Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АРХИВ 𝒯𝒽𝑒 𝒲𝒾𝓉𝒸𝒽 𝔅𝑜𝓎 & 𝒯𝑒𝑒𝓀𝓁

Channel

АРХИВ 𝒯𝒽𝑒 𝒲𝒾𝓉𝒸𝒽 𝔅𝑜𝓎 & 𝒯𝑒𝑒𝓀𝓁

@KLARIONeot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003744699807
TypeChannel
Username@KLARIONeot
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 28 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KLARIONeot

Growth

34363510 August 2026 — 36 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36 subscribers2 September 2026 — 34 subscribers10 August 20262 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 23 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 18:3434-2
10 Aug 2026, 23:0136no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:4536first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 34 subscribers
Avg views / post
5.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
100.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 April 20269 August 2026)
Views total5
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

140 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👻5337.9%
🎃4632.9%
👀4129.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC5 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ҁϯⱀѧʜʜѧᴙ ѫєʜѱџʜѧ κѳ ʍʜє πѳđѳɯʌѧ, ʜє џҁπƴґѧʌѧҁƀ Ϯџκʌѧ. ѲѣӀӌʜѳ єґѳ πƴґѧѥϯҁᴙ, ʜѧӡӀʙѧѥϯ đƀᴙʙѳʌѳʍ, ʜѳ ѳʜџ ҁѧʍџ ʜє ҁʙᴙϯӀє, κѳґđѧ ҁʍєѥϯ ґѳʙѳⱀџϯƀ ѳ ʜҽʍ ӌϯѳ-ϯѳ πʌѳχѳє. Ѧ єҁʌџ ѳѣѳ ʍʜє ϯʙєⱀđᴙϯ... ᛖєʜᴙ ϶ϯѳ ʜє ϯѧκ ҁџʌƀʜѳ ʙѳʌʜƴєϯ. ҀʍєⱀϯʜӀє ѫџʙƴϯ, ѣѳᴙϯҁᴙ, ӡʜѧѥϯ, ӌϯѳ ƴ ʜџχ ʜєϯƴ κѧκѳӣ-ϯѳ ҁџʌӀ. Ѧ ƴ ʍєʜᴙ єҽ đѳҁϯѧϯѳӌʜѳ, ӌϯѳѣӀ ѫџϯƀ џ ʜѧҁʌѧѫđѧϯƀҁᴙ ѫџӡʜƀѥ! Џ ҁʙѳџʍ πƴϯєɯєҁϯʙџєʍ. Џʜϯєⱀєҁʜѳ, κѧκ ҁєӣӌѧҁ ʍѳӣ ʜѧⱀѳđ.. Ɓҁπѳʍџʜѧѥϯ ʌџ ѳѣѳ ʍʜє? Δƴʍѧ

👻3🎃1👀1

2 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC17 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ꋪ ҁѣєґѧʌ ѳϯ ʜѧđѳєđʌџʙӀχ ҁϯⱀѧѫʜџκѳʙ, κѳϯѳⱀӀє ʙѳӡѳʍʜџʌџ ҁєѣє, ӌϯѳ џʍ ʙҁҽ ʍѳѫʜѳ! ⴼє ʍѳґƴ πѳʙєⱀџϯƀ, ӌϯѳ ѫџϯєʌџ ѫџʙƴϯ ʙ ϯѧκѳӣ ϯєҁʜѳϯє ҁ ʜџʍџ. Ƴ ʜџχ ґʌѧӡѧ, κѧκ ƴ κƴⱀџҵӀ, πѳ ʜџʍ ϶ϯѳ ʙџđʜѳ! Ҟ ҁӌѧҁϯƀѥ... ꋪ ҁκѳʌƀӡʜƴʌ ʙ ϯѳʌπƴ. Џ ʜџκϯѳ ʍєʜᴙ ʜє ƴʙџđєʌ ʙ ʜєӣ. Ѧ ᴙѣʌѳκџ ϯƴϯ, κҁϯѧϯџ, ʜєπʌѳχџє. Δƴʍѧʌ, χƴѫє. Ҁєӣӌѧҁ ʌєѫƴ ʙ κѧκѳʍ-ϯѳ πєⱀєƴʌκє.. ∏ѳđѧʌƀɯє ѳϯ ӌƴѫџχ ґʌѧӡ. Џ ѳϯ ϶ϯџχ ѳχⱀѧʜʜџκѳʙ, κѳϯѳⱀӀє ѳϯ ʙҁєґѳ ӡʌᴙϯҁᴙ. ⴼє ӡʜѧѥ, κƴđѧ ᴙ đѧʌƀɯє π

🎃3👀3👻3

31 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC18 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Клэрион бродил по Готэму, разглядывая его тесные переулки, "серых" жителей, вывески и всему подобное. Напоминает его родную деревню под землёй. Уши спрятаны под капюшоном, на руках Тикл, но под мантией, чтобы никто не спрашивал про красные глаза кота. Вдруг подумают чего. Он не желал получать внимания от людей, которых видит впервые, поэтому молча шёл, куда глаза глядят. Ну и самое главное... Не наткнуться на стражн

👻5🎃2👀2

26 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC22 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

∏ⱀѳʜџκ ʙ Ґѳϯ϶ʍ. ҀϯⱀѧɯʜӀӣ ґѳⱀѳđ, ʜѳ ʜє đʌᴙ ʍєʜᴙ. Ҟѳӣʜƴ πⱀџχѳđџϯҁᴙ πⱀᴙϯѧϯƀҁᴙ πѳđ ʍѳєӣ ʍѧʜϯџєӣ, πѳϯѳʍƴ ӌϯѳ ʍѧʌѳ ʌџ? Ҟϯѳ ӡʜѧєϯ ϶ϯџχ! Ѧ ʍѳџ ƴɯџ? Ϯѳѫє πⱀᴙӌƴ. ⴼє ʌѥѣʌѥ ᴙ πⱀᴙϯѧϯƀ, ʜѳ ϶ϯѳϯ ґѳⱀѳđ ʙӀʜƴѫđѧєϯ! Ϯƴϯ ʙҁҽ ҁєⱀѳє, κѧκ џ ʌѥđџ. Ƴđџʙʌєʜ, ӌϯѳ ґѳⱀѳđ єѱҽ ѫџʙѳӣ.

👻6🎃4👀4

17 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC48 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ҟѳʜџ! ϮƴπӀє ҁƴѱєҁϯʙѧ! Ѳʜџ ʜѧπƴґѧʌџ Ϯџκʌѧ! Ѳʜ ҁѣєѫѧʌ ʜѧ đєⱀєʙѳ, ѧ ᴙ єґѳ єʌє κѧκ đѳҁϯѧʌ! ᛖѧґџѥ џҁπѳʌƀӡѳʙѧϯƀ ʜє ʍѳґ, πѳϯѳʍƴ ӌϯѳ ʜєπѳđѧʌҽκƴ ѣӀʌџ ʌѥđџ, ѧ ƴ ʜџχ ʜѥχ ʜѧ ʙѳʌɯєѣҁϯʙѳ. Ϯџκʌ ҁπƴҁϯџʌҁᴙ, κѳґđѧ ᴙ đѳҁϯѧʌ... ⱀӀѣƴ.

🎃7👀6👻6

12 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC58 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

∏ⱀѳɯҽʌ ʍџʍѳ ⴼѳκϯґⱀѧđѧ. Ҁκѧѫƴ ӌєҁϯʜѳ, ʙӀґʌᴙđџϯ ϶ϯѧ ҁϯѳʌџҵѧ ʍⱀѧӌʜѳ. ꋪ ґʌᴙʜƴʌ ʜѧ ʙѳⱀѳϯѧ, ѧ ϯѧʍ ҁϯѳᴙϯ ҁϯⱀѧѫʜџκџ. ⴼє ӡʜѧѥ, ʌѥѣᴙϯ ʌџ ѳʜџ ϯҽʍʜӀχ ϶ʌƀѻѳʙ џʌџ ʜєϯ, ʜѳ πѳ џχ ʌџҵƴ ʍѳѫʜѳ πⱀѳӌџϯѧϯƀ, ӌϯѳ ѳʜџ ⱀєđκѳ ѣӀʙѧѥϯ ⱀѧđѳҁϯʜӀʍџ. Ҟѳʜєӌʜѳ, ᴙ ʍѳґƴ πⱀѳѣⱀѧϯƀҁᴙ ϯƴđѧ.. ∏ⱀѳҁϯѳ πѳҁʍѳϯⱀєϯƀ, κѧκџє đѳʍѧ џ ѫџϯєʌџ, ʜѳ ʜѧđѳ πⱀѳđƴʍѧϯƀ ϶ϯѳϯ πʌѧʜ. ⴼѳӌєʙѧϯƀ ѣƴđƴ ʜєπѳđѧʌҽκƴ.

🎃6👀6👻5

11 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC68 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ꋪ ʙđѧʌџ ѳϯ ҁʙѳєґѳ đѳʍѧ, ѧ ϯѳӌʜєє ҁʙєⱀχƴ. Ҁʜџӡƴ ʍѳᴙ ҁєʍƀᴙ ʙѳʌʜƴєϯҁᴙ ӡѧ ʍєʜᴙ, ʜѳ ʜѧʙєⱀχƴ ʜєϯƴ ϯѳґѳ, ӌєґѳ ʍѳѫʜѳ ѣѳᴙϯƀҁᴙ. Ϯѳʌƀκѳ ҁʌӀχѧʌ, ӌϯѳ ʙ Ґѳʍѳⱀⱀє ʍѧґџᴙ ӡѧπⱀєѱєʜѧ џ ӡѧ ϶ϯѳ πѳʌѧґѧєϯҁᴙ ҁʍєⱀϯʜѧᴙ κѧӡʜƀ. ⴼƴ џ ʜƴ, ӌϯѳ ӡѧ ґѳҁƴđѧⱀҁϯʙѳ! ⴼѳ πѳκѧ ᴙ ϯƴđѧ ʜє πѳӣđƴ. Δєⱀѫƴ πƴϯƀ ʙ ҁϯѳⱀѳʜƴ ⴼѳκϯґⱀѧđѧ. Ҁєӣӌѧҁ ҁđєʌѧʌџ πєⱀєⱀӀʙ, ӌϯѳѣӀ Ϯџκʌ πѳєʌ ʍӀɯκƴ. ∏ⱀѳ ⴼѳκϯґⱀѧđ ᴙ ʍѧʌѳ ӡʜѧѥ, πѳ϶ϯѳʍƴ ѫєʌѧѥ πѳѣӀʙѧϯƀ ϯѧʍ. Ӡѧӌєʍ ᴙ ʙѳѳѣѱє ʙєđƴ ϶ϯѳϯ đʜєʙʜџκ?

🎃5👻5👀4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KLARIONeot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АРХИВ 𝒯𝒽𝑒 𝒲𝒾𝓉𝒸𝒽 𝔅𝑜𝓎 & 𝒯𝑒𝑒𝓀𝓁” (@KLARIONeot), 34 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KLARIONeot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.