Channel
@KariLakeAZ
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,004subscribers
-62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001156229354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KariLakeAZ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2018 and 31 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KariLakeAZ |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 2,004 | -11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 2,015 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 2,022 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 2,034 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:09 | 2,039 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 2,048 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 2,049 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 2,051 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 2,053 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 2,057 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 2,062 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 2,063 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:40 | 2,066 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 2,066 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
359 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 114 | 31.8% | |
| ❤ | 79 | 22.0% | |
| 👏 | 64 | 17.8% | |
| 🤬 | 39 | 10.9% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 6.13% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 2.51% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 2.23% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 2.23% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 1.67% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 1.11% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.836% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.557% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.279% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
REVEALED: Top American generals formed a secret backchannel with a CCP military intelligence front that instructed them: “We wish you would advocate positions” favorable to China. Some ended up on China’s payroll. Join @NatalieWinters
😱9🤬5🤯1
Looking for life-changing reads? Barbara O’Neill shares her top 3 must-read books for health, personal growth, and inspiration. Most people spend years searching for better health... these books could save you that time. 📚🌿 People are buying these books faster than we expected... Everyone is talking about these books... One collection. Hundreds of practical wellness insights. Thousands of happy readers. 1. Barbara…
🥴2
7/21/26 | The Oval Office🇺🇸🦅 Subscribe and share👉 @KariLakeAZ
❤17🔥3
I wish someone had shown me this years ago... 🌿📖 Thousands of people swear by Barbara O'Neill's natural wellness advice—and after flipping through this book, it's easy to see why. One chapter in, and you'll understand why so many families keep Barbara O'Neill's books on their shelves. Learn how to heal without chemicals. Free Shipping Worldwide - Order Now👇💚 If you want to live healthy, buy the book today. 👇👇👇👇👇 h…
👍3❤1
I’m so honored to take part in the Independence Day Celebration on the National Mall this Saturday to offer a Prayer of Gratitude for our Nation and the Sacrifices of our Heroes. Everyone is welcome for what is sure to be one of the greatest days in our nation’s history. Please join us at 3:30 for Freedom250 at The Great American State Fair! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Subscribe and share👉 @KariLakeAZ
👍11❤10⚡1🔥1
Eric Swallwell BFF, Ruben Gallego used donor money for family travel, Super Bowl tickets, Disneyland tickets, and paid his mother-in-law hundreds of dollars from campaign funds for watching his kids records show https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/21/gallego-campaign-donors-travel-00969326 Subscribe and share👉 @KariLakeAZ
🤬27🤮3❤2
A CIA Career Officer Just Testified Under Oath: Fauci Intentionally Covered Up the COVID Lab Leak. Not a Republican congressman. Not a political operative. A career CIA operations officer testified that Fauci inserted himself into intelligence deliberations twice — February 2020 and June 2021 — to ensure analysts concluded COVID came from nature. The CIA retaliated against analysts who supported the lab leak hypothe…
👍16❤3🔥1🤬1
Thank you to President Trump for nominating me to serve as the next U.S. Ambassador to Jamaica. 🇺🇸🇯🇲 Jamaica is a country I know very well, full of incredible people, and if confirmed by the Senate, I look forward to strengthening the partnership between our nations, advancing America’s interests abroad, and building on the deep friendship shared by the American and Jamaican people. Honored to continue serving in t…
❤24👍8🤮1
“The billion-dollar healthcare industry does NOT want you to read this book and discover the shocking truth… After Barbara O’Neill released Sustain Me, demand exploded — and supplies are running out! Only 50 copies left! She knows what’s coming. In a world where true health is becoming harder to protect, there won’t always be someone there to help you when you need it most. She cares about people — and that’s why …
❤3👍3🥴1
I don’t play around. I can’t pretend to like people just because I’m sitting next to them at an event. So I told the CNN team, ‘You guys have been derelict in your duties to the American people.’ I’ll always say it. Journalists have a duty to tell the truth. Tonight we never got our dinner or the chance to hear the president speak, but we know the truth; we support him, & we know he’s safe. Thank God for that. Su…
👍27❤3⚡1💯1
I walked out right next to Jake Tapper & looked him in the eye. “How dare you? You’ve caused so much division in this country with your lies. I’m done calling it gaslighting — you’ve LIED to the American people.” These reporters have spent a decade spreading absolute lies about President Trump. They share some of the blame for what happened tonight. As a mother, I’m exhausted by it. I couldn’t stay silent and walk…
👏20💯2👍1
I wish I could say I was surprised by what happened, but the country’s mood, fueled by years of fake-news hatred, made tonight feel inevitable. I walked into the event expecting a knockout speech from the President, yet I knew the room was about 90% hostile: members of the press who despise him and have spent years inflaming those who still listen to them. Security was shockingly lax. They barely glanced at my tick…
👍10🤬6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KariLakeAZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kari Lake” (@KariLakeAZ), 2,004 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KariLakeAZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.