA OSELAR 4 SOAT BONUS π 24 SOATGA OSELAR 6 SOAT BONUS π BU BONUS 18:00 GACHA AMAL QILADI @KHOJA_ARENDA 24/7 β
β€1
BO'SH AKKAUNTLARIMIZ KO'P TUNGI PAKETGA 50% SKITKADA QIBERVOMMIZA
BO'SH AKKAUNTLARIMIZ KO'P ARZON NARXLARDA BERVOMMIZA ADMIN ONLINE YOZURILAR
JIGARLAR AKKAUNTLARIMIZ KΓP TUNGI PAKETLARGA XOZIRDAN 50% SKIDKA QILISHNI BOSHLADIK!!!
β€4
2x keranbit karta kerak! Sotib olamiz yokida sotib beramiz bozor narxidan pastroqqa @KHOJA_UC
β€1
BO'SH AKKAUNTLARIMIZ KO'P TUNGI PAKETGA HOZRDAN O'Z NARXIDA OLISHINGIZ MUMKUN
β€4
AKKAUNTLA BOβSH BEMALOL YOZURILA 3 SOATGA OSELAR 1 SOAT BONUSπ 6 SOATGA OSELAR 2 SOAT BONUSπ 12 SOATGA OSELAR 4 SOAT BONUS π 24 SOATGA OSELAR 6 SOAT BONUS π BU BONUS 16:00 GACHA AMAL QILADI @KHOJA_ARENDA 24/7 β
β€2π2π€©2
πOpen budjet ovoz olish Boshlandi Narxlar balandlariβοΈ BUNDAN KEYIN ULGIRME QOLASLA QIMMATLEDI DEB OβYLAMELAR TUGAYAPDU UJE SAYT ISHLAME QOTB QOLYAPD 1-ta ovoz uchun 120 ucπ yoki 25.000 som 2-ta ovoz uchun 325 ucπ yoki 50.000 som 3-ta ovoz uchun 420 ucπ yoki 80.000 som Yana bosa narx qmmatlab keturadi π€ π¨βπ»MUROJAT: @khoja_budjet
β€5
Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @KHOJA_RENT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@KHOJA_RENT edited 2 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ²π―πΆπ±π¨ πΉπ¬π΅π»β (@KHOJA_RENT), 18,274 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KHOJA_RENT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.