Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net -760. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 19,704โ20,807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 11:06
19,914
-13
4 Nov 2026, 09:49
19,927
-8
3 Nov 2026, 06:36
19,935
-8
2 Nov 2026, 09:05
19,943
-5
1 Nov 2026, 10:37
19,948
+117
31 Oct 2026, 09:50
19,831
-19
30 Oct 2026, 07:59
19,850
-21
29 Oct 2026, 06:59
19,871
-16
28 Oct 2026, 06:28
19,887
+3
27 Oct 2026, 03:07
19,884
-5
26 Oct 2026, 01:08
19,889
+2
24 Oct 2026, 21:37
19,887
-15
23 Oct 2026, 23:00
19,902
-12
22 Oct 2026, 22:08
19,914
-13
21 Oct 2026, 22:06
19,927
-13
20 Oct 2026, 15:29
19,940
-6
19 Oct 2026, 16:46
19,946
-5
18 Oct 2026, 16:29
19,951
-16
17 Oct 2026, 19:21
19,967
-13
16 Oct 2026, 20:58
19,980
first reading
Engagement
169 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
5.08%
avg views รท 19,914 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.96%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 169 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
169 (3 August 2026 โ 4 November 2026)
Views total
22,239
Reactions total
1,992
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 03:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
โ7,150
Videos
โ777
Links
โ625
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 6 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
19m 08s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 75 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
8,697 reactions across 169 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
1,110
12.8%
โคโ๐ฅ
942
10.8%
๐ฅ
931
10.7%
๐
742
8.53%
โก
740
8.51%
๐
709
8.15%
๐ฏ
709
8.15%
๐
697
8.01%
๐ฅฐ
682
7.84%
๐
681
7.83%
๐ค
644
7.40%
๐พ
108
1.24%
๐
2
0.023%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 169 of the 169 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 8,697 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 7 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (31.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @KING_OF_OTC_q. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@KING_OF_OTC_q edited 1 post after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 28 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Arab Forex Traders๐ฅ @ArabForex2019 ยท 19,722 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 28 September 2026
AI For Trading @AI_FOR_TRADING ยท 19,888 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here โ alongside 73 others โ read 25 September 2026
ุชูุตูุงุช ูููุชูุณ |VIP ููุชูุณ ุชุฏุงูู ุตููุงุช @koutaiba_sharaf2 ยท 19,216 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here โ alongside 66 others โ read 25 September 2026
Doaa Hassan Trader @DOAA_HASSAN_TRADER ยท 28,308 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here โ alongside 65 others โ read 22 September 2026
SYRIANOOO TRADER(QUOTEX) @syrianooo00 ยท 54,986 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 1 September 2026
Fadi @Trading_With_Fadi ยท 19,058 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here โ alongside 69 others โ read 30 September 2026
IQGULF - ุงููุงุฆุฏ ุงูู ุฑูุฎู @IQGULF ยท 33,270 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 1 September 2026
Zinou Dz Trader @zinoudztrader ยท 82,180 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 18 August 2026
ะฒ @tarektr ยท 847 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here โ alongside 80 others โ read 21 August 2026
EyaD Trader @EyadTrader ยท 18,337 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 5 October 2026
DREAM SINAIS - ุฅุดุงุฑุงุช ู ุฌุงููุฉ ๐ @dreamsignalsa ยท 22,252 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here โ alongside 69 others โ read 30 September 2026
BLACK WOLVES๐ฅ๐ฆ @BLACKWOLVESARAB ยท 26,515 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here โ alongside 66 others โ read 21 September 2026
๐ฅ๐ฑ ู ุญุชุฑููู ุชุฏุงูู ๐ฑ๐ฅ @ABOFESALVIP ยท 37,002 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 6 September 2026
Vixunity Trade ๐ฉ๐ฟ @vixunity ยท 21,753 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 20 September 2026
Mai khaled trader @maikhaledtrader222 ยท 48,382 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here โ alongside 70 others โ read 25 August 2026
QUOTEX SIGNALS BOT M5๐ค @QuotexSignalsBot_M5 ยท 18,832 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here โ alongside 67 others โ read 4 October 2026
BILLIONAIRE DZ QUOTEX Signals๐๐๐ฐ @BILLIONAIREDZZ ยท 68,989 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here โ alongside 70 others โ read 30 September 2026
OneUp FX Mastery ๐ถ๐ฆ @one_up_fx_mastery ยท 34,014 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 3 September 2026
Mai khaled trader in Forex @maikhaledtraderforex ยท 35,079 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 1 September 2026
ุงูููุตุฑ @alqaysarTrader2025 ยท 21,824 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here โ alongside 71 others โ read 18 September 2026
Eyad Trader Quotex Bot ๐ค1๏ธโฃ @EyadTraderBot ยท 21,076 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 23 September 2026
Quotex Trader 7777 @quotextrader_7777 ยท 102,516 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here โ alongside 69 others โ read 30 August 2026
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ @Qoutexfreesignal1 ยท 28,924 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here โ alongside 69 others โ read 20 September 2026
Tarek Ali ยท Smart Option Signals โก @tarekalioptions ยท 33,448 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ ๐ถ๐ญ ๐ถ๐ป๐ชโ (@KING_OF_OTC_q), 19,914 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KING_OF_OTC_q.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.