Gaming โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net +933. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 2,910โ4,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 04:41
3,983
+33
12 Sept 2026, 16:16
3,950
+62
8 Sept 2026, 17:19
3,888
+107
3 Sept 2026, 01:49
3,781
+54
30 Aug 2026, 18:16
3,727
+98
28 Aug 2026, 02:46
3,629
+52
24 Aug 2026, 19:45
3,577
+115
20 Aug 2026, 21:02
3,462
+102
17 Aug 2026, 12:47
3,360
+102
14 Aug 2026, 08:47
3,258
+118
11 Aug 2026, 05:24
3,140
+83
8 Aug 2026, 00:47
3,057
+7
7 Aug 2026, 14:46
3,050
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 30 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
111 reactions across 29 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
๐คฃ
50
45.0%
โค
44
39.6%
๐ฅ
9
8.11%
๐
3
2.70%
๐
2
1.80%
๐ญ
1
0.901%
๐
1
0.901%
๐
1
0.901%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Keno1033144. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Keno1033144 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@kenofile named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 โ 8 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@pmkonlychannelmyanmar named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 โ 8 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 21 August 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ต๐ถ ๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐ถ๐ต ๐บ๐ฏ๐จ๐น๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ ๐ด๐๐จ๐ต๐ด๐จ๐นโ (@Keno1033144), 3,983 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Keno1033144.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
