Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Learn with Ala

Channel

Learn with Ala

@Learnwithala

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

614subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001997311192
TypeChannel
Username@Learnwithala
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Learnwithala

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

614617615.57 August 2026 — 616 subscribers7 August 2026 — 616 subscribers15 August 2026 — 615 subscribers22 August 2026 — 617 subscribers6 September 2026 — 615 subscribers14 September 2026 — 614 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 614–617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 13:40614-1
6 Sept 2026, 07:55615-2
22 Aug 2026, 03:53617+2
15 Aug 2026, 00:12615-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:28616no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:45616first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6162.9%
😍77.22%
🍓66.19%
👍66.19%
🎉44.12%
🏆44.12%
👏44.12%
🙏33.09%
✍22.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC100 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🎶 Hate that I made you love me 🆔 @learnwithala

❤5🙏1

1 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC100 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

آلبوم جدید #آریانا_گرانده ✨ 🆔@learnwithala

🍓6😍3

22 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTCviews —

Learn with Ala pinned «💼 حتما توی مصاحبه‌های کاری یا گفتگو با دوستتون این سوال رو شنیدین. 💭پنج‌سال دیگه خودت رو کجا می‌بینی؟ ➡️Where do you see yourself in five years? شما کدوم رو انتخاب می‌کنین؟ 🆔 @learnwithala»

22 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC270 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

وقتی می‌خوای درباره هدفت صحبت کنی، از این ساختار استفاده کن. 💬 یعنی: «هدفم اینه که…» بعد از My goal is to همیشه فعل ساده (Base Verb) میاد. ✅ 📌 فرمول: My goal is to + Verb ✅ My goal is to become a project manager. 👩‍💼 هدفم اینه که مدیر پروژه بشم. ✅ My goal is to build my own company. 🏢 هدفم اینه که شرکت خودم رو راه‌اندازی کنم. ✅ My goal is to improve my English. 📚 هدفم اینه که انگلیسیم رو بهتر کنم. 🆔 @learnwith

❤10🏆3✍2

22 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC226 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💭اگه خیلی مطمئن نیستی، با این عبارت‌ها جوابت رو شروع کن. 🌱 Hopefully… امیدوارم که… مثال: ✅ Hopefully, I’ll be working as a teacher. 👩‍🏫 امیدوارم اون موقع معلم باشم. 🌟 Ideally… اگه همه‌چی ایده‌آل پیش بره… یا در بهترین حالت… مثال: ✅ Ideally, I’ll have my own business. 💼 در بهترین حالت، کسب‌وکار خودم رو داشته باشم. 🍀 If everything goes well… اگه همه‌چی خوب پیش بره… مثال: ✅ If everything goes well, I’ll be living…

❤9👏2😍2

22 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC156 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💭✨ I see myself + V-ing وقتی می‌خوای از تصویری که از آینده‌ی خودت توی ذهنت داری حرف بزنی، از این ساختار استفاده کن. 🌱🔮 💡 یعنی: 👤 «خودمو در حالِ… تصور می‌کنم.» یا 🌟 «فکر می‌کنم چند سال دیگه… باشم.» 📌 بعد از I see myself معمولاً فعل + ing میاد. ✅ 💼 I see myself working in marketing. ➡️ خودمو در حال کار کردن توی مارکتینگ تصور می‌کنم. 🌍 I see myself living abroad. ➡️ خودمو در حال زندگی کردن خارج از کشور تصور می‌کنم…

❤10👏2😍2

22 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC151 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Where do you see yourself in 5 years?

  1. 📚 Studying at university24%
  2. 💼 Working my dream job28%
  3. ✈️ Living in another country48%
  4. 🏡 Having my own home24%
  5. 🤔 Still figuring things out10%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Learnwithala. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Where do you see yourself in 5 years?

  1. 📚 Studying at university24%
  2. 💼 Working my dream job28%
  3. ✈️ Living in another country48%
  4. 🏡 Having my own home24%
  5. 🤔 Still figuring things out10%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پروژه تاریخ شفاهی ایران در دانشگاه هاروارد
@tarikh_shafahi_iran_project · 57,441
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Learn with Ala” (@Learnwithala), 614 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Learnwithala.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.