Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قطوف سلفيّة

Channel

قطوف سلفيّة

@Kotoofsalafia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,406subscribers

-170 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291092543
TypeChannel
Username@Kotoofsalafia
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kotoofsalafia

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,40614,57614,4916 August 2026 — 14,576 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,576 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,572 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,568 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,553 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,545 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,542 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,533 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,522 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,515 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,509 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,506 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,500 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,498 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,497 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,492 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,485 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,479 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,484 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,490 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,489 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,481 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,477 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,472 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,473 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,468 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,458 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,453 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,445 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,434 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,428 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,426 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,418 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,406 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,381–14,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:5514,406-12
16 Sept 2026, 21:3614,418-8
15 Sept 2026, 02:1814,426-2
13 Sept 2026, 08:2114,428-6
11 Sept 2026, 08:1914,434-11
8 Sept 2026, 11:1814,445-8
5 Sept 2026, 02:1714,453-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:3514,458-10
2 Sept 2026, 00:5814,468-5
1 Sept 2026, 02:0414,473+1
31 Aug 2026, 03:3614,472-5
30 Aug 2026, 02:4514,477-4
29 Aug 2026, 00:2514,481-8
27 Aug 2026, 23:5714,489-1
26 Aug 2026, 23:0214,490+6
25 Aug 2026, 22:1814,484+5
24 Aug 2026, 20:0614,479-6
23 Aug 2026, 03:5414,485-7
21 Aug 2026, 16:5714,492-5
20 Aug 2026, 18:2814,497first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 14,406 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,520
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held42 (25 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total13,711
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC378 viewsread 2 September 2026

"(مُحكم ‏الود، ومتشابه الزلل). من الخلل في الموازنات وتقييم العلاقات أن ترى عشرات المواقف التي تدل على المحبة وموقفا واحدا يحتمل الإساءة، فتقدم محتمل الإساءة على ما ثبت بيقين الودّ، وكان الأولى بك أن تحتمل صريح الإساءة إكرامًا لسابق العهد؛ "وإذا كانت التوبة تجب ما قبلها من الذنوب، فالفضل يشفع لما بعده من العثرات". ومما يُروى عن عمر بن الخطاب -رضي الله عنه- أنه قال: (لا يحل لامرئٍ مسلم سمع من أخيه كلمة أن يظن بها سوء

1 Sept 2026, 13:56 UTC833 viewsread 2 September 2026

"وقد اتفق العقلاء أن نيلَ المطلوب لا يُنالُ إلا بقدرٍ من الجهد، فإنه من عرفَ ما يطلبُ هانَ عليه ما يبذُل، ومن سعى إلى كمالٍ ممكنٍ من غير معرفةٍ لخطوات الأقدام تعثّر في منتصفِ الطريق؛ ومن سامحت نفسُه الأيام غلبته وعثاءُ الأزمان؛ ولكل سائرٍ مقصود، ولكل مقصود وسيلة؛ ولكل وسيلة نظرٌ وبصيرة؛ فمن لم يدرك من نفسه البصائر تعامت دونه الذخائر! تَهونُ عَلَينا في المَعالي نُفوسُنا وَمَن خَطَبَ الحَسناءَ لَم يُغلِها المَهرُ"

31 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 2 September 2026

"(رحماتٌ في طيّ التأخير). من أعظم الآفات التي تنخر في طمأنينة الإنسان، وتفسد عليه بهجة يومه؛ آفة المقارنة الزمنية، وهي شعور ينتاب الإنسان حين يرقب قطارات الآخرين تتحرك سريعة، بينما يقف قطاره على رصيف الانتظار، فيداخله الأسى، وربما تسلل إليه وهم الحرمان. ولو نظر بعين البصيرة لرأى أن الله فضّله على كثير من خلقه في أمور كثيرة لا تحصى، قدمها له وأخرها عنهم، ولكن الإنسان بطبعه كنود، يعدد المصائب وينسى النعم، يقف على قار

31 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 2 September 2026

"من تمام العقلِ -حين ينظر الناظر في أقوال الناس وأفكارهم- التنبّه إلى الأسباب والمحامل التي دعتهم إلى اعتناق آرائهم؛ فإنّ ذلك ممّا يورثه الحكمةَ والرّحمةَ؛ إذ ليس من عرف أسباب المقالة كمن وقف عند ظاهرها." قال ابن تيميّة: «فإنّ من عرف حقائق أقوال الناس وطرقهم التي دعتهم إلى تلك الأقوال؛ حصل له العلمُ والرّحمةُ، فعلم الحقَّ، ورحم الخلقَ، وكان مع الذين أنعم الله عليهم من النبيين والصديقين والشهداء والصالحين، وهذه خاصّة

30 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 2 September 2026

"فقد يرى الإنسانُ الطريقَ واضحًا، ثم لا يبلغه؛ لأنّ السيرَ إلى المقاصد ليس بالقوّة وحدها، بل بمعونةٍ خفيّةٍ من الله. لذا قال الرافعي: «وكلُّ سهلٍ، إذا لم يُوفَّقِ اللهُ، صعبُ.»"

28 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC≈2,110 viewsread 2 September 2026

"لا أغبط أحدًا على نعيمٍ كغبطتي أصحاب الدعاء المُتواصل؛ لصدق عبوديتهم وأدبهم العظيم مع الله. تراهم يستقبلون أقداره تعالى بحفاوة، ويلحّون في الدعاء مهما تأخّرت الإجابة. لهم قلوبٌ واثقةٌ بالله؛ لا شيء يهزمها، ولا يأس يحاصرها.. بيقينهم، يستلذّون طول المناجاة، ويتحسّسون الفرج قبل أوانه . وهُم مأجورون فائزون في كل أحوالهم؛ فدعاؤهم إمّا مُجاب، أو مُدَّخر ، أو مدفوعٌ به عنهم من الأذى!"

26 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈2,710 viewsread 2 September 2026

"يأتِ بها الله حتى وإن انقطعت الأسباب، حتى وإن ضاقت السُبل، يأتِ بها الله رغمًا عن الظروف وعن كل عائق وعن كل شيء، يأتِ بها الله لأنه القادر الذي بيده تدبير كل أمر، ولا يعجزه شيء في الأرض ولا في السماء!"

25 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,950 viewsread 2 September 2026

"لا تُغفِل تلك اللحظات التي تُعِيدك إلى ذاتك، التي تريك الحياة كما هي بلا ألوان أو بريق زائف، التي تجعلك تُفكّر بالمعنى والهدف والغاية، وتُرتّب بعدها أولويّاتك واهتماماتك، فمثل هذه اللحظات تُعِيد ولادة الإنسان إلى الحياة من جديد."

24 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈3,220 viewsread 2 September 2026

"يكيد الإنسان لغيره بقدر ما فيه من علل داخلية، فمن امتلأ قلبه سلامًا، ضاق فيه موضع الأذى، ومن أنهكه النقص، أمضى عمره يطعن في الآخرين، كثير من الإساءة ليست وصفًا لمن وجهت إليه، بقدر ما هي مرآة لما يسكن صاحبها من خراب."

22 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC≈3,610 viewsread 2 September 2026

عشوائيات المقاطع القصيرة وظلام القلب ! " قد تقوم كثرة رؤية المنكرات مقام ارتكابها في سلب القلب نور التمييز والإنكار؛ لأن المنكرات إذا كثر على القلب ورودها، وتكرر في العين شهودها، ذهبت عظمتها من القلوب شيئًا فشيئا، إلى أن يراها الإنسان فلا تخطر بباله أنها منكرات، ولا يميز بفكره أنها معاصي". تنبيه الغافلين | ابن النحاس

22 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈3,470 viewsread 2 September 2026

"قاعدة عظيمة في التعامل مع الناس «وَلَا تَبْخَسُوا النَّاسَ أَشْيَاءَهُمْ» تأمَّل اتساع كلمة: «أشياءهم»، لم يقل أموالهم فقط؛ بل أشياءهم. فلا تبخس إنسانًا جهده، ولا موهبته، ولا فكرته، ولا مكانته، ولا معروفًا قدّمه، ولا نجاحًا استحقه. ومن البخس أن يصنع أحدهم شيئًا جميلًا فتبحث عن نقصه، وأن يحسن فتتجاهل إحسانه، وأن ينجح فتردّ نجاحه إلى الحظ، وأن يعتذر فتستكثر عليه فضيلة الرجوع، فبعض الناس لا يسرق منك مالًا؛ لكنه يسرق من

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @Kotoofsalafia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

•• مُلْتَقَى النّساء السّلفيات 🌷
@moultaqua_alsalafiyat · 64,903
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
أُسَيْد..🍂
@usayd_98 · 135,258
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
مَناراتُ الـعُلا 🕊🍃
@manarat_alola · 72,897
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
فتاوى الشيخ صالح الفوزان حفظه اللّه
@alfawzan12 · 31,631
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
روتين التسعين
@Msaf_h1 · 103,163
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
المكتبة الذهبية
@PDFnew · 50,661
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قطوف سلفيّة” (@Kotoofsalafia), 14,406 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kotoofsalafia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.