Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net +49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,178–2,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 22:41
2,236
-10
12 Sept 2026, 20:19
2,246
+20
9 Sept 2026, 05:58
2,226
+10
3 Sept 2026, 14:40
2,216
+29
2 Sept 2026, 18:31
2,187
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 2,236 subscribers
Avg views / post
293
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
13 (2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
3,808
Reactions total
1,008
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 18:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 55s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,008 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😭
396
39.3%
🔥
294
29.2%
💋
206
20.4%
💘
42
4.17%
🤝
38
3.77%
🦄
11
1.09%
☃
7
0.694%
🍓
7
0.694%
🌚
5
0.496%
🆒
2
0.198%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,008 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وضعیت کامنتا رو میبینم واقعا ازینکه تو فندوم ایرانم خجالت میکشم .
جدی درک این موضوع که این کار طبق هر قانون و تو هر جایی غلط بوده اینقدر مشکله ؟ یکبار به جای شیپتون به خود پسرا فکر کنید . تهکوکی که واسه جیمین صدتا صدتا آدم میفرستن زیر قطار ، اگر همچین چیزی رو میدیدن بنظر خودتون طرف رو جر نمیدادن ؟
امروز وسط کنسرت یک مریضی گوشیش رو پرت میکنه سمت جیمین !!
خورده و نخورده ، پوینت مهم قضیه اینه که یک شی که به گفته اون کاربر گوشی بوده ، و متعلق به یک تهکوکر شیپ استن هم بوده پرت شده روی استیج . اینکه به جیمین نخورده یا آسیبی بهش نزده یا جیمین احتمالا و خدارو شکر زمان پرت شدن اون گوشی بهش نرسیده ، غلط بودن این کار رو توجیه نمیکنه . ممکنه پس فردا عمل خطرناکتری صورت بگیره!
بنابراین حتما همتون برید و همراه با ویدیویی ک…
چچچ ... ببخشیددددد ؟!؟ 😭
جیکوک این پارت از Fire و لیریکِ " هرطور دوست داری زندگی کن ، در هر صورت مال خودته " ، رو روبروی هم میخونن و ... ها ؟!
درست دیدم ؟ جیمین اول به جونگکوک و بعد به خودش اشاره کرد :)؟ ﷼﷼÷×*#
اوکی ! we got it پارک جیمین !
تو باز هم به مردت و بقیه نشون دادی زندگیِ تو جونگکوکه و تو متعلق به خودشی ! 😭
لحظهی ترک محل استیج جیکوک طبق معمولِ ورود و خروج باهمشون ، دو نفره در حال ترک اونجا بودن که جیمینی یکهو از کمر جونگکوک میگیره و برش میگردونه تا پسرش به خاطر تولدش یکبار دیگه جلوی دوربین وایسته و از آرمی ها تشکر کنه و خداحافظی کنه ^‿^
جیمین امروز ثابت کرد که بیشتر از خود جونگکوک به روز تولدش اهمیت میده و براش با ارزشه و چیبگم ... زندگی رو بردی جیکی! :]
جیمین : امروز ، تولد جونگکوکه . این یک روز خوشحال کنندهس . و من این روز شاد رو برای مدت طولانی به خاطر میسپارم .
جیمین تو سخنرانیِ آخر خودش میگه که کنسرتشون براش به یادموندنی میشه چون تولد جونگکوکش بوده !
درسته ! جیمین همیشه و تو تموم این سالها همینقدر به روز به دنیا اومدن عزیزترینِ زندگیش اهمیت داده و میده و فشاری هم میتونه تا ابد بابتش فشار بخوره ! ؛)☝️🏻
جونگکوک امروز بیشتر از هر زمان دیگهای تلاش کرد که باز هم جلوی سربهسر گذاشتن های پسرا وایسته و روز تولدش کنار جیمین بشینه =))
و موفق شد و نشست ! نشست و به ثانیه نکشید که دوباره رفت تو دنیای دونفرهی خودش و پسرش و یواشکی هاشون و لحظهی آخر جین هیونگ به قلب بی قرار جونگکوک رحم نکرد و به هر زوری بود بلندش کرد 😭🤏🏻
جونگکوک امروز بعد از تبریک پسرا واسه تولدش ، اومد کنار استیج و تاج و پیرهن تولدش رو به یک دختر خانومی که روی ویلچر نشسته بود داد و واسش یک لبخند قشنگ زد =) 🤏🏻
و نمیدونم ㅜㅜ
فقط گریه کردم چون یاد همین رفتار مشابهی که جیمین قبلا انجام داده بود افتادم ㅠㅠ
جونگکوک خیلی قبلتر از اینها و تو یکی از اپیزود های ران بهمون گفته بود که حتی تو خوب و مهربون بودن هم از فرشتهی سقوط کردهش الگو میگیره ! 😭
کادوی دوم جیمینی : بغل گرم و نرمش که به عقیدهی پسرش گرمترین آغوش دنیاست ! ^^
😭71💋10💘6☃4
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @KMSerenity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“݁ ֪ 𝗄𝗈𝗈𝗄𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗒 ^᪲” (@KMSerenity), 2,236 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KMSerenity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.