Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KotiaForge

Channel

KotiaForge

@Kotiaforge

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,022subscribers

+138 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001330740222
TypeChannel
Username@Kotiaforge
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kotiaforge

Growth

4,8845,0224,9537 August 2026 — 4,884 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,885 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,899 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,960 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,983 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,995 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,002 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,015 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,019 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,020 subscribers5 September 2026 — 5,022 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +138. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,863–5,043 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 20:395,022+2
2 Sept 2026, 00:075,020+1
30 Aug 2026, 06:455,019+4
27 Aug 2026, 16:335,015+13
24 Aug 2026, 09:575,002+7
20 Aug 2026, 18:244,995+12
17 Aug 2026, 22:364,983+23
14 Aug 2026, 18:474,960+61
11 Aug 2026, 00:384,899+14
7 Aug 2026, 19:434,885+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:464,884first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 5,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
1 post measured
Reaction rate
13.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (26 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,470
Reactions total200
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,778 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,00334.7%
🔥1,34323.2%
1,31822.8%
💯78813.6%
👍2424.19%
😢350.606%
😱170.294%
🤩120.208%
100.173%
🗿40.069%
🤔30.052%
🐳10.017%
👌10.017%
😡10.017%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,778 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈1,470 views200 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Это картинки жирной графикой, чтобы можно было печать на пленочке

👍95😁46🔥4118

Signed Екатерина Богданова

10 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,920 views323 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥193😁6335👍14💯9😢63

Signed Екатерина Богданова

10 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈5,780 views468 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁247💯146🔥4431

Signed Екатерина Богданова

9 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC≈2,300 views261 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ща скоро к интернетам вылуплюсь

😁171🔥5733

Signed Екатерина Богданова

5 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈3,740 views273 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Август)

🔥14786😁19👍18😢3

Signed Екатерина Богданова

4 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈7,280 views480 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Один из сааамых первых комиксов с кошаками За 28 июля 2020 года

284🔥101😁67👍20🤩7😡1

Signed Екатерина Богданова

1 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈4,700 views264 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Отдельно

🔥17953👍19😱8🗿4😁1

Signed Екатерина Богданова

1 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC≈4,270 views273 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯135😁68🔥3619👍9😢6

Signed Екатерина Богданова

31 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC≈4,060 views326 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁23846🔥28💯9👍5

Signed Екатерина Богданова

31 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC≈3,940 views364 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Степана давно не зрели (он бы нас еще дольше не зрел) Это токсичный Степан, его выгнали в хранилище токсичных отходов

😁22791🔥415

Signed Екатерина Богданова

29 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC≈3,840 views187 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💯94🔥56👍1712😁8

Signed Екатерина Богданова

29 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC≈4,620 views346 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯210🔥56😁4223😢8👍4🤔3

Signed Екатерина Богданова

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Kotiaforge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KotiaForge” (@Kotiaforge), 5,022 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kotiaforge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.