ناشناس چنل http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=8976485655

Channel
𝗟𝗶𝘀𝗮 𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗺
@LalisaBloom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
-268 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003940008196 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LalisaBloom |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 6 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LalisaBloom |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 10 | -372 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 382 | +16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 366 | +48 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 318 | +15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 303 | +25 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 278 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 278 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 70.4% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 29.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨 لیسا در همان پروازی دیده شد که آن طرفدار همین الان در حال بازگشت به کره جنوبی بود.
بیانیه د بلک لیبل برای رزی اطلاعیه در مورد هنرمند رزی سلام، من دِبلک لیبل هستم. اول و مهمتر از همه، مایلیم از همه طرفدارانی که همچنان عشق و حمایت خود را از هنرمندمان، رزی، نشان میدهند، صمیمانه تشکر کنیم. ما این بیانیه را در مورد انتشار اخیر اطلاعات نادرست و گمانهزنیهای تأیید نشده پیرامون شرکت رزی در دهمین سالگرد شروع به کار منتشر میکنیم. دِبلک لیبل و رزی از قبل اطمینان حاصل کردهاند که تمام تمهیدات لازم هماهنگ …
یه سوال فنی من واقعا متوجه نمیشم چرا باید رزی و لیسا سر زمان بدی افتضاح و ببخشید شخمی ع*جی تاوان پس بدن و هیت بگیرن؟ ببخشیدا وایجی داره سهامش افت میکنه اومده سریع یه چیز گفته خدایی نکرده سهامش افت نکنه! دقیقه نودی برنامه چیده بعد نتیجه چی میشه؟ نتیجه این میشه که لیسا و رزی هیت وحشتناکی بگیرن! در حدی که برای رزی بیانه منتشر کنن! دلیل این همه هیت چی بود واقعا تهش دیدیم که رزی و لیسا هم دارن برمیگردن کره خسته شین حاجی خ…
💋7
با وجود اعلامیه وایجی،انگاری قراره ot4 بگیریمو تمام اعضای بپ باشن تو فن میتینگ. جیسو و جنی در حال حاضر تو کره هستن و رزی حضور خودش رو تأیید کرده. لیسا رو تو یک پرواز به سمت کره جنوبی دیده شده .
❤🔥6💋1
اموی "Rockstar" از مرز 400 میلیون ویو عبور کرد و این سومین اموی لیسایت با این میزان ویو و اولین اموی او تحت لیبل LLOUD میباشد. #YouTube 𝗟𝗶𝘀𝗮 𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗺
❤🔥3
ترکیب ادیتهای ترند، اخبار سلبریتیها، استایلهای نود و خریدهای خاص و کیوت 🤩✨ ┌─────── ∘◦ 💫 ◦∘ ───────┐ ✧ 𝒯𝒶𝓅 𝒯ℴ 𝒜𝒹𝒹 ℰ𝓍𝓅𝓁ℴ𝓇ℯ 𝒲ℴ𝓇𝓁𝒹 ✧ └─────── ∘◦ 💫 ◦∘ ───────┘ یه بازارچه آنلاینِ همهچیزتمام دقیقاً وسط تلگرامت!🤩 😀 𝐌𝐢𝐫𝐚 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 💭
👀 وایسا... وایجی باز یه ایونت گذاشت ولی بلکپینک خبر نداشت؟ 😭 خبرها، آپدیتها، پکها و کلی محتوای بلکپینک رو از دست نده 🎀 یه سر به فولدر بزن 💘 🚀
🖤 فولدر پنجشنبه رسید! ✨ اگه عاشق BLACKPINK و محتوای خاصی، این فولدر برای توئه 🎀 📦 پک | 🤍 سلفکر | ✨ کانالهای خفن 💎 👇 یه کلیک تا دنیای جدید فاصله داری 💘 Clic Clic 🌈
File, posted without a caption
Girl, you really can't be crazy, because you look cute every single moment...
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @LalisaBloom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@bpink_crown · 23,2475 posts𖠄𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐇༆🔥꙰
@targhooh1 · 6164 posts𝘽𝘼𝙄𝙔𝙐 𝙒𝙃𝙄𝙏𝙀
@Baiyuwhite408 · 4942 posts𝐸𝓃𝑔𝓁𝒾𝓈𝒽 𝒢𝓇𝒶𝓂𝓂𝒶𝓇
@englishgrammer405 · 1692 posts𝘼𝘿𝙀𝙇𝘼 𝙃𝙊𝙐𝙎𝙀
@adelah0use · 3841 postBadBunnyIR
@BadBunnyIR · 1971 postBelfi shop
@belfi_accshop · 1291 post•●𝐁𝐋.𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊●•
@blblackGMMTV · 3781 post𝗘𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗲⁷
@ENHAs_DM · 211 post𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 𝒅𝒆𝒍 𝒓𝒆𝒚🍒
@lanadelreyirann · 2141 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗟𝗶𝘀𝗮 𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗺” (@LalisaBloom), 10 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LalisaBloom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.