Channel
@KimGaveul
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002207826294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KimGaveul |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KimGaveul |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:39 | 2 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 2 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
26 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 57.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 19.2% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 23 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💎💎💎💎💎💎💎➕ ✨The sun never sets on a Queen's reign. Dust settles, but icons shine forever. Riding into town with their REVIVE+ album and the catchy title track called Blackhole, IVE owns every dusty trail like a neon-lit runway. They aren't just wearing crowns but they're the new law of the horizon, dripping in sweet-but-sharp charm with a gaze sharper than any silver spur. This is a stylish showdown of elegance and p…
❤15🔥5🆒4👀2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Hidden member Eusebia Lune @haeuma Deo Vsevolod @Suengchan Romen Ash @Cihengxuan King Miye @RudeDoll Hiro @Beomzgyu Maddy Cross @Mpenarik Taajh @Chdengxun Marchall @Zongu
Sticker, posted without a caption
Leeseo Wyssie Rou @Xiantrui Ceysha Valentine @wleeseo Keia Klane @Lixyanrui Sechilla Gwyn @lreeseo Bloom Injor @Laeeseo Gemara Aushery @gadiiskeciII Catherine Amyshanne @jiwzochoi Luz Marela @leeseoe Catscia Melody @xianruilis Claire Amy @lleeseo Maryava Judith @XIlANRUI Aimisha Cayne @eeyseo Chastine @hLeeseo Aurellie Cheryl @gtemass Catheila Bellevoire @LeeseoLee Kitsche Lush @dcear Jecca Alts @lonqlashes Meidina …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Liz Kim Lizie Amourthy @qlizkim Yishayla Bloom @lizkimu Eirlys Everdeen @llizkim Noraah @kiamliz Novalisse Divione @lizkmm Genieve Twila @lizkivm Cheyriè Ophelia @LizKizm
Sticker, posted without a caption
Jang Wonyoung Myrieth Angié @WVONY Rosy Vanelle @dottedrosie Vivienne Wynth @vijcky Cata Niñez @gFayn Nona Venya @Wonvyoung Aurèlynn Vaclavik @wovnyo Chelsea Gee @Wyonyoung Minesha Primroses @lpollipop Clairette de Jongh @jangvirky Kahana Nakerta @Yluanying Aurora Cosette @Yuanyinw Catlish Mewl @Wfonyo Seichie Netheils @nyopung Angelina Marié @wonyougg Callaly Kithcye @Yuannying Eulalie Pear @yuanyixg Aruné Namorine…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Naoi Rei Madelaine Caistarla @naoiyei Clovey Aimee @reiyomi Rué Nyxie @naaoirei Nichie Reiya @naoryrei Citrine Seraphina @Naoi3Rei Ahraz @reiinaoi Eunice Tatcher @wnaoi Violet Eisley @jingqlei Tsueiryu Miseka @NanoiRei
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @KimGaveul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@KimGaveul named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ela's Backroom.” (@KimGaveul), 2 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KimGaveul.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.