Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КРИ timely & confession [18+]

Channel

КРИ timely & confession [18+]

@KRIcftime

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004361458162
TypeChannel
Username@KRIcftime
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KRIcftime

Growth

525553.514 August 2026 — 52 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52 subscribers29 August 2026 — 53 subscribers5 September 2026 — 55 subscribers14 August 20265 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 08:5755+2
29 Aug 2026, 06:2653+1
15 Aug 2026, 14:2252no change
14 Aug 2026, 14:1752first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4350.6%
🔥2225.9%
🥰1112.9%
🤔78.24%
👌11.18%
😁11.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC39 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Если аск нужен, то какой?

  1. Арт-аск14%
  2. Текстовый аск29%
  3. Смешанный48%
  4. Два разных10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC39 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Нужен ли аск?

  1. Да94%
  2. Нет6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC54 viewsread 14 August 2026

хочется зин по КРИ или текстовый/арт-аск... вот бы кто-нибудь этим занялся, эх. #щп × @KRIcftime × @KRIcf_bot

10 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC55 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026

можем ли мы поговорить об Александре в #реверс #ау, где он человек? я все думаю: будет ли императорским дивом в этом случае сам Колчак или император Владимир? если второй, то он кажется тем дивом из баек про Ван Хельсинга, который буквально размножает членов семьи для своего пропитания. 🤩 или у меня о нём настолько плохое мнение. а вообще я веду к тому, что в этой ау Гермес может стать императорском дивом, и это прос

5

10 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC52 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026

есть ли в КРИ незначительные вопросы, которые вас волнуют? меня, во-первых, чрезвычайно интересует личность автора «Чуди и Нави», я почему-то думала, что нам еë раскроют... а сейчас мне кажется, что это какая-то писательница из скита, которая писала под мужским псевдонимом. мало мне женщин в серии, приходится додумывать. во-вторых, мне очень понравился журналистский приём во 2й книге, когда в программе не говорили

🥰51😁1

10 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC49 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026

а вы тоже иногда начинаете задумываться о мире КРИ и месте дивов в нём. типа... отправлялись ли дивы в космос во время космической гонки? во всех ли странах дивы принадлежат государственным структурам и академиям? мне кажется, что строители из них бы получились хорошие. может, есть какие-то организации, которые устраивают у себя беглых дивов, выдавая им человеческие документы? в этой вселенной египетские пирамиды был

🤔74

9 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ch: #Анонимус & #Кузя & #Владимир cont: #арт source: post on tg support @podval_Draco on tg! <3

🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC38 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @podval_DracoPhoto

Хулиганство 👁️👄👁️

8👌1

9 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC51 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ch: #Кузя cont: #арт source: post on tg support @melllch1or on tg! <3

🔥3

9 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC42 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @melllch1orPhoto

Насколько я знаю, сегодня день рождения у Кузи (и Всемирный день кошек)😽 В честь такого события наскетчила любимого кошкомальчика

🔥71

9 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC52 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ch: #Кузя & #Гермес cont: #арт source: post on tg support @catsinthecloset on tg! <3

🔥4

9 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC48 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @catsintheclosetPhoto

ни один колдун не пострадал и не был сожран 🪼🪼 #арт #графаверин

🔥61

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @KRIcftime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Если аск нужен, то какой?

  1. Арт-аск14%
  2. Текстовый аск29%
  3. Смешанный48%
  4. Два разных10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

Нужен ли аск?

  1. Да94%
  2. Нет6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КРИ timely & confession [18+]” (@KRIcftime), 55 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KRIcftime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.