Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Theresa M Long, MD, MPH, FS

Channel

Theresa M Long, MD, MPH, FS

@LTCTheresaLong

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002410495820
TypeChannel
Username@LTCTheresaLong
DescriptionAerospace &Occupational Medicine, speciality training in Med Management of Biological & Chem Casualties. opinions do not reflect DoD or Army
Created26 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/LTCTheresaLong

Growth

161716.511 August 2026 — 16 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17 subscribers11 August 202613 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 33 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–17 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 14:2417no change
20 Aug 2026, 09:3417+1
11 Aug 2026, 18:5116first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 26 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤743.8%
😢318.8%
🤬212.5%
👎16.25%
👏16.25%
😱16.25%
🙏16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2025 to 1 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2025, 18:20 UTC89 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026

https://x.com/LTCTheresaLong/status/1928151611815215160?s=19 Do you know how many of my colleagues were telling servicemembers the vaccine was "safe and effective" but silently had not taken it themselves? One told me, "I am going to wait as long as I can and see what happens to those that take it..."

🤬2😱1

1 May 2025, 14:51 UTC117 views4 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Everyday, everyday...more text messages, phone calls and emails...people terminally ill, sudden cardiac death, stage 4 cancer, neurological devastation...and yet mRNA vaccines are STILL on the market and Fauci is still free

😢3👎1

21 Feb 2025, 18:36 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

For those asking what the award was for...let it sink in people were prepared to kick out hundreds of thousands of servicemembers...but we stopped it!! Who would benefit from the destruction of our military?

❤4👏1

21 Feb 2025, 07:13 UTC109 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Congratulations @KashPatelX thank you for your support for receiving America's Future Defender of Freedom Award!

❤3

28 Jan 2025, 01:46 UTC112 viewsread 13 September 2026

https://x.com/DS_SethRit/status/1884019322156179687?s=19 When the DoD IG fails in its mission, the cost is as grave as the wages of sin—death. This can manifest directly through the despair of a servicemember who loses faith in the system, leading to suicide (or as was nearly my fate when Officers, unaccountable due to the IG's inaction, ordered my medical detainment and near death). Or it can occur indirectly when t…

28 Jan 2025, 01:45 UTC66 viewsread 13 September 2026

https://x.com/LTCTheresaLong/status/1883924972235808793?s=19 Ted is among the tens of thousands of servicemembers who took a stand during the mandate and paid a huge price...people like him, the premature end to his career and the financial damage it caused him is not covered in the President's EO to bring back the 8,000.

28 Jan 2025, 01:45 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 13 September 2026

https://x.com/LTCTheresaLong/status/1883916332460376411?s=19 I know Reeve's son and I know what the vaccine did to him. There must be accountability for those that ordered servicemembers participate in a medical experiment, and compensation for the vaccine injured

🙏1

28 Jan 2025, 01:45 UTC58 viewsread 13 September 2026

https://x.com/LTCTheresaLong/status/1883697252998447268?s=19 "900 days of solitary confinement" WTH...pedophiles and murders dont even get treated that way in jail!

28 Jan 2025, 01:44 UTC52 viewsread 13 September 2026

https://x.com/LTCTheresaLong/status/1883696289142968565?s=19https://x.com/LTCTheresaLong/status/1883696289142968565?s=19 This is not about politics, its about healthcare, its about the truth...its about food security- that is why I want to see the man most knowledgeable about the corruption in the FDA, CDC, NIH, BigPharm and Big Agriculture in charge of HHS...rebuilding the system from the ground up!

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @LTCTheresaLong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Theresa M Long, MD, MPH, FS” (@LTCTheresaLong), 17 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LTCTheresaLong.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.