Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Law For Civil Services

Channel

Law For Civil Services

@Law4CivilServices

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,557subscribers

-162 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001264959374
TypeChannel
Username@Law4CivilServices
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Law4CivilServices

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Court_judge_adv/219531 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC@Law4CivilServices/7052 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@UPSC_LAW_Optionals/820831 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC@Law4CivilServices/7052 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Court_judge_adv6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Court_judge_adv (51)
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0023 minutes@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation (140)
@UPSC_LAW_Optionals6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@UPSC_LAW_Optionals (60)
@Law_For_CivilServices15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (105)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @UPSC_LAW_Optionals. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,5579,7199,6387 August 2026 — 9,719 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,718 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,703 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,687 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,666 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,650 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,627 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,615 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,605 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,600 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,583 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,565 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,557 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,533–9,743 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 16:189,557-8
11 Sept 2026, 15:559,565-18
6 Sept 2026, 18:599,583-17
1 Sept 2026, 20:589,600-5
29 Aug 2026, 14:039,605-10
26 Aug 2026, 19:349,615-12
24 Aug 2026, 02:189,627-23
20 Aug 2026, 09:159,650-16
17 Aug 2026, 10:469,666-21
14 Aug 2026, 02:159,687-16
11 Aug 2026, 05:289,703-15
8 Aug 2026, 04:259,718-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:339,719first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.445%
avg views ÷ 9,557 subscribers
Avg views / post
42.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held35 (19 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total85
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC19 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_PreparationPhoto

There’s no one way to celebrate Raksha Bandhan ♥️ Celebrate the sibling bond the way you want to. Do it. With love. With laughter. With support. With a gift that says, “I believe in you.” 🫶 This Rakhi, gift your sibling more than just a thread 🎁 Gift them the Edzorb Law PREMIUM+ Course because sometimes the best way to support someone’s dream is to help them prepare for it. ⚖️ Rakhi isn’t just about protection.

25 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC66 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_PreparationPhoto

Rajasthan APO

21 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC112 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @edzorblaw

Bhumika Trust v. Union of India & Connected Cases W.P.(C) No. 001110/2025 & Connected Cases 3-year practice rule upheld: Supreme Court refused to reconsider the fundamental requirement of prior legal experience before entering judicial service. Transition period: Candidates applying under notifications issued from May 25, 2025 to March 31, 2027 can apply without prior practice. Deemed 1-year practice: Such candid

19 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC95 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation

Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 ✔️ Presidential assent:– 7th April, 2026; Amendments made in 79 Central Acts of 23 Ministries. ✔️Total 784 provisions amended:- For minor procedural lapses, criminal penalties replaced with civil/administrative penalties. ✔️Key Objectives:- Ease of Living, simplifying compliance and reducing unnecessary criminal prosecution for minor offences. ✔️Provision:– Warning for

19 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC87 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_PreparationPhoto

🆘🔥 LIVE NOW Free RJS APO Prelims Simulator Mock @EdzorbLaw App. 🏄 REGISTER, Attempt NOW, HURRY NOW: https://app.edzorb.in/products/free-rjs-apo-prelims-simulator-mock/ ⚠️ The window is open for 24 hours only. With ♥️ Team Edzorb

17 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC89 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_PreparationVideo

🇮🇳 LAST DAY to SAVE Rs 4000 on the Premium+ course. ☎️ For Coupon Codes, WhatsApp us 🤙 at +919889883719 || +919685513769 ✉️ Join 🔜 @Edzorblaw ✅ With ♥️ Team Edzorb

15 Aug 2026, 02:29 UTC100 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation

🇮🇳🇮🇳 80वें स्वतंत्रता दिवस की हार्दिक शुभकामनायें 🇮🇳🇮🇳 🇮🇳🇮🇳Heartfelt wishes on the 80th Independence Day 🇮🇳🇮🇳

11 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC94 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation

🌐Law Notes https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9FXaFLtOj4W4BrLs3h 🌐Constitution https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaBQVoRF1YlLNQdj502C 🌐Law Students https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5qvAuBadmb3FTIll1e 🌐UP Judiciary https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4Jow7BKfhtL08i1R0r 🌐Recent Case Law https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbB6CXh8fewqGQwajr2J 🌐Law For Civil Services https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VasTfge1Xquf4u0M7f

11 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC65 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation

34. *Principle of Collective Responsibility* – All members of the government are unanimous in support of its policies and actions. *(Article 75)* 35. *Principle of Individual Responsibility* – Each minister is responsible to the legislature for every action taken or omitted in his ministry. *(Article 75)* 36. *Sine Die* – Means without any future date being designated. *(Article 85)* 37. *Ad Hoc* – Means for the s

11 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC95 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation

_*Limitation Periods*_ 1. The time for filing First Appeal in civil cases is 30 days. 2. The time for filing Second Appeal in civil cases is 60 days. 3. The time for filing civil revision is 90 days. 4. The limitation period for appeal in Capital Punishment is 7 days. 5. The limitation period of appeal from Magistrate to Sessions Court is 30 days. 6. The limitation period of appeal from Sessions Court to High C

11 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC55 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation

📘 *LIST OF DOCTRINES - THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA* 1. *Ejusdem Generis* – Means of the same kind. *(Article 12)* 2. *Ab Initio* – Means for the very beginning. *(Article 13)* 3. *Doctrine of Judicial Review* – A law is declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court or High Court if it contravenes any of the Fundamental Rights. *(Articles 13, 32, 226)* 4. *Doctrine of Eclipse* – The law which contravenes Fundamenta

10 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC59 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation

🌐Judicial Services https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4Kw1972WTv8QxTPr0M 🌐Indian Judiciary https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va98EuXB4hdTXjjCWK2n 🌐Indian Law https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb61Cng7oQhhYZCrLQ2Y 🌐Indian Judicial Services https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5ZK8o8aKvIg9SynB1U 🌐Judiciary Interview https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6HWg0Lo4hWfPbVk21d 🌐Judiciary https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb69u

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Law4CivilServices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Daily HINDI Motivational Thoughts™ VICHAR
@HINDI_MOTIVATIONAL_QUOTES_VICHAR · 145,236
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
UPPCS UPPSC UP PSC PCS 2024 UPPSC 2025 UP RO UP ARO PCS Judiciary
@uppcsexamnotes · 57,784
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
Legal Materials Hub
@LawCollegeNotes_Stufffs · 40,380
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
Law Exam CLAT Legal LSAT PDF
@law_exam_clat_legal_lsat_pdf · 58,910
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
SSC RAILWAY GK GS Tricks
@SSC_GD_BSSC_GK_GS_Tricks_HINDI · 198,161
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
CA Guru Ji
@cagurujii · 29,329
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Engineering Jobs - Civil | Mechanical | Electrical | IT
@Engineering_Govt_Private_Jobs · 28,623
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Law For Civil Services” (@Law4CivilServices), 9,557 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Law4CivilServices.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.