瓦妈更新扳机(通过内核实现的板机与市面常见的不同给你极致的体验),还有锁小球 绘图调节射线上下调整,还有手持图片显示、血量显示还有新英雄的绘制呀,新手枪什么的,图片文字 然后优化自瞄@全体成员
❤4👎1

Channel
@LNN0731
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-6,133 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002825982434 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GBLNB6 |
| Created | 11 June 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LNN0731 |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
@LNN0731 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 1 | -5,775 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 5,776 | -56 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 5,832 | -29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 5,861 | -36 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 5,897 | -30 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 5,927 | -52 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 5,979 | -25 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 6,004 | -23 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 6,027 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 6,049 | -22 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 6,071 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:39 | 6,083 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 6,092 | -39 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 6,131 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 6,134 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 11 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,347 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 588 | 43.7% | |
| 🥰 | 392 | 29.1% | |
| 😭 | 179 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 3.93% | |
| 👎 | 53 | 3.93% | |
| 🤡 | 46 | 3.41% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 1.41% | |
| 🖕 | 7 | 0.52% | |
| 🍌 | 6 | 0.445% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.223% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.074% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,347 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
瓦妈更新扳机(通过内核实现的板机与市面常见的不同给你极致的体验),还有锁小球 绘图调节射线上下调整,还有手持图片显示、血量显示还有新英雄的绘制呀,新手枪什么的,图片文字 然后优化自瞄@全体成员
❤4👎1
瓦妈更新适配新赛季
👎1
瓦妈反馈
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
上架wawa内部端口(支持无畏契约/和平精英) →端口介绍 ①首发灵动岛端口 ②一键开启不用配置任何东西下载即用 ③输入账号密码开启之后要等待20秒左右配置内置规则直接使用 ④首发root代模式隐藏vpn不会显示和检测 无畏契约:无视行为1.3.7无视净网封禁非拦截支持打假采用心跳包解密 原理:解密心跳包,将心跳包解密之后修改校验再重新加密,md5,crc校验全过 想抄的同行随便抄,前提是有这个能力,我可以做到空down67全杀不追10(自瞄依旧无视) 和平支持全火模式
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
反馈
1
🥰389👍53🤡46👎39❤22🤬19😭7🖕3
1
❤544👎9🍌6🖕4🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @LNN0731. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“gblnb6” (@LNN0731), 1 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LNN0731.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.