先来个反馈
👍1

Channel
@KPM888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
11,838subscribers
-1,091 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002629123912 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KPM888 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KPM888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 11,838 | -76 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:09 | 11,914 | -113 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 12,027 | -77 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 12,104 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 12,101 | -48 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 12,149 | -47 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 12,196 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 12,201 | +43 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 12,158 | -39 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 12,197 | +24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 12,173 | +51 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 12,122 | +89 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 12,033 | +75 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 11,958 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 11,950 | -13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 11,963 | -27 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 11,990 | -44 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 12,034 | -208 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 12,242 | -76 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 12,318 | first reading |
158 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 114 of 138 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 158 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 312,840 |
| Reactions total | 418 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
438 reactions across 130 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 359 | 82.0% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 10.0% | |
| 😍 | 11 | 2.51% | |
| 😡 | 6 | 1.37% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.685% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.457% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.457% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.457% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.228% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.228% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.228% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.228% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.228% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.228% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.228% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.228% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.228% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
先来个反馈
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
•完美版本!尽情享受! 和平的追踪自瞄配置到手微调即可使用!默认的配置做过调试 失控的自瞄这些配置需要自己根据自己设备喜好来调!下个版本也会在默认配置上给你们做调试/这个版本忘了 🤪更新补偿福利: 所有未到期卡密全体加时! 加的时长为24个连续自然小时,折合1440分钟或86400秒 •自行查看你们的卡密时长 全部已加
👍5🏆1🐳1🤩1🥰1
---------------➡️KPM_Kernel更新公告⬅️--------------- ⚫️完美兼容和平全新游戏版本 🟣和平新增三款类型断点追踪 🔘和平纯视觉陀螺仪吸附优化 🔴失控新增动态压枪辅助功能 🔘失控重构底层规避检测逻辑 🟡陀螺仪接入纯内核视觉吸附 ⚫️完美修复解决已知全部问题 🫥最新版本号:v2.2.1 Ps:KPM内核长期招收代理/轻松日赚1000+ 注意:失控闪框解密不是纯算法/选择性使用/风险未知/建议用于应急 和平纯算法放心使用! ---------------🔔全新版本已上传官网🔔--------------- 下载地址👍 http://cccc996.ysepan.com/ [访问密码:6666] 官方频道:✅ https://t.me/KPM888 提卡地址:✅ https://shop.368fk.cn/shop/kpm888 客服地址👍 https://t.me/KPM44 免…
👍5🍾1👌1👏1
招募几个比较靠谱的内测人员,如果成功协助完成内测 奖励任意版本一张3天卡密,弱智不要来找我! 客服: @KPM44 双向联系: @KPM44bot
👍6❤1
你们的反馈我们都已收到! 目前基本上我们已经收集了已知的所有BUG以及问题! 基本上已经在还未发布的v2.2.1上全面修复 为啥还不发布? 因为和平全新游戏版本迫在眉睫! 我们在游戏大版本更新后同步更新!
👍6
温馨提示:失控被举报后后出现闪框 解决方法很简单 把KPM退出把游戏划掉 然后重新打开启动KPM以及游戏就会自动修复(不理解的直接关机重启即可自动修复)
👍4
自瞄没效果联系客服做测试 客服: @KPM44 双向联系: @KPM44bot
👍7❤1
反馈进服五分钟直接拿半手得吃AK
👍4
关于这没效果那没效果的,请在对局中初始化,如果还有问题请联系客服反馈
👍4
5系6系驱动不适配的联系我,自瞄没效果的,任何问题留言,我会一一解决
👍4❤1
关于物资绘制和人物绘制没效果,自瞄没效果是因为在大厅就初始化了,请在对局中点初始化
Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @KPM888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@KPM888 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KPM_Kernel” (@KPM888), 11,838 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KPM888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.