12 measurements spanning 30 days, net -342. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,611–10,055 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 21:21
9,662
-59
2 Sept 2026, 07:08
9,721
-31
30 Aug 2026, 05:25
9,752
-55
27 Aug 2026, 14:03
9,807
+40
24 Aug 2026, 19:34
9,767
-37
21 Aug 2026, 09:35
9,804
-45
18 Aug 2026, 04:42
9,849
-55
14 Aug 2026, 22:58
9,904
-34
11 Aug 2026, 15:23
9,938
-49
8 Aug 2026, 10:56
9,987
-17
7 Aug 2026, 16:01
10,004
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:50
10,004
first reading
Engagement
93 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 9,662 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,020
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 93 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 81 of 83 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
93 (6 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
167,568
Reactions total
15,865
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21m 37s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18,160 reactions across 91 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,549
14.0%
❤🔥
2,358
13.0%
💅
2,277
12.5%
🔥
2,044
11.3%
💘
1,318
7.26%
😭
1,270
6.99%
🍓
998
5.50%
🤣
862
4.75%
👍
665
3.66%
🐳
518
2.85%
👏
501
2.76%
👎
447
2.46%
💔
439
2.42%
💋
342
1.88%
🤮
283
1.56%
😐
245
1.35%
⚡
186
1.02%
🤷♂
177
0.975%
🌚
139
0.765%
🤡
124
0.683%
15 further kinds
418
2.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آپدیتهای اخیر جونگیون عضو توایس بهخاطر 'گرلفرند متریال' بودنش🎀 کلی وایرال شده و نتیزنها میگن بعد از رفتن از JYP انقدر تغییر کرده که انگار کمپانی تمام مدت داشته جلوی پیشرفت و نشون دادن ویژگیهای زنانهش رو میگرفته👀
╭┈ #Jeongyeon
KPOPBASE
گروه لسرافیم در مراسم⌯K-World Dream Awards 2026⌯لیپسینک کردنشون توسط یونجین لو رفت،که بازم کلی موردانتقاد و تمسخرقرار گرفتن نتیزن میگن اونا معیار اصلی آیدل بودن ندارن و باید این روند رو متوقف کنن؛فناشونم برای دفاع گفتن استفاده از بکترک در این مراسم بین بیشتر آرتیستا رایج بوده که بازم کاربران بحث اجراهای قبلیشون و لیپ سینک کردن حتی زمان نشستن رو وسط کشیدن😶.
•با نتیزنا موافقید یا فیرنات(فندوم لسرافیم)؟نتیزن🍓/فیرنات…
طبق گزارشات نایون، Twice یه زمین و یه ساختمون در منطقهٔ لوکس⌯Cheongdam-dong⌯در گانگنام سئول،به ارزش⌯6.9⌯ میلیون دلار خریده که بخاطر ریچ بودنش موردتوجه قرارگرفته💸💅🏻.
╭┈ #Nayeon
KPOPBASE
شما تعجب کردید؟ من که نه💁♀️
بازیگر کیمسوهیون پدوفیل قراره مجری مراسم بزرگ The Fact Music Awards باشه و نظرات متفاوتی دریافت کرده
برخی از مردم گفتن چطور میتونید یک پدوفیل رو به آیدلهای دختر کم سنوسال اینجوری نزدیک کنید؟
برخی هم گفتن هرآیدلی که توی مراسم برای این بازیگر دست بزنه رو کنسل میکنن‼️👏
البته بسیاری هم ازش حمایت کردن
برخی نظرات
1. مطمئنم پول داده تا مجری بشه. اون و شرکتش آدمهارو استخدام کردن تا ادای فن…
گروه کتزای اجراشون در جشنواره خیریه Daisy Chain Fields که توسط اولیویا رودریگو برگزار میشد رو کنسل کردن❗️و از طرفدارها معذرتخواهی کردن
مچ پای مگان حین تمرین آسیب دیده و امیدواریم زودتر خوب شه🩷
╭┈ #Katseye #Megan
KPOPBASE
اخیراً بحثی بین کاربران درباره ویژوال ضعیف ممبرهای Bts شکل گرفته بعضی از کاربران معتقدن که Bts در مقایسه با همنسلیهاشون و همینطور آیدلهای نسلهای گذشته و فعلی کیپاپ،ویژوال خیلی ضعیفیی دارن،فنهاشون ازشون دفاع کردن پای خیلی از آیدلام بدون هیچ دلیلی وسط کشیدن و گفتن که اعضای Bts زیباان و ویژوال همهچیز نیست در نهایت این استعداد آیدله که حرف اول رو میزنه
کاربران ام در جواب گفتن :«اونا حتی استعداد خاصی که میگین رو…
فوتوکانسپتهای منتشر شده از جیسو عضو بلکپینک برای ترکش بهنام 'Click' که 4سپتامبر منتشر میشه، و لیسا عضو بلکپینک برای ترکش بهنام 'Sawadika' که 3سپتامبر منتشر میشه و بهنظر میرسه هرکدوم حالوهوای متفاوتی دارن👀✨️
╭┈ #Jisoo #Lisa
KPOPBASE
فنهای گروه VERIVERY حدس میزنن فنمیتینگ این گروه قراره در یک غار برگزار بشه❗️🤯 چون محل برگزاری هنوز اعلام نشده اما هشدارهای عجیبی به فنها داده شده و فوتوکانسپتهای آلبوم این گروه هم نزدیک معادن گرفته شده بوده👀
دستورالعملهایی که به فنهایی که قراره شرکت کنن داده شده:
– دمای داخل سالن ممکنه یکم پایین باشه، پس قبل از اجرا، وضعیت سلامتی و جسمی خودتون رو درنظربگیرید و حتما ژاکت با خودتون بیارید
– با توجه به نوع کفپوش…
لباس این بازیگر خانم Yoon Eun-hye (لباس مشکی) در عروسی آردنچو که در ایتالیا برگزار شده، موردپسند کرهایها نبوده و ازش انتقاد کردن😑
گفتن لباس مشکی نازک با گیپور شبیه لباسخواب پوشیده و خیلی نامناسب و زنندهست و حتی باعث میشه توجهها از عروس دور بشه
البته برخی هم گفتن عروسی توی ایتالیا برگزار شده و فرهنگش متفاوته و حتی در بخشی از مراسم، این بازیگر هانبوک پوشیده
حالا نتیزنها دوباره درمورد مدل عروسیهای کرهای صحبت …
💅381👍13❤2🤷♂1
Signed BLUĔ
Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @KPOPBASEI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BLΛƆKPIИK | بلک پینک @BLACKPINK4 · 32,412 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙆𝙋𝙊𝙋𝘽𝘼𝙎𝙀 | حواشی کیپاپ” (@KPOPBASEI), 9,662 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KPOPBASEI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.