Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ـ لَهَف كاتب .

Channel

ـ لَهَف كاتب .

@LHAFI

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,768subscribers

+4,256 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004302064000
TypeChannel
Username@LHAFI
Descriptionبينَ نَفَسٍ ونَفْسٍ؛ نَفَسٌ يُبقيني، ونَفْسٌ تُرهقني. @LAHFIBOT
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 8 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/LHAFI

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

1,5125,7683,64025 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,639 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,841 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,970 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,681 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,545 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,445 subscribers19 September 2026 — 4,789 subscribers29 September 2026 — 5,057 subscribers6 October 2026 — 5,230 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,238 subscribers16 October 2026 — 5,336 subscribers19 October 2026 — 5,542 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,538 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,532 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,659 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,768 subscribers25 August 202631 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 67 days, net +4,256. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 874–6,406 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 23:555,768+109
28 Oct 2026, 23:165,659+127
25 Oct 2026, 18:285,532-6
23 Oct 2026, 00:065,538-4
19 Oct 2026, 16:105,542+206
16 Oct 2026, 09:165,336+98
13 Oct 2026, 06:125,238+8
6 Oct 2026, 14:215,230+173
29 Sept 2026, 07:005,057+268
19 Sept 2026, 00:384,789+344
14 Sept 2026, 18:164,445+900
11 Sept 2026, 02:183,545+864
5 Sept 2026, 19:202,681+711
1 Sept 2026, 13:361,970+129
29 Aug 2026, 15:431,841+202
26 Aug 2026, 15:461,639+127
25 Aug 2026, 17:151,512first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 5,768 subscribers
Avg views / post
704
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held40 (8 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total12,675
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13
Videos
6
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52493294517407069732931.5%
custom 58233385035675804421617.4%
custom 53684259828709625811213.0%
custom 53663440833735699631112.0%
custom 53101856250417801421010.9%
custom 582108374881639522644.35%
custom 535933341255127040933.26%
custom 537096250465663393533.26%
custom 524229684652044889722.17%
custom 531003356601963329022.17%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 40 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LHAFI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 16:21 UTC228 views0 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026

رسالة للحياة : خُذينا بدلًا مِن مَن نُحب.

3 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC238 viewsread 4 November 2026

أخبرني، سيدي، من أين يبيعون التفاؤل؟ لأشتريَ منه قليلًا، لا لأحيا به، بل لأعرفَ بأيِّ ثمنٍ يُباع الوهم. بل أخبرني من أين يوزّعون الأوهام، لأبتاعَ لي وهمًا؛ وهمًا صغيرًا يكفيني لأصدّق أن الغدَ لن يكون نسخةً أخرى من الأمس. فقد سئمتُ الحقيقة، لا لأنها مُرّة، بل لأنها لا تترك للمرء حتى كذبةً جميلةً يتكئ عليها. ـ‌حُسام بسام.

3 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC212 viewsread 4 November 2026

هي الحياة، هل ترى؟ يُقالُ: يومٌ لك ويومٌ عليك، ولكنّي لطالما أيقنتُ أنَّ لذّةَ الأيامِ التي لي لا تمكثُ طويلًا في الذاكرة؛ تمحوها مرارةُ الأيامِ التي عليّ، حتى تصبحَ أفراحي منسيّةً، وتظلُّ خيباتي تورقُ في ذاكرتي كلّما ظننتُ أنّها ذبلت. فما أغربَ هذه الحياة! نحتاجُ إلى أيامٍ كثيرةٍ لنصنعَ ذكرى جميلة، ويكفي يومٌ واحدٌ ليفسدَ علينا استرجاعَها. يومٌ لك، ويومٌ عليك، ولكنّ الذي عليك قد يسرقُ منك حتى ما كان لك. هل ترى؟ …

2 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC243 viewsread 4 November 2026

لا تَشكُ للناسِ جُرحاً أَنتَ صاحبُهُ لا يُؤلمُ الجرحُ إلا مَنْ بِهِ أَلمُ.. شكواكَ للناسِ يا ابنَ الناسِ مَنقصةٌ ومَنْ مِن الناسِ صاحٍ ما بهِ سَقمُ؟ فالهمُ كالسيلِ والأمراضُ زاخرةٌ حُمرُ الدلائلِ مَهما أَهلُها كتموا فإنْ شكوتَ لِمنْ طابَ الزمانُ لهُ عيناكَ تغليْ ومَن تشكو لهُ صَنمُ وإذا شكوتَ لمَنْ شكواكَ تُسعدهُ أضفتَ جُرحاً لجرحكَ اسْمُهُ النّدمُ هَلِ الْمُوَاسَاةُ يَوْماً حَرَّرَتْ وَطَناً؟ أَمِ التَّعَازِيْ …

24 Oct 2026, 22:26 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 4 November 2026

أقسى الحقائق ليست التي نجهلها؛ بل التي نعرفها ونستمر في معاملتها كأنها غير موجودة.

23 Oct 2026, 20:42 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 4 November 2026

في أشخاص لو قالوا الشمس تشرق من الشرق لكذبتهم. وفي أشخاص لو قالوا الشمس تشرق من الغرب لكذبتهم كذلك. مختصر القصة : لايوجد احد صادق دائمًا.

22 Oct 2026, 15:26 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 4 November 2026

قصيدة | القتيل المقتـولْ للشاعر الكبير | أحمد مـطر بينَ بيـنْ . واقِـفٌ، والموتُ يَعـدو نَحـْوَهُ مِـنْ جِهَتينْ . فالمَدافِـعْ سَـوفَ تُرديـهِ إذا ظلَّ يُدافِعْ والمَدافِـعْ سـوفَ تُرديـهِ إذا شـاءَ التّراجُـعْ ‍ واقِـفٌ، والمَوتُ في طَرْفَـةِ عينْ. أيـنَ يمضـي ؟ المَـدى أضيَـقُ مِن كِلْمَـةِ أيـنْ ‍ ماتَ مكتـوفَ اليديـنْ . مَنحـو جُثّتَـهُ عضـويّةَ الحِـزْبِ فَناحَـت أُمُّـهُ : و احَـرَّ قلبي قَتَـلَ الحاكِـمُ طِف…

19 Oct 2026, 04:41 UTC951 viewsread 4 November 2026

هي تنظرُ إليك من البابِ الموارب، تراقبُ استهتارك، وتُحصي أعذارك، وترى كيف تُبدّد ما تبقّى من وقتك كأنّ العمرَ فائضٌ عن حاجتك. وأنت، في غفلتك، تظنُّ نظراتها تشجيعًا، وما هي إلا شفقةٌ على مَن تملكه؛ تراك قادرًا على بلوغ ما تريد، ثم تختارُ كلَّ يومٍ ألّا تخطو خطوةً واحدةً نحوه. أنت لا تُخيّب ظنَّها فحسب؛ أنت تُثبت لها، يومًا بعد يوم، أنّ أسوأ ما قد يملكه المرء عقلٌ يعرف الطريق، وإرادةٌ تأبى المسير. إنها نفسك وهيّ ترقب…

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @LHAFI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ـ لَهَف كاتب .” (@LHAFI), 5,768 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LHAFI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.