Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рест┃۫ ׅ🌻L͜͡i͜͡t͜͡h͜͡i͜͡u͜͡m͜͡ P͜͡h͜͡o͜͡s͜͡p͜͡h͜͡a͜͡s͜͡ ͜͡🌻۫ ⧽

Channel

Рест┃۫ ׅ🌻L͜͡i͜͡t͜͡h͜͡i͜͡u͜͡m͜͡ P͜͡h͜͡o͜͡s͜͡p͜͡h͜͡a͜͡s͜͡ ͜͡🌻۫ ⧽

@KISs_Me_QWQ

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

298subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002437553790
TypeChannel
Username@KISs_Me_QWQ
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KISs_Me_QWQ

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

291300295.56 August 2026 — 291 subscribers7 August 2026 — 291 subscribers15 August 2026 — 296 subscribers23 August 2026 — 300 subscribers30 August 2026 — 298 subscribers8 September 2026 — 300 subscribers17 September 2026 — 298 subscribers2986 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 290–301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 00:01298-2
8 Sept 2026, 13:00300+2
30 Aug 2026, 19:57298-2
23 Aug 2026, 22:27300+4
15 Aug 2026, 05:28296+5
7 Aug 2026, 06:19291no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:31291first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

239 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥4820.1%
4318.0%
3715.5%
custom 54295765289355571573313.8%
💘2912.1%
custom 5454332905113296057197.95%
🍓145.86%
custom 5357168813458628229135.44%
custom 524466909869195626820.837%
🍌10.418%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC42 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @thel4nt1k

ㅤ 🐶 5️⃣ >> 2️⃣2️⃣0️⃣ я завтра начну делать эдит хорошо хочу играть

6 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC54 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @HromaElkaPhoto

✨Буду очень благодарна и рада за репост ✨

❤‍🔥6💘1

5 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC64 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sovaletiPhoto

Можно считать это внезапным трейдом? Для любителя эротики

❤‍🔥11💘431

5 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC113 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Осторожно, эротика 🤭 Горячие кошечки для хорошего человека ❤️🍓

custom 542957652893555715717custom 53571688134586282299custom 545433290511329605795❤‍🔥2💘2

5 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC86 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ребят и по поводу этого Кто хочет пойти в пол десятого в ран , сразу пишите сюда, чтобы собрать людей и в дс сервер/Лолку/или тут , что бвам вам кинуть приглашение в друзья (2/3 из 8оми есть) Простите кстати за щп

94❤‍🔥4💘2

5 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC88 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В принципе можем сделать в пятницу сбор орды здесь, чтобы поиграть в дв, кто за?

❤‍🔥754💘4

5 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC78 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ребят, у меня давным давно был сайт Если хотите можете там что то написать, спросить или даже что то нарисовать ^^ https://lithiumion.straw.page

6💘65❤‍🔥2🍌1

5 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC175 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🦄🟤🟤🟤 Я СДЕЛАЛА ЭТО, ЮХУУУУУ честно очень сильно люблю немецкую версию психо Тэдди, поэтому решила попробовать с Фантазией попробовать бахнуть анимацию) 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌺буду не против рт в канал и кусание за бочек, чтобы я спала адекватно (час сна не круто, ребят)🦄

custom 5429576528935557157168custom 545433290511329605784💘4custom 52446690986919562682custom 53571688134586282292

5 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC89 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Мне нужен психолог

🍓13❤‍🔥862custom 53571688134586282292custom 54543329051132960572

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @KISs_Me_QWQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рест┃۫ ׅ🌻L͜͡i͜͡t͜͡h͜͡i͜͡u͜͡m͜͡ P͜͡h͜͡o͜͡s͜͡p͜͡h͜͡a͜͡s͜͡ ͜͡🌻۫ ⧽” (@KISs_Me_QWQ), 298 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KISs_Me_QWQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.