Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IVAN | CLOSE

Channel

IVAN | CLOSE

@Kumisivan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

727subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002042174441
TypeChannel
Username@Kumisivan
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kumisivan

Growth

7277337308 August 2026 — 731 subscribers9 August 2026 — 730 subscribers15 August 2026 — 733 subscribers23 August 2026 — 730 subscribers30 August 2026 — 727 subscribers8 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 726–734 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 10:44727-3
23 Aug 2026, 23:26730-3
15 Aug 2026, 19:22733+3
9 Aug 2026, 02:52730-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:18731first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026

And yea, like in this illustration, those male leads have quite a unique taste

7 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026

And it backfire, those male leads fall for Cedric instead.

7 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026

And the cupid male lead is about Cedric trying to set up the female lead to get her male leads back, pretending to hate Eadwina and team up with the female lead

7 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026

And he also can talk to the author (me) through the narration, if you read the real novel we kinda bicker a bit about the story

7 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026

Oh also, Cedric is kinda different from Eadwina. Eadwina didn't get those windows pop outs like in the novel, she's genuinely just got transmigrated and that's all he got, he didn't get a guide or restrictions Meanwhile Cedric got windows pop out and restrictions to not be out of character or he'll get a penalty, also, he's conscious that another story is forming because of his existence, he actually can communicate

7 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026

Eadwina changes the story so much or it's the Saintness novel that's actually made up ...?

7 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026

The pirate who's supposed to be hard to get changed into someone who's all flirty and like a typical bad boy

7 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026

The wizard is described as a pathetic kid, he's supposed to be those kind of shy male leads and younger male leads that's actually bold But no he's really FLAT, he shows NO EXPRESSION, and his expressions are scary when it comes to his experiments

7 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026

The Northern duke was supposed to be really evil, cold, like a wolf but no he looks more like a big black cat who has sadistic tendencies that he tried so hard to hold back

7 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026

His voice is supposed to be deep, but he speaks so softly and makes you feel calm in conversation

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Kumisivan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IVAN | CLOSE” (@Kumisivan), 727 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kumisivan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.