新版可能要逾期了😭
🤣7🖕3

Channel
@LANZHOUKPM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
383subscribers
+213 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003935240251 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LANZHOUKPM |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 24 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LANZHOUKPM |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 383 | +24 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 359 | +31 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 328 | +31 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 297 | +98 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 199 | +29 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 170 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 170 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
78 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 42 | 53.8% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 14.1% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 11.5% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 8.97% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 5.13% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
新版可能要逾期了😭
🤣7🖕3
今晚9点准时更新
关于破解版还有那些造谣抹黑的一些事: 1.首先呢我先回应一下,那个二次收费是那个傻逼管理乱搞 我本人是不知情的 目前那些想要补卡的我都让他们直接找我 并且有些人找不到原卡密 我都是直接发新卡的 我在一个月前还给了你们自助解绑网站 2.关于那些破解版呢,我想说的是咱们能不用就不用 尊重一下原作者的著作权 某些人往里面塞了什么恶意代码我就不说了 关于某人说我圈钱 圈钱指的是什么呢?无任何意义的软件/二改/收费过高 但进群早一点的人应该知道 我进行过2次降价 蓝昼是完全会听取用户的合理意见的 包括前天有些人提出来的一些功能的要求我也尽量去满足了 有些学生蛋买不起我也送了他们永久卡(蓝昼是个人开发团队 没那么多精力) 破解版我不会再咋管了(你有破解的实力 但没有让用户们信任你的能力 也没有大面积泛滥的能力) 说好听点呢 那不就是变向给我引流吗😁👍👍 3.本人对于造谣等秉持0容忍态度 如果你觉得我有任何违法违规行为 请call 110 我…
👍1
LANZHOUKPM pinned «大爱仙尊古月方源亲自认证ROOT机 完美环境+神秘调度+踹死三角洲检测 价格优良 可自定义选择 设备多 采机侠签约主播 扩展业务↙ 接CPU维修 屏幕更换 后盖更换 电池更换 远程root 远程环境 远程9008救砖 主板维修 联系方式↙ QQ:3979934967 KS:pl20130111»
大爱仙尊古月方源亲自认证ROOT机 完美环境+神秘调度+踹死三角洲检测 价格优良 可自定义选择 设备多 采机侠签约主播 扩展业务↙ 接CPU维修 屏幕更换 后盖更换 电池更换 远程root 远程环境 远程9008救砖 主板维修 联系方式↙ QQ:3979934967 KS:pl20130111
LANZHOUKPM pinned Deleted message
LANZHOUKPM pinned a file
都给我把破解狗宋晓东甩起来玩
File, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
解压密码
🥰5🤡3
lanzhouniubi
🥰4🤡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LANZHOUKPM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LANZHOUKPM” (@LANZHOUKPM), 383 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LANZHOUKPM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.