Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for كاوه مدنى | Kaveh Madani

Channel

كاوه مدنى | Kaveh Madani

@KavehMadani

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

11,774subscribers

-97 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001190083474
TypeChannel
Username@KavehMadani
Created4 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KavehMadani

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,77411,87111,822.56 August 2026 — 11,871 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,871 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,861 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,858 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,857 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,854 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,852 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,850 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,846 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,841 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,842 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,830 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,822 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,823 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,819 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,816 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,820 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,825 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,832 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,838 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,835 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,837 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,838 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,840 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,834 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,828 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,826 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,823 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,821 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,814 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,774 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 51 days, net -97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,759–11,886 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 19:3711,774-40
19 Sept 2026, 05:2011,814-7
16 Sept 2026, 17:3811,821-2
14 Sept 2026, 21:4011,823-3
13 Sept 2026, 07:2211,826-2
11 Sept 2026, 08:5711,828-6
8 Sept 2026, 13:5711,834-6
5 Sept 2026, 07:1511,840+2
2 Sept 2026, 05:3311,838+1
1 Sept 2026, 05:2711,837+2
31 Aug 2026, 05:3911,835-3
30 Aug 2026, 05:1711,838+6
29 Aug 2026, 03:1511,832+7
28 Aug 2026, 06:2711,825+5
27 Aug 2026, 09:0411,820+4
25 Aug 2026, 15:0411,816-3
24 Aug 2026, 11:5411,819-4
22 Aug 2026, 16:4311,823+1
21 Aug 2026, 08:3711,822-8
20 Aug 2026, 05:5211,830first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 22 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 19s
Average length
1m 26s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,414 reactions across 25 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,86654.7%
👍71020.8%
👏43112.6%
😢3008.79%
👎290.849%
😱170.498%
🎉130.381%
🔥120.351%
🤔90.264%
🤯90.264%
😁70.205%
🤩70.205%
🥰30.088%
🤬10.029%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,037 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈2,480 views106 reactionsread 2 September 2026

بحران آب از چه زمانی دیگر «بحران» نیست؟ https://t.me/KavehMadani/3332 دانوب و راین سدهای خالی انگلستان کانال پاناما مخازن ذخیره‌ای پاول و مید ایالات متحده بحر المیت و دریاچه نمک یوتا این فهرست طولانی مربوط به آب هر روز هم طولانی‌تر می‌شود. مکان‌ها‌ی این معضلات متفاوتند و آثار آنها نیز یکسان نیستند. اما همه محصول یک مشکل زیربنایی مشابه‌اند. ما اغلب مشکلات شدید آبی را «بحران»‌های موقت می‌بینیم؛ شرایطی استثنایی …

❤65👍30👏10😱1

22 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC≈2,690 views85 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📚معرفی مقاله عنوان مقاله — «ورشکستگی آبی: تعریف رسمی» سال انتشار — ۲۰۲۶ نشریه — مدیریت منابع آب 🔗 لینک دسترسی و دانلود رایگان 👇 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-025-04484-0 💧@KavehMadani

❤62👍13👏8🎉1😁1

21 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈4,540 views230 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

تو کز محنت دیگران بی‌غمی نشاید که نامت نهند آدمی 🕊️ @KavehMadani

❤198👏31😁1

19 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC≈6,080 views488 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

متشکرم از شما از همه شما که در تمام این سال‌ها کنارم بودید و همچنان هستید. هر سال در حوالی نوروز، در طی مراسمی به مناسبت «روز جهانی آب» در پاریس، نام برنده جایزه آب استکهلم اعلام می‌شود تا چند ماه بعد، در ضیافتی به میزبانی پادشاه سوئد در خلال «هفته جهانی آب»، جایزه‌ را از او دریافت کند. امسال برنده این جایزه یک ایرانی بود اما خبر زمانی اعلام شد که ایران زیر سایه جنگ، اینترنت قطع و نوروز ایرانیان عزادار جنایت دی‌ماه…

❤381👏71👍14🎉12🤩5👎2🥰2🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC≈4,920 views52 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔫آیا نظریه بازی می تواند کمکی به حل مناقشات خزر نماید؟ https://bit.ly/2MF4hWE لینک مقاله انگلیسی در نشریه Earth👆 https://t.me/KavehMadani/641 لینک ترجمه مقاله (نشریه دانشمنامه)👆 ⚖️@KavehMadani

👏32❤16🤔2😁2

7 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈4,640 views76 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

سیستم پشتیبان مذاکرات #دریای_خزر چگونه کار می کند؟ 🔴یک مسأله مهم در مناقشه خزر رابطه پیچیده سهم از مساحت دریا با ارزش اقتصادی منابع دریاست که اغلب مورد توجه نبوده است. ⚖ @KavehMadani

👍62👏6❤5👎3

7 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈4,140 views87 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

همه از سهم ایران از سطح و کف #دریای_خزر صحبت می کنند، اما نباید فراموش کرد که دلیل اصلی دعوای خزر، منابع هنگفت انرژی آن است. #خطای_استراتژیک 💵 @KavehMadani

👍70❤12👏3👎2

7 Aug 2026, 02:22 UTC≈3,840 views74 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

⁉️ اهمیت نحوه توزیع جغرافیایی منابع نفت و گاز کف دریا در مناقشات خزر 📝 مقاله نشریه Earth در مورد مدل پشتیبان مذاکرات #دریای_خزر به همراه ترجمه نشریه دانشنامه 📚@KavehMadani

❤48👏14👍7👎2😢2🔥1

28 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC≈6,890 views107 reactionsread 2 September 2026

⭕️ در خلال هفته اقلیم لندن، بر اساس گزارش اخیر موسسه آب، محیط زیست و سلامت دانشگاه سازمان ملل درباره ردپای کربنی، آبی و زمینی (اکولوژیک) هوش مصنوعی، دبیرکل سازمان ملل متحد از شرکت‌های هوش مصنوعی خواست که این ردپاها را به صورت شفاف گزارش دهند و متعهد شوند که تا سال ۲۰۳۰ همه انرژی مورد نیاز این صنعت را از منابع تجدید پذیر تامین کنند. اطلاعات بیشتر درباره «ابتکار شفافیت محیط زیستی هوش مصنوعی» دبیرکل سازمان ملل: 🔗 https…

👍59❤32👏15🤔1

13 Jun 2026, 13:37 UTC≈8,230 views98 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

گفت‌و‌گوی تلویزیونی رئیس موسسه آب، محیط زیست و سلامت دانشگاه سازمان ملل متحد درباره هوش مصنوعی، آثار زیان‌بار محیط زیستی، استخراج منابع معدنی حیاتی و روش جدید استعمار در قرن بیست و یکم 🔗 https://youtu.be/oZ-oc_7GRKE 🚨 @KavehMadani

❤61👏36👎1

7 Jun 2026, 15:45 UTC≈8,980 views88 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ترجمه گفت‌‌وگوی کاوه مدنی با سی ان ان درباره اثرات محیط زیستی‌ هوش مصنوعی 🔗 https://ensafnews.com/646528/دوئل-سیانان-میان-سام-آلتمن-و-کاوه-مد/ 🫆 @KavehMadani

❤50👏29👍8👎1

7 Jun 2026, 05:52 UTC≈6,940 views76 reactionsread 2 September 2026

گفت‌و‌گوی کاوه مدنی با سی‌ان‌ان درباره یافته‌های‌ گزارش جدید دانشگاه سازمان ملل درباره اثرات محیط زیستی هوشواره و مراکز داده 🔗 https://youtu.be/O6JHLqlCPuM 📺 @KavehMadani

👍32❤25👏14👎4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @KavehMadani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@KavehMadani edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Kaveh Madani (en.wikipedia.org)
“…{{unbulleted list|[https://www.kavehmadani.com/ KavehMadani.com]|[https://t.me/KavehMadani @KavehMadani]}} }} '''Kaveh Madani''' ({{langx|fa|کاوه مدنی }};…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“كاوه مدنى | Kaveh Madani” (@KavehMadani), 11,774 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KavehMadani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.