Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📍«ЖКХ. Мечты сбываются» с Еленой Молчановой (ex- Шерешовец)

Channel

📍«ЖКХ. Мечты сбываются» с Еленой Молчановой (ex- Шерешовец)

@Lena_Shereshovec

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,126subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001340267435
TypeChannel
Username@Lena_Shereshovec
DescriptionДруг УО и РСО. Глава Экспертного совета Ассоциации "Р1". Автор, спикер. Член Комитета ЖКХ ТПП РФ. Практикующий юрист с 2001 года.
Created25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lena_Shereshovec

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,1227,1737,147.56 August 2026 — 7,173 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,169 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,161 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,143 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,138 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,136 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,135 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,136 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,142 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,134 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,135 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,139 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,138 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,122 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,129 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,124 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,125 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,126 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,130 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,132 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,126 subscribers7,1266 August 20264 November 2026
21 measurements spanning 90 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,114–7,181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 06:447,126-6
31 Oct 2026, 20:077,132+2
28 Oct 2026, 19:117,130+4
25 Oct 2026, 09:067,126+1
22 Oct 2026, 00:507,125+1
18 Oct 2026, 21:287,124-5
12 Oct 2026, 15:487,129+7
6 Oct 2026, 03:577,122-16
28 Sept 2026, 22:567,138-1
18 Sept 2026, 16:197,139+4
14 Sept 2026, 04:587,135+1
10 Sept 2026, 20:217,134-8
5 Sept 2026, 15:567,142+6
29 Aug 2026, 15:267,136+1
26 Aug 2026, 09:187,135-1
23 Aug 2026, 00:287,136-2
20 Aug 2026, 00:257,138-5
13 Aug 2026, 07:157,143-18
10 Aug 2026, 01:117,161-8
7 Aug 2026, 02:217,169first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 7,126 subscribers
Avg views / post
863
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held82 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total21,567
Reactions total173
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,530
Videos
≈339
Links
≈1,690

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

579 reactions across 62 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12421.4%
❤11419.7%
😁9816.9%
🔥6511.2%
✍345.87%
💯325.53%
❤‍🔥274.66%
🤣264.49%
🆒223.80%
👏71.21%
⚡50.864%
🏆30.518%
🐳30.518%
😱30.518%
🙈30.518%
👀20.345%
🙏20.345%
🤡20.345%
🤩20.345%
🍾10.173%
4 further kinds40.691%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 644 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (4.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC277 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Пора рассказать, что в ноябре у меня пройдёт офигенный вебинар с кучей лайфхаков. Подробности здесь.

🔥6❤‍🔥1🆒1

5 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC506 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#ИнтереснаяСудебнаяПрактика Ещё одна неприятная история из серии "мы всё правильно посчитали, но"… Суть: УК рассчитывает пени строго по ч. 14 ст. 155 ЖК РФ, идёт взыскивать долг в суд, а там должник говорит: "Что-то очень много получилось. Прошу применить статью 333 ГК РФ". И да. Суд действительно может взять и уменьшить наши совершенно правильно рассчитанные пени, если посчитает их явно несоразмерными последствия…

❤8✍2⚡1🆒1

5 Nov 2026, 05:21 UTC479 viewsread 6 November 2026

Итак, сегодня четверг (кстати, как отдохнули вчера?)) и #РыбныйДеньЖКХ 1️⃣ Светлана Крюкова: Добрый вечер, подскажите пожалуйста. Что делать управляющей компании если собственник купил квартиру открыл ИП и стал осуществлять услуги по банкротству.отдельный выход не сделал, жилое помещение в нежилое не перевёл. УК не пускает для проведения акта осмотра, ссылаясь на занятость. Соседи хотят чтобы УК приняла меры. 2️⃣ М…

5 Nov 2026, 03:06 UTC536 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Начнем разминку #РыбныйДеньЖКХ Вопрос от Галины: Собственник жилого помещения умер. Наследник вступил в наследство. Но лицевой счет в РКЦ переоформлять не торопится (даже можно сказать: не хочет). Неофициально знаем, кто именно – этот новый собственник. Добрые беседы, убеждения – не действуют. УО не может обновить реестр собственников (хотя бы для того же ОСС). Взыскание долга для УО и РСО – тоже проблема (просужив…

❤4👍3

4 Nov 2026, 04:24 UTC499 views30 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ukzeleniybulvar

😂 Ничто так не объединяет соседей в домовом чате, как пакет с мусором, оставленный кем-то в подъезде. 🇷🇺 С Днём народного единства.

😁24🔥4❤2

3 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC635 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Тянется дольше обычного 😵‍💫😅

💯6😁5🤣3🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 04:57 UTC684 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#ИнтереснаяСудебнаяПрактика Как взыскать долг за ЖКУ, если у УК нет идентификаторов должника, а суд не очень хочет их искать? Давайте разберём ещё одну очень жизненную ситуацию. УК обращается за судебным приказом, но не знает дату и место рождения должника, СНИЛС, ИНН или паспортные данные. Пишем в заявлении, что сведения взыскателю неизвестны, и просим суд их запросить. Казалось бы, всё просто. Но на практике нач…

✍4❤2

30 Oct 2026, 06:01 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣4👍2

30 Oct 2026, 06:01 UTC≈1,050 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Опять про списки должников. Что ни говори, а этот метод работает. У нас в менталитете записана важность того «что скажут люди»))) По общему правилу, размещение списка должников с указанием квартиры и размера задолженности, без привязки к персональным данным не является нарушением. ✅Чаще всего судебная практика следует именно этой логике, вот примеры: Первый кассационный суд общей юрисдикции в определении от 18.11…

⚡3🔥2👍1

29 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC935 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вот мы заключили с должником СОГЛАШЕНИЕ О РАССРОЧКЕ. Должны ли мы брать проценты за рассрочку? Если да, как указывать в квитанции и как оформлять? Согласно п. 75 ПП 354 порядок и условия предоставления рассрочки оплаты ЖКУ (кроме случая, указанного в пункте 72 ПП 354), согласовываются потребителем и исполнителем. Получается, чтобы такие проценты брать – их сначала нужно согласовать с потребителем. Заключаем соглаш…

🙏1

29 Oct 2026, 07:46 UTC915 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Рубрика #ДелимсяОпытом Спасибо большое Наталье Лимоновой ♥️ Она прислала для всех свежая судебная практика по вывескам . И попросила пользоваться на здоровье 😊 Апелляцию тоже пройдена. Решение выкладываю ниже.

👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @Lena_Shereshovec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Управдом | ЖКХ
@upravdom_channel · 31,853
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
ЖКХ
@gkhvsem · 40,294
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
ГОРОДСКОЕ ПРАВО
@legalurbanology · 23,392
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 October 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📍«ЖКХ. Мечты сбываются» с Еленой Молчановой (ex- Шерешовец)” (@Lena_Shereshovec), 7,126 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lena_Shereshovec.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.