Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Катта Оға 🎬

Channel

Катта Оға 🎬

@KattaOgaUz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,118subscribers

-117 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001778497930
TypeChannel
Username@KattaOgaUz
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KattaOgaUz

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,1183,2353,176.56 August 2026 — 3,235 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,234 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,220 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,205 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,184 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,200 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,193 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,179 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,164 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,160 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,142 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,123 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,118 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,100–3,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:383,118-5
12 Sept 2026, 09:393,123-19
7 Sept 2026, 22:003,142-18
2 Sept 2026, 14:283,160-4
31 Aug 2026, 00:033,164-15
28 Aug 2026, 04:433,179-14
22 Aug 2026, 17:443,193-7
19 Aug 2026, 17:033,200+16
16 Aug 2026, 20:523,184-21
13 Aug 2026, 12:253,205-15
10 Aug 2026, 08:103,220-14
7 Aug 2026, 06:523,234-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:023,235first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

435 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12829.4%
😁10524.1%
👍9722.3%
🔥7116.3%
💔184.14%
❤‍🔥71.61%
👀51.15%
✍20.46%
🎉20.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 435 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KattaOgaUz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC533 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Связь" 2013 г. (Coherence) #kinoyoz2026 Баъзи фильмлар катта бюджет билан яхши ғояни қутқаришга ҳаракат қилади. "Связь" эса аксинча, катта ғоя кичик бюджетни қандай яшириши мумкинлигининг исботи. Бу фильм ҳақидаги биринчи постимни уч йил олдин ёзгандим. Унм 2023 йил 14 февраль куни, Чемпионлар лигаси ўйинидан олдин кўрган эканман. Фильм деярли битта уйда суратга олинган. Бунинг ўзи одатда режиссёр учун катта муа…

👍4❤2

4 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,140 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Каналда журналист ёки журналист танишлари борлар бўлса, юртимиз кинотеатрларининг касса натижалари ҳақида материал қилинглар. "Одиссея" ва "Ўргимчак одам" билан анча рекордлар янгиланиши керак. Балки биринчи фильмни ўзи билан янгилангандир. Сабаби, "Аватар 3"ни ҳисобга олмаганда, 2,5 йилдан бери Тошкент кинотеатрларини кузатиб келаётган одам сифатида бундай ҳолатни биринчи марта кўряпман. "Аватар 3" бир ҳафтада тахм…

👍24❤6

4 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,230 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"Ўргимчак одам: Янги кун"га "Одиссея"дагидек йиғила олмайдиган бўлдик. Чунки чипталар жуда тез тугаяпти. Бугун сотув бошланганига қарамай, "Синематика"да ўзбек тилидаги қулай сеансларга яхши жойлар деярли қолмаган. Агар кимдир бирга борамиз, деб кутган бўлса, узр, бу сафар ўхшамади.

💔18❤7👍7

4 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,280 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Яндексда мусиқа эшитиб ўтиргандим, тасодифан “Bellbottoms” чиқиб қолди. Мен каби кўпчилик бу қўшиқни биринчи марта “Малыш на драйве” (Baby Driver) интросида эшитган бўлса керак. Қўшиқни эшитишим билан ўша интро, интрони эслашим билан эса фильм ҳақидаги видео эсселар ёдимга тушди. Ютубга кириб қарасам, ўша видео эсселерга 9 йил бўлибди. Илк кўрганимда улар энди чиққан, ёки чиққанига кўпи билан бир йил бўлганди. Кейи…

❤9👍2🔥2❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,130 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Августни ҳам яхши кайфият билан бошлаб олдим. Шанба Сефдиларнинг икки фильми, якшанба эса Эггерснинг икки фильми билан ўтди. Тўрталаси ҳам жуда кучли ишланган. "Варяг" (The Northman)нинг биринчи 30 дақиқасини кўриб, "Одиссея" (The Odyssey)дан ярим юлдузни қайтариб оламан, деб ўтиргандим. Чунки иккаласи ҳам мифологияга таянади ва дастлаб Эггерснинг ёндашуви жуда кучли ва креатив кўринди. Лекин кейинроқ фильмнинг лок…

❤‍🔥3👍2❤1

2 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC≈1,190 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Шу икки актёрни кўрсам бир хил вайб ҳис қиламан нимагадир.

😁62🔥9👀4❤2

31 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,770 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ҳештег билан қидирсам, ҳамма тақризлар чиқмаяпти. Агар ёзганлар бўлса, изоҳда ҳавола қолдиринглар. Бирга ўқиб чиқамиз.

🔥7❤‍🔥2🎉2✍1❤1

31 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC≈1,670 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Қандай қилиб ҳамма керак бўладиган тараканга айланиш мумкин? "Стрингер" 2013 г. (Nightcrawler) #kinoyoz2026 #таҳлил Фильмни кўрганимга 8–9 йил бўлди, шекилли. Мактаб пайти торрентдан юклаб кўрганим эсимда. Ўшанда Лу менга студиядаги бошловчилар ёки турли мотивацион тренинг ўтказадиган одамларга ўхшаб кўринганди. Орадан анча йил ўтиб фильмни қайта кўрганимда эса худди баъзи HR ёки бирга ишлаган одамларимни кўрганде…

❤13👍5🔥4✍1❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,510 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кадрни катталаштириш ёки сиқиш? #таҳлил Менимча, Кристофер Нолан ва Роберт Эггерс кино технологиясига энг жиддий қарайдиган режиссёрлардан. Лекин уларнинг бу борадаги ёндашуви деярли бир-бирига тескари. Нолан доим кино технологиясининг энг юқори нуқтасини қидиради. У энг катта форматлар, энг юқори аниқлик ва энг реал тасвир орқали томошабинни фильм ичига киритишга ҳаракат қилади. Масалан, "Опенгеймер" ва "Одиссея"…

👍8❤6

29 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC≈1,570 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ва биласизми, энг ачинарлиси нимада? Кеча яна бир нозик деталь кўриб қолдим. Университет комиссияси Маркни жавобгарликка тортган саҳнада, аъзолардан бири уларнинг тизими мукаммал ва хавфсиз эканини, шунинг учун Маркни атиги 4 соатда топишганини айтади. Марк эса ажабланиб жавоб қайтаради, агар қаерга қарашни билганингизда, коднинг алгоритми менинг деразамга ёзилганини кўрардингиз дейди. Мана шу гап аслида бизга, фил…

😁11👍2🔥2❤1

29 Jul 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,590 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бу фильм ҳақида ёзиш мен ўйлагандан қийинроқ кечди. Бир неча версия ёздим, охири шу вариантда тўхтадим. Фильмнинг тузилиши уни ҳар сафар қизиқиш билан томоша қилдиради. Лекин ҳар кўрганда ҳамма нарса тушунарлидек туюлса-да, нимадир айтилмай қолгандек бўларди. Финчер фильмлари орасида мени энг кўп ўйлантиргани ҳам шу бўлди. Одатда унинг фильмларида “нима учун?” деган саволлар томоша давомида ўз-ўзидан туғилади. Бу ф…

❤10🔥4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KattaOgaUz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ovozli kutubxona
@ovozli_kutubxona · 48,129
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Катта Оға 🎬” (@KattaOgaUz), 3,118 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KattaOgaUz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.