Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ę˜†ę˜ŽšŸµčŒ¶é¦†

Supergroup

ę˜†ę˜ŽšŸµčŒ¶é¦†

@KmSpa666999

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic Ā· Growth Ā· Engagement Ā· Citations Ā· Cite this entry

3,782members

+1,559 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

315 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register Ā· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003946413177
TypeSupergroup
Username@KmSpa666999
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 September 2026
Last confirmed live23 October 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/KmSpa666999

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2234,6413,43224 August 2026 — 2,223 members25 August 2026 — 2,224 members28 August 2026 — 3,739 members31 August 2026 — 3,732 members3 September 2026 — 3,736 members6 September 2026 — 3,736 members8 September 2026 — 3,738 members12 September 2026 — 3,823 members16 September 2026 — 4,641 members24 September 2026 — 4,517 members4 October 2026 — 4,438 members10 October 2026 — 4,318 members14 October 2026 — 4,194 members17 October 2026 — 4,081 members20 October 2026 — 3,954 members23 October 2026 — 3,782 members3,78224 August 202623 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 60 days, net +1,559. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean ā€œno change observedā€, never ā€œinterpolatedā€. The vertical axis spans 1,860–5,004 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
23 Oct 2026, 13:503,782-172
20 Oct 2026, 11:463,954-127
17 Oct 2026, 07:094,081-113
14 Oct 2026, 10:094,194-124
10 Oct 2026, 16:204,318-120
4 Oct 2026, 17:594,438-79
24 Sept 2026, 22:394,517-124
16 Sept 2026, 19:384,641+818
12 Sept 2026, 16:163,823+85
8 Sept 2026, 19:353,738+2
6 Sept 2026, 23:103,736no change
3 Sept 2026, 10:153,736+4
31 Aug 2026, 12:043,732-7
28 Aug 2026, 09:533,739+1,515
25 Aug 2026, 03:592,224+1
24 Aug 2026, 18:002,223first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the ā€œNamed by N registered channelsā€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

ā€œę˜†ę˜ŽšŸµčŒ¶é¦†ā€ (@KmSpa666999), 3,782 members as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KmSpa666999.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Ā· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.