Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
19,300 average views per post against 14,988 subscribers — an engagement rate of 128.6%. Across the 24,625 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.57% and 22.2%, with a median of 11.3%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (8 August 2026 – 7 September 2026)
Posts measured
30 of 31 published in the window (1 exact, 29 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
578,162
Mature posts only
133.0% over 29 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 7 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 30 days, net +1,834. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,242–15,346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 01:22
14,988
+1,618
4 Sept 2026, 09:58
13,370
+770
3 Sept 2026, 00:32
12,600
-161
1 Sept 2026, 20:54
12,761
-13
31 Aug 2026, 23:28
12,774
-307
31 Aug 2026, 01:35
13,081
-209
29 Aug 2026, 23:07
13,290
-73
28 Aug 2026, 22:14
13,363
+470
27 Aug 2026, 18:44
12,893
-127
26 Aug 2026, 20:34
13,020
-61
25 Aug 2026, 23:01
13,081
+135
25 Aug 2026, 01:43
12,946
+57
23 Aug 2026, 15:29
12,889
-853
22 Aug 2026, 01:46
13,742
-139
20 Aug 2026, 20:43
13,881
-331
19 Aug 2026, 22:53
14,212
+226
18 Aug 2026, 20:46
13,986
-8
17 Aug 2026, 17:46
13,994
-178
16 Aug 2026, 14:53
14,172
-182
14 Aug 2026, 18:57
14,354
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
128.6%
avg views ÷ 14,988 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,300
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
52 (22 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
578,162
Reactions total
2,485
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 21:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30m 58s
Average length
1m 56s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,946 reactions across 51 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,873
37.9%
❤
1,145
23.2%
🔥
988
20.0%
👏
473
9.56%
💯
311
6.29%
🙏
77
1.56%
custom 5206527199238170614
75
1.52%
😢
2
0.04%
😍
1
0.02%
🫡
1
0.02%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,946 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 51 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LVA161. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Правовые новеллы сентября: от семейной ипотеки до защиты от мошенников
Продолжаю знакомить вас с правовыми новеллами. В этот раз пришло время сентября. Изменений действительно много — от семейной ипотеки и трудовых отношений до банковских технологий, медицины и защиты от мошенников. Остановлюсь на тех, которые непосредственно затрагивают нашу повседневную жизнь.
✅️ Семьи получают дополнительные гарантии. При рожден…
Первое сентября: от начала года — к началу начал, знаниям.
🇷🇺 Когда-то 1 сентября на Руси начинался новый год. С 1492 года в этот день отмечали Новолетие. Пётр I перенёс начало года на 1 января, но первому дню осени спустя столетия всё равно суждено было остаться особой точкой отсчёта.
Причём единой даты начала учебного года в России долго не существовало. В крестьянских семьях дети нередко приступали к учёбе после…
Большая политика сегодня все заметнее уходит на Север. Поводом еще раз внимательно посмотреть на происходящее стала статья министра иностранных дел России Сергея Лаврова о международном сотрудничестве в Арктике. На первый взгляд — это разговор о Северном морском пути, экономике и международных проектах. Но если собрать события последних лет в одну картину, становится понятно: Арктика превращается в регион, за который…
Город приближается к своему 277-му дню рождения и 195-летию со дня рождения Андрея Матвеевича Байкова.
Как и во времена легендарного городского головы, ростовские меценаты дарят городу подарки.
Так, сегодня в Парке культуры и отдыха имени М. Горького смонтирована отличная спортивная площадка. Она появилась благодаря финансовой поддержке депутата Ростовской-на-Дону городской думы В. А. Лобырева.
Теперь в главном па…
От души для людей: создал и подарил городу спортивную площадку
Спортом я занимаюсь всю жизнь и до сих пор тренируюсь семь дней в неделю. Занимаются спортом мои дети и супруга. Дочь Арина - профессиональный спортсмен-акробат. Поэтому, когда появилась возможность сделать для Ростова что-то действительно полезное, долго выбирать не пришлось: решил, что это будет хорошая современная спортивная площадка. Прямо в центре Р…
✅️ НАКАЗЫ ИЗБИРАТЕЛЕЙ ВЯЧЕСЛАВА ЛОБЫРЕВА: погорельцы дома №163 на Пушкинской
Пожар на Пушкинской произошел еще в декабре прошлого года. Огонь потушили за несколько часов, а вот последствия этой истории людям пришлось разбирать гораздо дольше.
Ко мне обратились жители пострадавшего дома – он находится на Пушкинской, 163. Здание еще в 2020 году было признано аварийным, хотя жильцы до последнего старались его сохранит…
Эксперт в области безопасности Вячеслав Лобырев: "Если на вас адресно выходит кто-либо, кто представляется сотрудником банка, правоохранительной системы, ФСБ, прокуратуры и так далее, оборвите этот разговор сразу"
В Азове Ростовской области арестовали курьера мошенников, выманивших у вдовы участника СВО более 16 млн рублей. В ГУ МВД России по Ростовской области сообщили, что обман начался со звонка злоумышленника, к…
Народный фронт передал два автомобиля для помощи жителям Харьковской области.
Для гуманитарной работы и помощи гражданскому населению Народный фронт в Ростовской области передал Военно-гражданской администрации Харьковской области два автомобиля.
Транспорт предоставили Межрегиональное территориальное управление Ространснадзора по Южному федеральному округу и Южный окружной медицинский центр ФМБА России.
Автомобили…
На заседании Ростовской-на-Дону городской Думы рассматривали вопросы, которые напрямую связаны с развитием нашего города на ближайшие годы: скорректировали бюджет, обсудили состояние дорожной инфраструктуры и результаты работы системы образования.
❗️Кроме того, актуализировали Стратегию социально-экономического развития Ростова-на-Дону до 2035 года. В обновленной редакции появились важные для донской столицы направл…
⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️
НАЧАЛО
❗️В России тысячи километров отменных дорог.
✅️ Странно описывать Россию 2026 года формулой, получившей популярность на излёте Советского Союза. За эти десятилетия изменились дороги, города, технологии строительства, инфраструктура и сама страна.
Я, как человек, который постоянно перемещается по всей России на протяжении десятков лет, прекрасно вижу, насколько сегодняшняя дорожная реальность отлич…
🇷🇺 МИФЫ О РОССИИ: ДУРАКИ И ДОРОГИ
Продолжаем развенчивать негативные мифы о России и сегодня поговорим «об извечной беде России: дураках и дорогах».
Многие жители нашей страны считают, что этой фразе несколько сот лет и мудрый классик ещё тогда(!) описал главные проблемы страны, которые её преследуют веками.
❗️Давайте разбираться.
✅️ В современный обиход фраза вошла благодаря сатирику Михаилу Задорнову, который в…
👍24💯10custom 52065271992381706147🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @LVA161. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@LVA161 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вячеслав Лобырев 🇷🇺” (@LVA161), 14,988 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LVA161.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.