Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐿𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝒲𝑒𝑒𝓀.

Channel

𝐿𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝒲𝑒𝑒𝓀.

@LastWeekLW

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

207subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001819596127
TypeChannel
Username@LastWeekLW
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/LastWeekLW

Growth

207208207.510 August 2026 — 208 subscribers11 August 2026 — 208 subscribers25 August 2026 — 207 subscribers10 August 202625 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 02:44207-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:25208no change
10 Aug 2026, 15:31208first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 56s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

394 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53751718775493924789925.1%
custom 54474276327884252429624.4%
custom 52336985968717640025814.7%
custom 53277624136284465914912.4%
custom 5434041327828363446225.58%
custom 5433723710701857449174.31%
custom 5398074129230347330164.06%
custom 5190416381773887742143.55%
custom 543390426253704564092.28%
custom 525620812103812647361.52%
custom 545635193917434763061.52%
custom 543397226475424528320.508%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 394 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LastWeekLW. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 April 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC46 views23 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Video

#collab #editsae Шикардносный коллаб с Русланом Я считаю, что мы разнесли🔥 @LastWeekLW

custom 532776241362844659116custom 53751718775493924784custom 54474276327884252423

Signed 𝒥𝒩

8 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC32 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sxzdeditsVideo

Как же я жду 2 сезон 😭 #моиэдиты

custom 53751718775493924787

Signed 𝒥𝒩

8 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC34 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @millxleqVideo

💫💫 𝐓𝐈𝐊𝐓𝐎𝐊 ✨✨ 🎥 | #mytiktok #newvideo 🤩

custom 53980741292303473305

Signed 𝒥𝒩

7 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC118 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

#РеджинаМиллс #editsae My moon 🌙 @LastWeekLW

custom 537517187754939247815custom 52336985968717640024custom 54474276327884252424custom 53277624136284465911

Signed 𝒥𝒩

20 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC203 views30 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

#outlawqueen #editsae With u and only u🥰 Нет, я не перестану делать видосы с ними из третьего сезона @LastWeekLW

custom 544742763278842524215custom 52336985968717640028custom 53980741292303473307

Signed 𝒥𝒩

15 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC113 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sxzdeditsVideo

Наш праздничный коллаб для неповторимой Ланы Паррии ❤️ Mae.aex Onxlyisaa Agmermix Katedits Ouatsl Lvsparrilla Sxzdedits Asya Careydeckerr Last Week Millxleq Wmmredits #collab #моиэдиты

custom 53751718775493924787

Signed 𝒥𝒩

15 Jul 2026, 03:23 UTC117 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

*все нарезки взяты с канала @eilerscene

custom 51904163817738877421

Signed 𝒥𝒩

15 Jul 2026, 02:52 UTC223 views22 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Video

Сегодня, пятнадцатого июля, день рождения у нашей превосходной Ланы Марии Паррии!! Никаких слов не хватит, чтобы описать мою любовь к этой даме, но в этот прекрасный день хочется выразить хотя бы благодарность🌟 Спасибо за талант, искренность, силу и вдохновение, которое ты даришь своим поклонникам уже много лет. Хочется пожелать, чтобы впереди было ещё больше ярких проектов, счастливых моментов, крепкого здоровья,

custom 544742763278842524212custom 52562081210381264736custom 53980741292303473304

Signed 𝒥𝒩

12 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC127 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

обновочка☕

custom 523369859687176400212

Signed 𝒥𝒩

5 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC340 views30 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Video

#evilqueen #editsae Души меня, Злая Королева из шестого сезона 😍 @LastWeekLW

custom 544742763278842524214custom 52336985968717640027custom 54563519391743476306custom 53751718775493924782custom 53277624136284465911

Signed 𝒥𝒩

4 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC183 views31 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

#missMadam #editsae Она превосходна💄 за нарезки спасибо @sxzdedits @LastWeekLW

custom 537517187754939247815custom 54474276327884252427custom 51904163817738877426custom 52336985968717640022custom 53277624136284465911

Signed 𝒥𝒩

26 Jun 2026, 09:42 UTC303 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

#outlawqueen #editsae Да простят меня все фанаты Свонквин на моем канале, НО Я ТАК ЛЮБЛЮ ИХ ДО ПОЯВЛЕНИЯ МЭРИАН😭 @LastWeekLW

custom 544742763278842524215custom 52336985968717640029custom 51904163817738877427custom 53277624136284465911custom 53751718775493924781

Signed 𝒥𝒩

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LastWeekLW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Apr 2026, 13:18 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Бро, такая тема, будет эдит, но по шипу, который не очень жалуют, смотрим?

  1. схаваю, смотрим83%
  2. посмотрю, поплююсь26%
  3. не смотрим0%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Хлебни ИИ
@sip_ai · 87,648
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐿𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝒲𝑒𝑒𝓀.” (@LastWeekLW), 207 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LastWeekLW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.