Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نچندان فوری(میم)

Channel

نچندان فوری(میم)

@KhabarForixs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,796subscribers

+1,678 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003510394278
TypeChannel
Username@KhabarForixs
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KhabarForixs

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,11813,33812,2287 August 2026 — 11,118 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,187 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,163 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,172 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,192 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,195 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,204 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,253 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,225 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,243 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,238 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,263 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,250 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,251 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,252 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,251 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,246 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,230 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,208 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,179 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,154 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,214 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,251 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,275 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,338 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,314 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,233 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,143 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,030 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,905 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,796 subscribers12,7967 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,678. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,785–13,671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:0012,796-109
16 Sept 2026, 11:3712,905-125
14 Sept 2026, 18:5813,030-113
13 Sept 2026, 03:1913,143-90
11 Sept 2026, 03:1813,233-81
8 Sept 2026, 07:5613,314-24
5 Sept 2026, 00:5913,338+63
3 Sept 2026, 09:1613,275+24
2 Sept 2026, 03:2313,251+37
1 Sept 2026, 03:0313,214+60
31 Aug 2026, 00:0713,154-25
29 Aug 2026, 20:4313,179-29
28 Aug 2026, 19:1213,208-22
27 Aug 2026, 19:5813,230-16
26 Aug 2026, 22:2413,246-5
25 Aug 2026, 23:3213,251-1
24 Aug 2026, 22:3813,252+1
23 Aug 2026, 06:4513,251+1
21 Aug 2026, 16:1713,250-13
20 Aug 2026, 13:5213,263first reading

Engagement

703 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.66%
avg views ÷ 12,796 subscribers
Avg views / post
852
317 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
317
of 703 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held703 (7 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total270,185
Reactions total21,001
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50m 40s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

43,595 reactions across 702 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣37,50886.0%
👍2,9336.73%
1,5503.56%
🔥9122.09%
🤬3250.745%
👎2040.468%
😁1630.374%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 702 of the 703 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43,595 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 703 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
132
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 703 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
78
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KhabarForixs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 703 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC182 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

خب کار امروز ما تموم شد شب خوش دوستان @khabarforixs ACE

🤣21🔥2😁1

2 Sept 2026, 20:01 UTC333 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

حتی با سانسور بسیار شدید و گسترده در رسانه های یهودی-عربی-ترکی-عبری-اسراییلی-انگلیسی-آمریکایی از تلفات گسترده به دشمن یهودی آمریکایی عربی ,پس از حملات کونبنده شب گذشته سپاه پاسدارن , مجموعه تصاویر اختصاصی از طرف مخلصان ولایت ساکن در خارج از خاک ولایت به دست مارسید !!! به افتخار نیروهای مسلحمون یه ری اکت قلب و یه اموجی مرغ فراموش نشه @khabarforixs ACE

🤣303😁1

2 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC613 views58 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

آقای دکتر علی کریمی هر 5 دقیقه با یه آدم رندوم @khabarforixs ACE

🤣571

2 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,030 views93 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

الله اکبر الله اکبر خبر موثقه دوستان ACE

🤣93

2 Sept 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,050 views81 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

شرجی-نمک دریا : 1 آل علی : 0 ACE

🤣801

2 Sept 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,070 views81 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

ناو آبراهام لینکص , ناوی که تا امروز عرزشی ها بیش از 26 بار غرقش کردن بعد از 286 روز عملیات بی وقفه بر روی دریا و ثبت رکوردی جدید برای نیروی دریایی مدرن آمریکا در تایلند پهلو گرفت لازم ذکر است احتمالا هدف از انتخاب تایلند برای پهلو گیری سلیقه مشترک فرمانده ناو و ادمین ACE میباشد پ.ن : بزرگترین مرکز تولید فموبی در جهان تایلند میباشید ACE

🤣77😁3👍1

2 Sept 2026, 15:35 UTC973 views86 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

شهادت مبارکتون🖤 غمتون پرتکرار 🤤🤤🫟💦 چه جوونای رعنایی 💦 #وعده_دروغ۳ X

🤣82🔥2😁2

2 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC976 views67 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐 X

🤣661

2 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC965 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

مراعات کن کصخولیما💦🤤💦🤤💦🤤 #جادوگریما X

🤣381

2 Sept 2026, 14:51 UTC972 views82 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

آقا بین اینهمه خبر ، یه ورزشیمون بشه دیگه 🤤 امروز در دیدار کصپایان دو قطبی لیگ #عنتر ایران , دربی تهران رو در اصفهان داریم💦💦 به نظرتون کدوم تیم کصپا می‌بره؟ X

🤣78😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 703 posts we hold for @KhabarForixs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@KhabarForixs edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTCAnonymous Poll335 voters

نظر شما در مورد شاهزاده رضا پهلوی و عملکرد ایشون در رهبری عمده مخالفین جمهوری اسلامی تحت عنوان اپوزیسیون چیست !؟ ACE

  1. بسیاری راضی هستم21%
  2. اصلا راضی نیستم7%
  3. از نظر تئوری سیاسی، لیبرال و قابل‌قبول است؛ اما برای رهبری انقلاب، خیر.10%
  4. در حال حرکت در مسیر درست هستند18%
  5. به رهبری رضا پهلوی هیچ اعتقادی ندارم و او را فاقد توان رهبری مؤثر انقلاب می‌دانم.10%
  6. مخالفت با رضا پهلوی یعنی همراهی با جمهوری اسلامی34%
  7. به‌عنوان نقطه همگرایی مخالفان قابل‌پذیرش است، اما در اجرا، سازماندهی و رهبری ضعف‌های جدی دارد.48%

The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTCAnonymous Poll113 voters

نظر شما درمورد آموزش زبان زبان مادری در مدارس چیست !؟ ACE (درصورت علاقه به اشاره به موارد تکمیلی در قسمت کامنت ها تبادل نظر کنید)

  1. حق مسلم و بی بدیل میباشد31%
  2. موجبات مشکلات فرهنگی است و نباید انجام شود13%
  3. با تحقیق در مورد مدل های مشابه اجرا شده و الهام از موارد موجود بلامانع است16%
  4. به شکل واحد اختیاری از سنی مشخص پس از آموزش زبان ملی بلامانع است40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTCAnonymous Poll234 voters

نظرتون راجب حکم اعدام چی هست !؟

  1. باید برقرار باشه و برای کنترل جامعه لازمه11%
  2. حکمی غیرانسانی و ناکارآمد هست13%
  3. بسته به جرم باید نظر داد62%
  4. هر شکلی از اعدام به علت هر جرمی ممنوع غیرانسانی است باید از قوانین حذف و با حبس بلند مدت جایگزین شود28%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTCAnonymous Poll63 voters

به یاد کودکان کص کش فلسطینی عکس شام بزارم از این به بعد !؟

  1. بزار79%
  2. نزار24%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 703 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نچندان فوری(میم)” (@KhabarForixs), 12,796 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KhabarForixs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.